Remdesivir for Adults With COVID-19 : A Living Systematic Review for American College of Physicians Practice Points.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 6 10 2020
medline: 25 2 2021
entrez: 5 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Few treatments exist for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To evaluate the effectiveness and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19. Several databases, tables of contents of journals, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration and company websites were searched from 1 January through 31 August 2020. English-language, randomized trials of remdesivir treatments for adults with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. New evidence will be incorporated using living review methods. Single-reviewer abstraction and risk-of-bias assessment verified by a second reviewer; GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods used for certainty-of-evidence assessments. Four randomized trials were included. In adults with severe COVID-19, remdesivir compared with placebo probably improves recovery by a large amount (absolute risk difference [ARD] range, 7% to 10%) and may result in a small reduction in mortality (ARD range, -4% to 1%) and a shorter time to recovery or clinical improvement. Remdesivir may have little to no effect on hospital length of stay. Remdesivir probably reduces serious adverse events by a moderate amount (ARD range, -6% to -8%). Compared with a 10-day remdesivir course, a 5-day course may reduce mortality, increase recovery or clinical improvement by small to moderate amounts, reduce time to recovery, and reduce serious adverse events among hospitalized patients not requiring mechanical ventilation. Recovery due to remdesivir may not vary by age, sex, symptom duration, or disease severity. Low-certainty evidence with few published trials, including 1 preliminary report and 2 open-label trials. Trials excluded pregnant women and adults with severe kidney or liver disease. In hospitalized adults with COVID-19, remdesivir probably improves recovery and reduces serious adverse events and may reduce mortality and time to clinical improvement. For adults not receiving mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a 5-day course of remdesivir may provide similar benefits to and fewer harms than a 10-day course. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development Service, and Evidence Synthesis Program.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Few treatments exist for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
PURPOSE
To evaluate the effectiveness and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19.
DATA SOURCES
Several databases, tables of contents of journals, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration and company websites were searched from 1 January through 31 August 2020.
STUDY SELECTION
English-language, randomized trials of remdesivir treatments for adults with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. New evidence will be incorporated using living review methods.
DATA EXTRACTION
Single-reviewer abstraction and risk-of-bias assessment verified by a second reviewer; GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods used for certainty-of-evidence assessments.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Four randomized trials were included. In adults with severe COVID-19, remdesivir compared with placebo probably improves recovery by a large amount (absolute risk difference [ARD] range, 7% to 10%) and may result in a small reduction in mortality (ARD range, -4% to 1%) and a shorter time to recovery or clinical improvement. Remdesivir may have little to no effect on hospital length of stay. Remdesivir probably reduces serious adverse events by a moderate amount (ARD range, -6% to -8%). Compared with a 10-day remdesivir course, a 5-day course may reduce mortality, increase recovery or clinical improvement by small to moderate amounts, reduce time to recovery, and reduce serious adverse events among hospitalized patients not requiring mechanical ventilation. Recovery due to remdesivir may not vary by age, sex, symptom duration, or disease severity.
LIMITATIONS
Low-certainty evidence with few published trials, including 1 preliminary report and 2 open-label trials. Trials excluded pregnant women and adults with severe kidney or liver disease.
CONCLUSION
In hospitalized adults with COVID-19, remdesivir probably improves recovery and reduces serious adverse events and may reduce mortality and time to clinical improvement. For adults not receiving mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a 5-day course of remdesivir may provide similar benefits to and fewer harms than a 10-day course.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development Service, and Evidence Synthesis Program.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33017170
doi: 10.7326/M20-5752
pmc: PMC7564604
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antiviral Agents 0
remdesivir 3QKI37EEHE
Adenosine Monophosphate 415SHH325A
Alanine OF5P57N2ZX

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

209-220

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateIn

Auteurs

Timothy J Wilt (TJ)

Minneapolis VA Evidence Synthesis Program, Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota (T.J.W.).

Anjum S Kaka (AS)

Minneapolis VA Section of Infectious Diseases and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota (A.S.K.).

Roderick MacDonald (R)

Minneapolis VA Evidence Synthesis Program, Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.M., N.G.).

Nancy Greer (N)

Minneapolis VA Evidence Synthesis Program, Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.M., N.G.).

Adam Obley (A)

VA Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon (A.O.).

Wei Duan-Porter (W)

Minneapolis VA Evidence Synthesis Program, Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.D.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH