Use of telecritical care for family visitation to ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interview study and sentiment analysis.
critical care
human factors
qualitative research
quality improvement
visiting
Journal
BMJ quality & safety
ISSN: 2044-5423
Titre abrégé: BMJ Qual Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101546984
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
21
05
2020
revised:
03
09
2020
accepted:
18
09
2020
pubmed:
9
10
2020
medline:
24
9
2021
entrez:
8
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
When the COVID-19 pandemic restricted visitation between intensive care unit patients and their families, the virtual intensive care unit (vICU) in our large tertiary hospital was adapted to facilitate virtual family visitation. The objective of this paper is to document findings from interviews conducted with family members on three categories: (1) feelings experienced during the visit, (2) barriers, challenges or concerns faced using this service, and (3) opportunities for improvements. Family members were interviewed postvisit via phone. For category 1 (feelings), automated analysis in Python using the Valence Aware Dictionary for sentiment Reasoner package produced weighted valence (extent of positive, negative or neutral emotive connotations) of the interviewees' word choices. Outputs were compared with a manual coder's valence ratings to assess reliability. Two raters conducted inductive thematic analysis on the notes from these interviews to analyse categories 2 (barriers) and 3 (opportunities). Valence-based and manual sentiment analysis of 230 comments received on feelings showed over 86% positive sentiments (88.2% and 86.8%, respectively) with some neutral (7.3% and 6.8%) and negative (4.5% and 6.4%) sentiments. The qualitative analysis of data from 57 participants who commented on barriers showed four primary concerns: inability to communicate due to patient status (44% of respondents); technical difficulties (35%); lack of touch and physical presence (11%); and frequency and clarity of communications with the care team (11%). Suggested improvements from 59 participants included: on demand access (51%); improved communication with the care team (17%); improved scheduling processes (10%); and improved system feedback and technical capabilities (17%). Use of vICU for remote family visitations evoked happiness, joy, gratitude and relief and a sense of closure for those who lost loved ones. Identified areas for concern and improvement should be addressed in future implementations of telecritical care for this purpose.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
When the COVID-19 pandemic restricted visitation between intensive care unit patients and their families, the virtual intensive care unit (vICU) in our large tertiary hospital was adapted to facilitate virtual family visitation. The objective of this paper is to document findings from interviews conducted with family members on three categories: (1) feelings experienced during the visit, (2) barriers, challenges or concerns faced using this service, and (3) opportunities for improvements.
METHODS
Family members were interviewed postvisit via phone. For category 1 (feelings), automated analysis in Python using the Valence Aware Dictionary for sentiment Reasoner package produced weighted valence (extent of positive, negative or neutral emotive connotations) of the interviewees' word choices. Outputs were compared with a manual coder's valence ratings to assess reliability. Two raters conducted inductive thematic analysis on the notes from these interviews to analyse categories 2 (barriers) and 3 (opportunities).
RESULTS
Valence-based and manual sentiment analysis of 230 comments received on feelings showed over 86% positive sentiments (88.2% and 86.8%, respectively) with some neutral (7.3% and 6.8%) and negative (4.5% and 6.4%) sentiments. The qualitative analysis of data from 57 participants who commented on barriers showed four primary concerns: inability to communicate due to patient status (44% of respondents); technical difficulties (35%); lack of touch and physical presence (11%); and frequency and clarity of communications with the care team (11%). Suggested improvements from 59 participants included: on demand access (51%); improved communication with the care team (17%); improved scheduling processes (10%); and improved system feedback and technical capabilities (17%).
CONCLUSIONS
Use of vICU for remote family visitations evoked happiness, joy, gratitude and relief and a sense of closure for those who lost loved ones. Identified areas for concern and improvement should be addressed in future implementations of telecritical care for this purpose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33028659
pii: bmjqs-2020-011604
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011604
pmc: PMC8380894
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
715-721Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;48(4):553-561
pubmed: 32205602
Crit Care Clin. 2017 Apr;33(2):225-243
pubmed: 28284292
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):106-111
pubmed: 32282389
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 May;8(5):1489-1491
pubmed: 32220575
J Crit Care. 2001 Dec;16(4):142-9
pubmed: 11815899
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):126-133
pubmed: 29977469
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):277-82
pubmed: 11246306
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2012 Jul-Sep;35(3):216-22
pubmed: 22668993
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 3;22(9):e20143
pubmed: 32795997
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):3-14
pubmed: 30339549