Membranes for Modelling Cardiac Tissue Stiffness In Vitro Based on Poly(trimethylene carbonate) and Poly(ethylene glycol) Polymers.
cardiomyocyte contraction
cardiotoxicity
drug screening
poly(ethylene glycol)
poly(trimethylene carbonate)
Journal
Membranes
ISSN: 2077-0375
Titre abrégé: Membranes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101577807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2020
03 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
08
09
2020
revised:
29
09
2020
accepted:
01
10
2020
entrez:
7
10
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
8
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the increased expenditure of the pharmaceutical industry on research and development, the number of drugs for cardiovascular diseases that reaches the market is decreasing. A major issue is the limited ability of the current in vitro and experimental animal models to accurately mimic human heart disease, which hampers testing of the efficacy of potential cardiac drugs. Moreover, many non-heart-related drugs have severe adverse cardiac effects, which is a major cause of drugs' retraction after approval. A main hurdle of current in vitro models is their inability to mimic the stiffness of in vivo cardiac tissue. For instance, poly(styrene) petri dishes, which are often used in these models, have a Young's modulus in the order of GPa, while the stiffness of healthy human heart tissue is <50 kPa. In pathological conditions, such as scarring and fibrosis, the stiffness of heart tissue is in the >100 kPa range. In this study, we focus on developing new membranes, with a set of properties for mimicry of cardiac tissue stiffness in vitro, based on methacrylate-functionalized macromers and triblock-copolymers of poly(trimethylene carbonate) and poly(ethylene glycol). The new membranes have Young's moduli in the hydrated state ranging from 18 kPa (healthy tissue) to 2.5 MPa (pathological tissue), and are suitable for cell contraction studies using human pluripotent stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes. The membranes with higher hydrophilicity have low drug adsorption and low Young's moduli and could be suitable for drug screening applications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33022962
pii: membranes10100274
doi: 10.3390/membranes10100274
pmc: PMC7650615
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : ZonMw
ID : MKMD 114022507
Références
J Med Chem. 2002 Jun 6;45(12):2615-23
pubmed: 12036371
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 Jan 8;482(2):323-328
pubmed: 27856254
Circulation. 2010 Mar 2;121(8):979-88
pubmed: 20159832
Acta Biomater. 2016 Feb;31:80-88
pubmed: 26687979
J Cell Sci. 2008 Nov 15;121(Pt 22):3794-802
pubmed: 18957515
Anal Chem. 2012 May 1;84(9):3938-44
pubmed: 22444457
Biomaterials. 2019 Apr;198:3-26
pubmed: 30343824
Dev Cell. 2018 Feb 5;44(3):326-336.e3
pubmed: 29396114
Biomaterials. 2006 Mar;27(9):1741-8
pubmed: 16221493
Biomacromolecules. 2016 May 9;17(5):1582-92
pubmed: 27077699
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2015;60(1):3-11
pubmed: 25818155
Cell Rep. 2015 Oct 27;13(4):733-745
pubmed: 26489474
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2020 Apr;141:54-64
pubmed: 32205183
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014 Jun 1;306(11):H1525-39
pubmed: 24682394
Lab Chip. 2006 Dec;6(12):1484-6
pubmed: 17203151
Circ Res. 2008 Aug 15;103(4):340-2
pubmed: 18635822
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2008 Aug;65(8):641-51
pubmed: 18561184
J Phys Condens Matter. 2010 May 19;22(19):194116
pubmed: 20454525
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1991 Jul;23(7):817-32
pubmed: 1791632
Cardiovasc Res. 2008 Jun 1;78(3):505-14
pubmed: 18281373
J Biomol Screen. 2009 Feb;14(2):194-202
pubmed: 19196703
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001 Mar 1;46(1-3):3-26
pubmed: 11259830
Nat Protoc. 2018 Dec;13(12):3018-3041
pubmed: 30413796
Am J Pathol. 2012 Dec;181(6):2030-7
pubmed: 23159216
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596
pubmed: 31992061
J Clin Invest. 2008 Dec;118(12):3870-80
pubmed: 19033658
Eur J Pharmacol. 2016 Nov 5;790:28-35
pubmed: 27395800
J Clin Invest. 2013 Sep;123(9):3701-3
pubmed: 23999445
Biomaterials. 2010 Jun;31(17):4639-56
pubmed: 20303169