Individual mandibular movement registration and reproduction using an optoeletronic jaw movement analyzer and a dedicated robot: a dental technique.


Journal

BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 10 2020
Historique:
received: 15 05 2020
accepted: 20 09 2020
entrez: 8 10 2020
pubmed: 9 10 2020
medline: 30 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fully adjustable articulators and pantographs record and reproduce individual mandibular movements. Although these instruments are accurate, they are operator-dependant and time-consuming. Pantographic recording is affected by inter and intra operator variability in the individuation of clinical reference points and afterwards in reading pantographic recording themselves. Finally only border movements can be reproduced. Bionic Jaw Motion system is based on two components: a jaw movement analyzer and a robotic device that accurately reproduces recorded movements. The jaw movement analyzer uses an optoelectronic motion system technology made of a high frequency filming camera that acquires 140frames per second and a custom designed software that recognizes and determines the relative distance at each point in time of markers with known geometries connected to each jaw. Circumferential modified retainers connect markers and do not cover any occlusal surfaces neither obstruct occlusion. The recording process takes 5 to 10 s. Mandibular movement performance requires six degrees of freedom of movement, 3 rotations and 3 translations. Other robots are based on the so-called delta mechanics that use several parallel effectors to perform desired movements in order to decompose a complex trajectory into multiple more simple linear movements. However, each parallel effector introduces mechanical inter-component tolerances and mathematical transformations that are required to transform a recorded movement into the combination of movements to be performed by each effector. Bionic Jaw Motion Robot works differently, owing to three motors that perform translational movements and three other motors that perform rotations as a gyroscope. This configuration requires less mechanical components thus reducing mechanical tolerances and production costs. Both the jaw movement analyzer and the robot quantify the movement of the mandible as a rigid body with six degrees of freedom. This represents an additional advantage as no mathematical transformation is needed for the robot to reproduce recorded movements. Based on the described procedure, Bionic Jaw Motion provide accurate recording and reproduction of maxillomandibular relation in static and dynamic conditions. This robotic system represents an important advancement compared to available analogical and digital alternatives both in clinical and research contexts for cost reduction, precision and time saving opportunities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Fully adjustable articulators and pantographs record and reproduce individual mandibular movements. Although these instruments are accurate, they are operator-dependant and time-consuming. Pantographic recording is affected by inter and intra operator variability in the individuation of clinical reference points and afterwards in reading pantographic recording themselves. Finally only border movements can be reproduced.
METHODS
Bionic Jaw Motion system is based on two components: a jaw movement analyzer and a robotic device that accurately reproduces recorded movements. The jaw movement analyzer uses an optoelectronic motion system technology made of a high frequency filming camera that acquires 140frames per second and a custom designed software that recognizes and determines the relative distance at each point in time of markers with known geometries connected to each jaw. Circumferential modified retainers connect markers and do not cover any occlusal surfaces neither obstruct occlusion. The recording process takes 5 to 10 s. Mandibular movement performance requires six degrees of freedom of movement, 3 rotations and 3 translations. Other robots are based on the so-called delta mechanics that use several parallel effectors to perform desired movements in order to decompose a complex trajectory into multiple more simple linear movements. However, each parallel effector introduces mechanical inter-component tolerances and mathematical transformations that are required to transform a recorded movement into the combination of movements to be performed by each effector. Bionic Jaw Motion Robot works differently, owing to three motors that perform translational movements and three other motors that perform rotations as a gyroscope. This configuration requires less mechanical components thus reducing mechanical tolerances and production costs. Both the jaw movement analyzer and the robot quantify the movement of the mandible as a rigid body with six degrees of freedom. This represents an additional advantage as no mathematical transformation is needed for the robot to reproduce recorded movements.
RESULTS
Based on the described procedure, Bionic Jaw Motion provide accurate recording and reproduction of maxillomandibular relation in static and dynamic conditions.
CONCLUSION
This robotic system represents an important advancement compared to available analogical and digital alternatives both in clinical and research contexts for cost reduction, precision and time saving opportunities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33028288
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01257-6
pii: 10.1186/s12903-020-01257-6
pmc: PMC7542888
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

271

Références

J Prosthodont. 1999 Sep;8(3):209-11
pubmed: 10740504
J Prosthet Dent. 1976 Jun;35(6):630-42
pubmed: 1066474
J Prosthodont. 1999 Dec;8(4):277-80
pubmed: 10895682
J Prosthet Dent. 1975 Oct;34(4):397-404
pubmed: 1100807
Dent Clin North Am. 1979 Apr;23(2):259-70
pubmed: 285902
J Prosthodont. 2017 Dec;26(8):688-695
pubmed: 26855195
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Feb;61(2):155-60
pubmed: 2715947
J Prosthodont. 2016 Feb;25(2):156-69
pubmed: 25754238
J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Apr;55(4):427-9
pubmed: 3457176
J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Jan;63(1):120-124
pubmed: 30446410
J Oral Rehabil. 1976 Oct;3(4):353-8
pubmed: 1068246
J Dent Res. 1990 Feb;69(2):473-6
pubmed: 2307750
Med Etika Bioet. 2002 Spring-Summer;9(1-2):12-9
pubmed: 16276663
J Prosthet Dent. 1973 Mar;29(3):269-75
pubmed: 4510587
J Prosthodont. 2009 Dec;18(8):703-10
pubmed: 19754645
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Oct;40(5):1118-21
pubmed: 9328882
J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Jun;23(6):401-8
pubmed: 8809695
Aust Dent J. 1965 Apr;10(2):126-31
pubmed: 14295545
J Am Dent Assoc. 1974 Nov;89(5):1158-61
pubmed: 4529968
J Oral Rehabil. 1991 Jan;18(1):1-8
pubmed: 2051244
J Oral Rehabil. 1978 Jan;5(1):1-7
pubmed: 272438
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Aug;66(2):193-200
pubmed: 1774679

Auteurs

Massimo Carossa (M)

CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Davide Cavagnetto (D)

CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. davide.cavagnetto@gmail.com.

Paola Ceruti (P)

CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Federico Mussano (F)

CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Stefano Carossa (S)

CIR Dental School, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Articles similaires

Female Oocytes Animals Ovary Mice
Animals Animal Migration Swimming Japan Seasons
Animals Robotics Algorithms Sperm Whale Vocalization, Animal

Evidence for inbreeding depression in captive Damaraland mole-rats.

David Seager, Amy E Leedale, Jack Benjamin Thorley et al.
1.00
Animals Mole Rats Female Inbreeding Depression Male

Classifications MeSH