Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement.


Journal

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology
ISSN: 2059-7983
Titre abrégé: Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676043

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 17 06 2020
accepted: 18 08 2020
entrez: 6 10 2020
pubmed: 7 10 2020
medline: 10 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The conventional approach in molecular replacement is the use of a related structure as a search model. However, this is not always possible as the availability of such structures can be scarce for poorly characterized families of proteins. In these cases, alternative approaches can be explored, such as the use of small ideal fragments that share high, albeit local, structural similarity with the unknown protein. Earlier versions of AMPLE enabled the trialling of a library of ideal helices, which worked well for largely helical proteins at suitable resolutions. Here, the performance of libraries of helical ensembles created by clustering helical segments is explored. The impacts of different B-factor treatments and different degrees of structural heterogeneity are explored. A 30% increase in the number of solutions obtained by AMPLE was observed when using this new set of ensembles compared with the performance with ideal helices. The boost in performance was notable across three different fold classes: transmembrane, globular and coiled-coil structures. Furthermore, the increased effectiveness of these ensembles was coupled to a reduction in the time required by AMPLE to reach a solution. AMPLE users can now take full advantage of this new library of search models by activating the `helical ensembles' mode.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33021498
pii: S205979832001133X
doi: 10.1107/S205979832001133X
pmc: PMC7543657
doi:

Substances chimiques

Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

962-970

Informations de copyright

open access.

Références

Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 1;28(23):3150-2
pubmed: 23060610
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011 Apr;67(Pt 4):235-42
pubmed: 21460441
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2017 Dec 1;73(Pt 12):985-996
pubmed: 29199978
FEBS Lett. 2004 Feb 13;559(1-3):145-51
pubmed: 14960323
Cell. 1992 Mar 20;68(6):1145-62
pubmed: 1547508
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2020 Mar 1;76(Pt 3):209-220
pubmed: 32133986
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002 Jun;58(Pt 6 No 1):899-907
pubmed: 12037327
J Mol Biochem. 2012;1(2):76-85
pubmed: 27882309
Structure. 1998 Jan 15;6(1):75-88
pubmed: 9493269
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D376-D382
pubmed: 31724711
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2020 Mar 1;76(Pt 3):193-208
pubmed: 32133985
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Mar 1;74(Pt 3):194-204
pubmed: 29533227
J Appl Crystallogr. 2007 Aug 1;40(Pt 4):658-674
pubmed: 19461840
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2020 Mar 1;76(Pt 3):272-284
pubmed: 32133991
Acta Crystallogr A. 1990 Feb 1;46 ( Pt 2):73-82
pubmed: 2180438
Nat Methods. 2009 Sep;6(9):651-3
pubmed: 19684596
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2020 Jan 1;76(Pt 1):1-8
pubmed: 31909738
Nat Methods. 2013 Nov;10(11):1099-101
pubmed: 24037245
Proteins. 2000 Aug 15;40(3):502-11
pubmed: 10861942
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004 Dec;60(Pt 12 Pt 1):2184-95
pubmed: 15572771
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2008 Jan;64(Pt 1):61-9
pubmed: 18094468
IUCrJ. 2016 Jun 15;3(Pt 4):259-70
pubmed: 27437113
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Mar 1;74(Pt 3):205-214
pubmed: 29533228
Structure. 2000 Nov 15;8(11):R213-20
pubmed: 11080645
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2013 Nov;69(Pt 11):2251-6
pubmed: 24189237
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2008 Jan;64(Pt 1):1-10
pubmed: 18094461
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Mar 1;74(Pt 3):183-193
pubmed: 29533226
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2015 Feb;71(Pt 2):338-43
pubmed: 25664744
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002 Nov;58(Pt 11):1941-7
pubmed: 12393926
IUCrJ. 2015 Feb 26;2(Pt 2):198-206
pubmed: 25866657
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2001 Oct;57(Pt 10):1373-82
pubmed: 11567148
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D524-9
pubmed: 23203988
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Apr 1;74(Pt 4):245-255
pubmed: 29652252
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Mar 1;74(Pt 3):167-182
pubmed: 29533225
Nature. 2012 Nov 8;491(7423):222-7
pubmed: 23135467
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Feb 1;74(Pt 2):106-116
pubmed: 29533236
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006 Aug;62(Pt 8):901-8
pubmed: 16855307
J Mol Biol. 2002 Feb 1;315(5):1129-43
pubmed: 11827481
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2012 Dec;68(Pt 12):1622-31
pubmed: 23151627

Auteurs

Filomeno Sánchez Rodríguez (F)

Institute of Structural, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom.

Adam J Simpkin (AJ)

Institute of Structural, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom.

Owen R Davies (OR)

Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.

Ronan M Keegan (RM)

UKRI-STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Research Complex at Harwell, Didcot OX11 0FA, United Kingdom.

Daniel J Rigden (DJ)

Institute of Structural, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Databases, Protein Protein Domains Protein Folding Proteins Deep Learning

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software
Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation

Classifications MeSH