Extraoral anatomy in CBCT – a literature review. Part 4: Pharyngocervical region


Journal

Swiss dental journal
ISSN: 2296-6498
Titre abrégé: Swiss Dent J
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101624119

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 10 2020
Historique:
entrez: 7 10 2020
pubmed: 7 10 2020
medline: 9 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This review about extraoral anatomy depicted in cone beam computed tomography describes the pharyngocervical region. Large (≥ 8 × 8 cm) field of views of the maxilla and/or mandible will inevita-bly depict the pharyngocervical region that com-prises the posterior upper airway, the pharyngeal part of the digestive tract, as well as the cervical segment of the spine. The latter consists of seven cervical vertebrae (C1-C7) with corresponding distinctive features, i.e., the atlas (C1) and the axis (C2). In addition, cervical vertebrae serve as ref-erences for the vertical position of anatomical structures. For instance, C4 is a typical landmark since it generally denotes the level of the chin, of the body of the hyoid bone, of the base of the epiglottis, and of the bifurcation of the common carotid artery, respectively. The pharynx, which is functionally involved in respiration, deglutition, and vocalization, extends from the lower aspect of the skull base to the esophagus. Anatomically, the pharynx is divided into three segments, i.e. the nasopharynx, the oropharynx, and the laryn-gopharynx. All communicate anteriorly with cor-responding cavities, i.e. the nasal cavities, the oral cavity, and the larynx. Although not directly located within the pharyngocervical region, the hyoid bone and the styloid process are also dis-cussed in this review, since both structures are commonly visible on CBCT images of this region.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33021766
pii: sdj-2020-10-01

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

768-784

Auteurs

Thomas von Arx (T)

Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland

Scott Lozanoff (S)

Department of Anatomy, Biochemistry and Physiology, John A. Burns School of Medi-cine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA

Michael M. Bornstein (MM)

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiol-ogy, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The Uni-versity of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
Department of Oral Health & Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Articles similaires

Effect of soft tissue thickness on accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques.

Eman Mostafa Awad, Mohamed Maamoun ElSheikh, Azza Abd El Moneim El-Segai
1.00
Dental Impression Technique Humans Dental Implants Computer-Aided Design Dental Impression Materials
Osteogenesis, Distraction Humans Feasibility Studies Augmented Reality Mandible
Humans Finite Element Analysis Malocclusion, Angle Class II Biomechanical Phenomena Male
Humans Aged Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging Soft Tissue Neoplasms

Classifications MeSH