Factors associated with subcentimeter pulmonary nodule outcomes followed with computed tomography imaging in oncology patients.
Pulmonary metastasis
Small lung nodules
Thoracic CT scan
Journal
European journal of radiology open
ISSN: 2352-0477
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101650225
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
23
06
2020
accepted:
24
08
2020
entrez:
7
10
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
8
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Technological advancements in computed tomography (CT) have enabled the frequent detection of small pulmonary nodules (PNs), especially in patients with an oncologic history. It is important the malignant versus benign etiology of PNs be determined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the behavior and clinical/radiological characteristics of subcentimeter PNs detected by CT in oncologic patients. An observational, longitudinal, retrospective and single-center study was conducted with a sample of 100 patients with a diagnosis of a primary malignant solid tumor outside of the lungs who developed indeterminate subcentimeter PNs (n = 251) detected on consecutive thoracic CT scans from 2015 to 2017. Follow-up CTs for each patients were examined in each of three periods (0-3 months, 3-6 months, and 6 months to 1 year). In our study sample, 28 patients (28 %) showed one or more signs suspicious of pulmonary metastasis, including ≥50 % PN growth, nodule growth followed by size reduction in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and the appearance of multiple nodules. The majority (56 %) of the PNs were detected during the 3-6-month follow-up CT scan. PNs with irregular, lobuled, or spiculated margins exhibited faster growth than PNs with regular, smooth margins. Malignancy of PNs was found to be significantly associated with being male, a primary colorectal cancer diagnosis, and advanced stage disease. Our findings reinforce the necessity of an individualized CT follow-up strategy for patients with an oncologic history, as well as the importance of early nodule screening, with the inter-scan interval being dependent on the primary neoplasm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33024797
doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100266
pii: S2352-0477(20)30055-1
pmc: PMC7528186
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100266Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2535-42
pubmed: 12815140
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Jan;113(1):37-49
pubmed: 9011700
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;14(2):156-61
pubmed: 22159255
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):507-14
pubmed: 24555586
Thorax. 2003 Nov;58(11):920-36
pubmed: 14586042
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243
pubmed: 28240562
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):4022-30
pubmed: 23812771
Radiology. 2000 Oct;217(1):257-61
pubmed: 11012454
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1332-41
pubmed: 25282285
Radiographics. 2001 Mar-Apr;21(2):403-17
pubmed: 11259704
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Dec;5(12):1958-62
pubmed: 20978449
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Jul;10(4):272-8
pubmed: 15220751
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):484-92
pubmed: 23436835
Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):108S-130S
pubmed: 17873164
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):152-7
pubmed: 20828958
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 Feb;10(2):240-65
pubmed: 22308518