A fully automated left atrium segmentation approach from late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging based on a convolutional neural network.

Convolutional neural networks (CNN) late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE MRI) left atrium

Journal

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
entrez: 5 10 2020
pubmed: 6 10 2020
medline: 6 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Several studies suggest that the evaluation of left atrial (LA) fibrosis is a relevant information for the assessment of the appropriate strategy in catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF). Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive technique, which might be employed for the non-invasive quantification of LA myocardial fibrotic tissue in patients with AF. Nowadays, the analysis of LGE MRI relies on manual tracing of LA boundaries and this procedure is time-consuming and prone to high inter-observer variability given the different degrees of observers' experience, LA wall thickness and data resolution. Therefore, an automated segmentation approach of the atrial cavity for the quantification of scar tissue would be highly desirable. This study focuses on the design of a fully automated LGE MRI segmentation pipeline which includes a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on the successful architecture U-Net. The CNN was trained, validated and tested end-to-end with the data available from the Statistical Atlases and Computational Modelling of the Heart 2018 Atrial Segmentation Challenge (100 cardiac data). Two different approaches were tested: using both stacks of 2-D axial slices and using 3-D data (with the appropriate changes in the baseline architecture). In the latter approach, thanks to the 3-D convolution operator, all the information underlying 3-D data can be exploited. Once the training was completed using 80 cardiac data, a post-processing step was applied on 20 predicted segmentations belonging to the test set. By applying the 2-D and 3-D approaches, average Dice coefficient and mean Hausdorff distances were 0.896, 0.914, and 8.98 mm, 8.34 mm, respectively. Volumes of the anatomical LA meshes from the automated analysis were highly correlated with the volumes from ground truth [2-D: r=0.978, y=0.94x+0.07, bias=3.5 ml (5.6%), SD=5.3 mL (8.5%); 3-D: r=0.982, y=0.92x+2.9, bias=2.1 mL (3.5%), SD=5.2 mL (8.4%)]. These results suggest the proposed approach is feasible and provides accurate results. Despite the increase of the number of trainable parameters, the proposed 3-D CNN learns better features leading to higher performance, feasible for a real clinical application.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Several studies suggest that the evaluation of left atrial (LA) fibrosis is a relevant information for the assessment of the appropriate strategy in catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF). Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive technique, which might be employed for the non-invasive quantification of LA myocardial fibrotic tissue in patients with AF. Nowadays, the analysis of LGE MRI relies on manual tracing of LA boundaries and this procedure is time-consuming and prone to high inter-observer variability given the different degrees of observers' experience, LA wall thickness and data resolution. Therefore, an automated segmentation approach of the atrial cavity for the quantification of scar tissue would be highly desirable.
METHODS METHODS
This study focuses on the design of a fully automated LGE MRI segmentation pipeline which includes a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on the successful architecture U-Net. The CNN was trained, validated and tested end-to-end with the data available from the Statistical Atlases and Computational Modelling of the Heart 2018 Atrial Segmentation Challenge (100 cardiac data). Two different approaches were tested: using both stacks of 2-D axial slices and using 3-D data (with the appropriate changes in the baseline architecture). In the latter approach, thanks to the 3-D convolution operator, all the information underlying 3-D data can be exploited. Once the training was completed using 80 cardiac data, a post-processing step was applied on 20 predicted segmentations belonging to the test set.
RESULTS RESULTS
By applying the 2-D and 3-D approaches, average Dice coefficient and mean Hausdorff distances were 0.896, 0.914, and 8.98 mm, 8.34 mm, respectively. Volumes of the anatomical LA meshes from the automated analysis were highly correlated with the volumes from ground truth [2-D: r=0.978, y=0.94x+0.07, bias=3.5 ml (5.6%), SD=5.3 mL (8.5%); 3-D: r=0.982, y=0.92x+2.9, bias=2.1 mL (3.5%), SD=5.2 mL (8.4%)].
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest the proposed approach is feasible and provides accurate results. Despite the increase of the number of trainable parameters, the proposed 3-D CNN learns better features leading to higher performance, feasible for a real clinical application.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33014723
doi: 10.21037/qims-20-168
pii: qims-10-10-1894
pmc: PMC7495320
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1894-1907

Informations de copyright

2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-168). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Oct 07;14:88
pubmed: 26445883
Europace. 2009 Oct;11(10):1289-94
pubmed: 19632980
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jan;45:51-57
pubmed: 28958877
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Apr;49(4):939-954
pubmed: 30575178
Circulation. 2010 Dec 7;122(23):2368-77
pubmed: 21098450
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):1562-1576
pubmed: 29480931
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Feb;38(2):515-524
pubmed: 30716023
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Feb;37(2):371-8
pubmed: 11216949
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Aug;10(8):1184-91
pubmed: 23685170
Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 6;9(1):5217
pubmed: 30523263
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Sep;9(9):1516-1527
pubmed: 31667138
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1461-1470
pubmed: 30297256
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 25;66(8):943-59
pubmed: 26293766
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 11;57(2):160-6
pubmed: 21211687
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Aug;44(2):346-54
pubmed: 26752729
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Dec 20;15:105
pubmed: 24359544
Stroke. 1991 Aug;22(8):983-8
pubmed: 1866765
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):498-506
pubmed: 24496537
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):138-45
pubmed: 24118197
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Dec;9(12):2003-9
pubmed: 23000671
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66
pubmed: 9725923

Auteurs

Davide Borra (D)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Alice Andalò (A)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Michelangelo Paci (M)

BioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33520 Tampere, Finland.

Claudio Fabbri (C)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Cristiana Corsi (C)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH