Validation of the Italian Version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and Factors Associated with Educational Needs.
educational needs assessment tool
rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2020
01 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
30
08
2020
revised:
16
09
2020
accepted:
23
09
2020
entrez:
6
10
2020
pubmed:
7
10
2020
medline:
7
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The educational needs assessment tool (ENAT) is a seven-domain questionnaire assessing the educational needs (EN) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the ENAT and to identify factors associated with EN in people with RA. The original English ENAT version was translated into Italian according to Beaton's method and subjected to Rasch analysis for validity testing. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were tested for associations with the ENAT domain scores using a multivariable linear regression model. The ENAT translated well into Italian and retained its construct validity. Some adjustments were needed when pooling the Italian and English datasets. The overall score of the ENAT had a high median: 82.8 (interquartile range (IQR): 57.5 to 100) i.e., 72.4% of the maximum score. The highest score was observed in the domain "Arthritis process" and the lowest was in "Support systems". Only gender was independently associated with EN (females having higher EN than males). The Italian ENAT is feasible for the use in the clinical setting and may help the health care practitioners to tailor educational interventions for RA patients. The characteristics of the patients, particularly female gender, may be associated with higher EN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33019610
pii: jpm10040150
doi: 10.3390/jpm10040150
pmc: PMC7712017
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
BMJ. 1995 Jan 21;310(6973):170
pubmed: 7833759
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1358-62
pubmed: 18050173
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):948-959
pubmed: 27979873
Br J Clin Psychol. 2007 Mar;46(Pt 1):1-18
pubmed: 17472198
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 2;18(1):335
pubmed: 28768510
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6):1126-32
pubmed: 26162769
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Jun;22(3):395-405
pubmed: 18519095
Musculoskeletal Care. 2018 Jun;16(2):313-317
pubmed: 29417718
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 Mar-Apr;38(2):282-288
pubmed: 31365330
Lupus. 2014 Nov;23(13):1370-6
pubmed: 25059487
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Feb;36(2):289-94
pubmed: 26321625
Acta Reumatol Port. 2015 Jul-Sep;40(3):242-53
pubmed: 24879909
Arthritis Res Ther. 2013 Oct 20;15(5):R156
pubmed: 24286444
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jan;66(1):34-45
pubmed: 16396980
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 03;12:695-705
pubmed: 29765206
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
J Rheumatol. 1997 Jul;24(7):1378-83
pubmed: 9228140
Health Educ Res. 2000 Dec;15(6):665-80
pubmed: 11142075
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 May 24;12:110
pubmed: 21609481
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Aug;38(8):1471-1478
pubmed: 29497844
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Nov;70(12):857-60
pubmed: 2818162
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(1):R7
pubmed: 19144159
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jun 15;51(3):388-98
pubmed: 15188324
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):685-699
pubmed: 31969328
Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):721-33
pubmed: 25231203
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Sep;69(9):1580-8
pubmed: 20699241
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Dec;73(12):2122-9
pubmed: 23921996
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):954-62
pubmed: 25735643
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Aug 19;16:194
pubmed: 26285693
Patient Educ Couns. 1993 May;20(2-3):177-87
pubmed: 8337194