Performance Status Restriction in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials.


Journal

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
ISSN: 1540-1413
Titre abrégé: J Natl Compr Canc Netw
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101162515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 07 03 2020
accepted: 16 04 2020
entrez: 6 10 2020
pubmed: 7 10 2020
medline: 5 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patients with good performance status (PS) tend to be favored in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), possibly limiting the generalizability of trial findings. We aimed to characterize trial-related factors associated with the use of PS eligibility criteria and analyze patient accrual breakdown by PS. Adult, therapeutic, multiarm phase III cancer-specific RCTs were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov. PS data were extracted from articles. Trials with a PS restriction ECOG score ≤1 were identified. Factors associated with PS restriction were determined, and the use of PS restrictions was analyzed over time. In total, 600 trials were included and 238,213 patients had PS data. Of those trials, 527 studies (87.8%) specified a PS restriction cutoff, with 237 (39.5%) having a strict inclusion criterion (ECOG PS ≤1). Enrollment criteria restrictions based on PS (ECOG PS ≤1) were more common among industry-supported trials (P<.001) and lung cancer trials (P<.001). Nearly half of trials that led to FDA approval included strict PS restrictions. Most patients enrolled across all trials had an ECOG PS of 0 to 1 (96.3%). Even among trials that allowed patients with ECOG PS ≥2, only 8.1% of those enrolled had a poor PS. Trials of lung, breast, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary cancers all included <5% of patients with poor PS. Finally, only 4.7% of patients enrolled in trials that led to subsequent FDA approval had poor PS. Use of PS restrictions in oncologic RCTs is pervasive, and exceedingly few patients with poor PS are enrolled. The selective accrual of healthier patients has the potential to severely limit and bias trial results. Future trials should consider a wider cancer population with close toxicity monitoring to ensure the generalizability of results while maintaining patient safety.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patients with good performance status (PS) tend to be favored in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), possibly limiting the generalizability of trial findings. We aimed to characterize trial-related factors associated with the use of PS eligibility criteria and analyze patient accrual breakdown by PS.
METHODS
Adult, therapeutic, multiarm phase III cancer-specific RCTs were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov. PS data were extracted from articles. Trials with a PS restriction ECOG score ≤1 were identified. Factors associated with PS restriction were determined, and the use of PS restrictions was analyzed over time.
RESULTS
In total, 600 trials were included and 238,213 patients had PS data. Of those trials, 527 studies (87.8%) specified a PS restriction cutoff, with 237 (39.5%) having a strict inclusion criterion (ECOG PS ≤1). Enrollment criteria restrictions based on PS (ECOG PS ≤1) were more common among industry-supported trials (P<.001) and lung cancer trials (P<.001). Nearly half of trials that led to FDA approval included strict PS restrictions. Most patients enrolled across all trials had an ECOG PS of 0 to 1 (96.3%). Even among trials that allowed patients with ECOG PS ≥2, only 8.1% of those enrolled had a poor PS. Trials of lung, breast, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary cancers all included <5% of patients with poor PS. Finally, only 4.7% of patients enrolled in trials that led to subsequent FDA approval had poor PS.
CONCLUSIONS
Use of PS restrictions in oncologic RCTs is pervasive, and exceedingly few patients with poor PS are enrolled. The selective accrual of healthier patients has the potential to severely limit and bias trial results. Future trials should consider a wider cancer population with close toxicity monitoring to ensure the generalizability of results while maintaining patient safety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33022640
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7578
pii: jnccn20103
pmc: PMC9671537
mid: NIHMS1849294
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1322-1326

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227517
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

JAMA Oncol. 2015 Sep;1(6):778-84
pubmed: 26203912
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Nov;20(11):2679-85
pubmed: 22314971
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Feb;3(2):125-9
pubmed: 18303431
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Jun;32A(7):1135-41
pubmed: 8758243
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1364-70
pubmed: 8648395
Lung Cancer. 2012 Sep;77(3):545-9
pubmed: 22633939
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 1;23(1):175-83
pubmed: 15625371
Cancer. 2002 Apr 1;94(7):1961-7
pubmed: 11932898
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):998
pubmed: 26335750
Br J Cancer. 1993 Apr;67(4):773-5
pubmed: 8471434
Br J Surg. 2000 Mar;87(3):362-73
pubmed: 10718954
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3745-3752
pubmed: 28968168
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:11-18
pubmed: 31099681
Thorax. 1990 Dec;45(12):951-6
pubmed: 2177921
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):e335-41
pubmed: 25118208
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1027-1037
pubmed: 28296618
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2720-6
pubmed: 15187053
Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Mar;59(3):695-701
pubmed: 28718335
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1769-1773
pubmed: 31158272

Auteurs

Joseph Abi Jaoude (J)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Ramez Kouzy (R)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Walker Mainwaring (W)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Timothy A Lin (TA)

The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Austin B Miller (AB)

The University of Texas Health Science Center McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas.

Amit Jethanandani (A)

The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee.

Andres F Espinoza (AF)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Dario Pasalic (D)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Vivek Verma (V)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Noam A VanderWalde (NA)

West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Memphis, Tennessee.

Benjamin D Smith (BD)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Grace L Smith (GL)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

C David Fuller (CD)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Prajnan Das (P)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Bruce D Minsky (BD)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Claus Rödel (C)

University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Consortium, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.

Emmanouil Fokas (E)

University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Consortium, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.

Reshma Jagsi (R)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and.

Charles R Thomas (CR)

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Ishwaria M Subbiah (IM)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Cullen M Taniguchi (CM)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Ethan B Ludmir (EB)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH