Adequacy of hemodialysis in acute kidney injury: Real-time monitoring of dialysate ultraviolet absorbance vs. blood-based Kt/Vurea.
Chronic kidney disease
dialysis dose
renal replacement therapy
standard of care
urea kinetics
Journal
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis
ISSN: 1542-4758
Titre abrégé: Hemodial Int
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101093910
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2019
revised:
08
09
2020
accepted:
12
09
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
7
10
2021
entrez:
7
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current guidelines recommend monitoring the adequacy of hemodialysis (HD) treatments in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Blood-based methods for calculating urea such as reduction ratio (URR) and single-pool Kt/Vurea (spKt/Vurea) require pre- and post-HD blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measurements. This study aims to compare real-time monitoring of urea clearance using dialysate ultraviolet absorbance (UV) with laboratory-measured spKt/Vurea. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study among hospitalized patients with AKI, who required intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Those patients whose dialysis dose was simultaneously monitored by spKt/Vurea and UV-absorbance (UV-spKt/Vurea) were included in the study. The statistical correlation between both methods was assessed by means of the Pearson moment product correlation, Mann-Whitney U-test and Bland-Altman analysis of agreement. Thirty patients with AKI were evaluated. There was no statistical difference between the mean spKt/Vurea calculated by traditional methods and the mean UV-spKt/Vurea. (1.37 ± 0.37 vs. 1.28 ± 0.36, P = 0.12, CI: 95%). A Pearson moment correlation analysis revealed a close agreement between both methods (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis showed that >95% of the data points were confined within the upper and lower levels of agreement. In this pilot study of patients with AKI, UV-spKt/Vurea correlated with standard blood-based spKt/Vurea and may be a useful tool to monitor dialysis adequacy. Larger studies evaluating multiple UV and blood-based measurements per patient and a more diverse AKI population are needed to confirm this initial observation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Current guidelines recommend monitoring the adequacy of hemodialysis (HD) treatments in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Blood-based methods for calculating urea such as reduction ratio (URR) and single-pool Kt/Vurea (spKt/Vurea) require pre- and post-HD blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measurements. This study aims to compare real-time monitoring of urea clearance using dialysate ultraviolet absorbance (UV) with laboratory-measured spKt/Vurea.
METHODS
We conducted a single-center, retrospective study among hospitalized patients with AKI, who required intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Those patients whose dialysis dose was simultaneously monitored by spKt/Vurea and UV-absorbance (UV-spKt/Vurea) were included in the study. The statistical correlation between both methods was assessed by means of the Pearson moment product correlation, Mann-Whitney U-test and Bland-Altman analysis of agreement.
RESULTS
Thirty patients with AKI were evaluated. There was no statistical difference between the mean spKt/Vurea calculated by traditional methods and the mean UV-spKt/Vurea. (1.37 ± 0.37 vs. 1.28 ± 0.36, P = 0.12, CI: 95%). A Pearson moment correlation analysis revealed a close agreement between both methods (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis showed that >95% of the data points were confined within the upper and lower levels of agreement.
CONCLUSION
In this pilot study of patients with AKI, UV-spKt/Vurea correlated with standard blood-based spKt/Vurea and may be a useful tool to monitor dialysis adequacy. Larger studies evaluating multiple UV and blood-based measurements per patient and a more diverse AKI population are needed to confirm this initial observation.
Substances chimiques
Dialysis Solutions
0
Urea
8W8T17847W
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43-49Informations de copyright
© 2020 International Society for Hemodialysis.
Références
Dennen P, Douglas IS, Anderson R. Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: An update and primer for the intensivist. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:261-275.
Ronco C, Cruz D, Oudemans van Straaten H, et al. Dialysis dose in acute kidney injury: No time for therapeutic nihilism--a critical appraisal of the acute renal failure trial network study. Crit Care. 2008;12:308.
Daugirdas JT. Bedside formulas for k.t/V. a kinder, gentler approach to urea kinetic modeling. ASAIO Trans. 1989;35:336-338.
Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:649-672.
Liang KV, Zhang JH, Palevsky PM. Urea reduction ratio may be a simpler approach for measurement of adequacy of intermittent hemodialysis in acute kidney injury. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:82.
Salisbury AC, Reid KJ, Alexander KP, et al. Diagnostic blood loss from phlebotomy and hospital-acquired anemia during acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1646-1653.
Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Depner TA, et al. Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: Effects of age, race, and gender. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1108-1119.
Vijayan A, Palevsky PM. Dosing of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59:569-576.
Bouchard J, Macedo E, Mehta RL. Dosing of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: Lessons learned from clinical trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:570-579.
Basile C, Lomonte C. Kt/V urea does not tell it all. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1284-1287.
Mehta AN, Fenves AZ. Hemodialysis adequacy: A review. Dial Transplant. 2010;39:20-22.
Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: An analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4:1205-1213.
Daugirdas JT, Tattersall JE. Automated monitoring of hemodialysis adequacy by dialysis machines: Potential benefits to patients and cost savings. Kidney Int. 2010;78:833-835.
Castellarnau A, Werner M, Gunthner R, Jakob M. Real-time Kt/V determination by ultraviolet absorbance in spent dialysate: Technique validation. Kidney Int. 2010;78:920-925.
Uhlin F, Fridolin I, Magnusson M, Lindberg LG. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:2225-2231.
Ross EA, Paugh-Miller JL, Nappo RW. Interventions to improve hemodialysis adequacy: Protocols based on real-time monitoring of dialysate solute clearance. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11:394-399.
Chan CT, Blankestijn PJ, Dember LM, et al. Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: Conclusions from a Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 2019;96:37-47.
National Kidney F. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:884-930.
Vlatkovic V, Stojimirovic B. Determination of the delivered hemodialysis dose using standard methods and on-line clearance monitoring. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2006;63:743-747.
Schoots AC, Homan HR, Gladdines MM, Cramers CA, de Smet R, Ringoir SM. Screening of UV-absorbing solutes in uremic serum by reversed phase HPLC--change of blood levels in different therapies. Clin Chim Acta. 1985;146:37-51.
Wadher SJ, Pathankar PR, Puranik M, Ganjiwale RO, Yeole PG. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of paracetamol and metoclopramide hydrochloride in solid dosage form. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2008;70:393-395.
Tanner R, Arund J, Fridolin I, Luman M. Paracetamol interference in uric acid levels in uremic patients revealed by monitoring spent dialysate. ISRN Nephrol. 2013;2013:515292.
Fridolin I, Lindberg LG. On-line monitoring of solutes in dialysate using wavelength-dependent absorption of ultraviolet radiation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:263-270.