Reasons for Undesirable Pregnancy Outcomes among Women with Appendicitis: The Experience of a Tertiary Center.


Journal

Emergency medicine international
ISSN: 2090-2840
Titre abrégé: Emerg Med Int
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101567070

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 17 04 2020
revised: 18 07 2020
accepted: 05 09 2020
entrez: 5 10 2020
pubmed: 6 10 2020
medline: 6 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although laparoscopic appendectomy increases its popularity today, the answer to the question of whether to perform open or laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy is appropriate in many studies, and the choice of surgery depends on the surgeon. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the variables that affect undesirable pregnancy outcomes that occur as a result of appendicitis during pregnancy. Seventy-eight pregnant patients with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic or open technique intervention enrolled in this retrospective study. In addition to the demographic structure of the patients, surgical technique, the number of pregnancies, multiple pregnancy status, surgical pathologies, laboratory values, radiological imaging methods, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. The severity of appendicitis was classified according to the pathology results. The patients were divided into two groups according to the outcomes of their pregnancy. Preterm delivery and abortion involved in the study as a single complication section. The mean age of the pregnant patients was 28.6 ± 5. Of the 78 pregnant women with appendicitis, 47.4% had their first pregnancy, 37.2% had their second pregnancy, and 15.4% had 3 or more pregnancies. The preterm delivery and abortus were 19.5% in the open appendectomy (OA) group and 16.2% in the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group. No statistically significant difference was detected in this group in terms of appendicitis pathology triggering preterm delivery or abortion ( Consequently, acute appendicitis may cause serious intra-abdominal infection and inflammation in addition to the complexity of the diagnosis due to the nature of pregnancy, as well as undesired pregnancy outcomes with the surgical technique, or independently with other variables.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although laparoscopic appendectomy increases its popularity today, the answer to the question of whether to perform open or laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy is appropriate in many studies, and the choice of surgery depends on the surgeon. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the variables that affect undesirable pregnancy outcomes that occur as a result of appendicitis during pregnancy.
METHODS METHODS
Seventy-eight pregnant patients with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic or open technique intervention enrolled in this retrospective study. In addition to the demographic structure of the patients, surgical technique, the number of pregnancies, multiple pregnancy status, surgical pathologies, laboratory values, radiological imaging methods, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. The severity of appendicitis was classified according to the pathology results. The patients were divided into two groups according to the outcomes of their pregnancy. Preterm delivery and abortion involved in the study as a single complication section.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean age of the pregnant patients was 28.6 ± 5. Of the 78 pregnant women with appendicitis, 47.4% had their first pregnancy, 37.2% had their second pregnancy, and 15.4% had 3 or more pregnancies. The preterm delivery and abortus were 19.5% in the open appendectomy (OA) group and 16.2% in the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group. No statistically significant difference was detected in this group in terms of appendicitis pathology triggering preterm delivery or abortion (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Consequently, acute appendicitis may cause serious intra-abdominal infection and inflammation in addition to the complexity of the diagnosis due to the nature of pregnancy, as well as undesired pregnancy outcomes with the surgical technique, or independently with other variables.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33014470
doi: 10.1155/2020/6039862
pmc: PMC7512082
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

6039862

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Baris Mantoglu et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Références

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):4-12
pubmed: 21178041
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jan;136(1):16-9
pubmed: 17275981
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;52(4):586-96
pubmed: 20393411
Int J Womens Health. 2019 Feb 08;11:119-134
pubmed: 30804686
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jul;19(4):362-4
pubmed: 15512331
Int J Surg. 2014 Nov;12(11):1235-41
pubmed: 25219891
World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):86-92
pubmed: 17180556
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):332-7
pubmed: 24950289
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3767-3782
pubmed: 28643072
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Jun 24;31(4):224-8
pubmed: 26668531
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 26;11:281-287
pubmed: 30100748
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Aug;20(4):515-523
pubmed: 28553692
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44
pubmed: 27582784
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr 16;13:19
pubmed: 29686725
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Jun;81(3):245-7
pubmed: 12767564
Ann Ital Chir. 2015 Mar-Apr;86(2):137-42
pubmed: 25952362
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Apr;17(2):186-90
pubmed: 17484645
Surg Endosc. 1998 Feb;12(2):189-90
pubmed: 9479743
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Sep 23;12(1):619
pubmed: 31547839
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Dec;26(4):801-9
pubmed: 6661836
BMC Surg. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):41
pubmed: 31023289
Med Clin North Am. 1987 May;71(3):551-60
pubmed: 3553778
Am J Surg. 2010 Sep;200(3):363-7
pubmed: 20800715
Int Sch Res Notices. 2017 Jul 20;2017:2636759
pubmed: 28808675
Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):237-41
pubmed: 14691706
Surg Clin North Am. 1995 Feb;75(1):15-31
pubmed: 7855715
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1475-81
pubmed: 27072934
Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1470-8
pubmed: 23001791
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2015 Mar-Apr;61(2):170-7
pubmed: 26107368
JAAPA. 2007 Dec;20(12):36-8, 41
pubmed: 18181368
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1574-8
pubmed: 21052721

Auteurs

Baris Mantoglu (B)

Sakarya University Educating and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Fatih Altintoprak (F)

Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Necattin Firat (N)

Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Emre Gonullu (E)

Sakarya University Educating and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Enis Dikicier (E)

Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Yesim Akdeniz (Y)

Sakarya University Educating and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Mehmet Aziret (M)

Sakarya University Educating and Research Hospital, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Unal Erkorkmaz (U)

Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH