Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) for Fast Imaging of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 3 T.
Carotid arteries
ICA stenosis
Magnetic resonance angiography
Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
Vertebral arteries
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
12
05
2020
accepted:
02
09
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
7
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate a novel flow-independent 3D isotropic REACT sequence compared with CE-MRA for the imaging of extracranial arteries in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This was a retrospective study of 35 patients who underwent a stroke protocol at 3 T including REACT (fixed scan time: 2:46 min) and CE-MRA of the extracranial arteries. Three radiologists evaluated scans regarding vessel delineation, signal, and contrast and assessed overall image noise and artifacts using 5-point scales (5: excellent delineation/no artifacts). Apparent signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (aSNR/aCNR) were measured for the common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA, C1 segment), and vertebral artery (V2 segment). Two radiologists graded the degree of proximal ICA stenosis. Compared to REACT, CE-MRA showed better delineation for the CCA and ICA (C1 and C2 segments) (median 5, range 2-5 vs. 4, range 3-5; P < 0.05). For the ICA (C1 and C2 segments), REACT provided a higher signal (5, range 3-5; P < 0.05/4.5, range 3-5; P > 0.05 vs. 4, range 2-5) and contrast (5, range 3-5 vs. 4, range 2-5; P > 0.05) than CE-MRA. The remaining segments of the blood-supplying vessels showed equal medians. There was no significant difference regarding artifacts, whereas REACT provided significantly lower image noise (4, range 3-5 vs. 4 range 2-5; P < 0.05) with a higher aSNR (P < 0.05) and aCNR (P < 0.05) for all vessels combined. For clinically relevant (≥50%) ICA stenosis, REACT achieved a detection sensitivity of 93.75% and a specificity of 100%. Given its fast acquisition, comparable image quality to CE-MRA and high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ICA stenosis, REACT was proven to be a clinically applicable method to assess extracranial arteries in AIS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33026511
doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00963-6
pii: 10.1007/s00062-020-00963-6
pmc: PMC8463375
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
815-826Informations de copyright
© 2020. The Author(s).
Références
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(7):e164-e175
pubmed: 30267462
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jan;30(1):42-5
pubmed: 18653688
Radiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:508715
pubmed: 24778875
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2009 Nov;18(6):519-25
pubmed: 19623065
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0171704
pubmed: 28187173
Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):20-43
pubmed: 18566168
Stroke. 2005 Jan;36(1):38-43
pubmed: 15569881
Stroke. 2001 Oct;32(10):2282-6
pubmed: 11588314
Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):600-9
pubmed: 17255428
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;37(1):315-329
pubmed: 32852711
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Dec;30(4):705-712
pubmed: 31598760
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;39(9):1710-1716
pubmed: 30115678
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2011 May;21(2):259-83, x
pubmed: 21640299
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1529-1537
pubmed: 31395666
Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar;25(1):41-8
pubmed: 24384680
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Aug;26(2):375-85
pubmed: 17622966
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Feb;79(2):683-691
pubmed: 28470792
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Dec;62(6):1574-84
pubmed: 19785017
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1182-95
pubmed: 17969013
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov;63:137-146
pubmed: 31425807
Stroke. 1999 Jul;30(7):1444-9
pubmed: 10390321
Eur Radiol. 2009 Nov;19(11):2654-62
pubmed: 19449013
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;50(6):1798-1807
pubmed: 31077477
Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):187-93
pubmed: 8090890
Magn Reson Med. 2016 May;75(5):2072-7
pubmed: 26072706
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Jun 30;19(1):48
pubmed: 28662717
Magn Reson Med. 1999 Nov;42(5):952-62
pubmed: 10542355
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jan 23;22(1):8
pubmed: 31969137
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):229-33
pubmed: 27224028
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Nov;46(5):955-62
pubmed: 11675648
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jan;65(1):96-107
pubmed: 20860006
Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2228-35
pubmed: 23591617
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):924-5
pubmed: 26599932
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):543-58
pubmed: 18777528
Circulation. 1999 Nov 30;100(22):2284-301
pubmed: 10578005
Eur Radiol. 2011 Aug;21(8):1667-76
pubmed: 21476128
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2237-48
pubmed: 18556586
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;26(6):754-62
pubmed: 18440746
Radiology. 2012 Aug;264(2):414-22
pubmed: 22550309
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571