Principal Component Analysis of the Well-Being at Work and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire (WWRRR) in the Mediterranean Region.
Human rights
Job satisfaction
Mediterranean area
Mental health
Principal component
Questionnaire
Wellbeing
Journal
Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH
ISSN: 1745-0179
Titre abrégé: Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 101245735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
11
2019
revised:
03
02
2020
accepted:
03
02
2020
entrez:
8
10
2020
pubmed:
9
10
2020
medline:
9
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Well-Being at Work and Respect for human Rights Questionnaire (WWRR) was conceived based on the hypothesis that the perception of respect for users' rights is an essential element of well-being in the workplace in healthcare. The objective of the study is to examine the principal components of the WWRR. A random sample representative of a set of professionals working in three different healthcare networks in Tunisia, North-Macedonia, and Italy was enrolled (n=426). Each professional completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic data and the WWRR. The WWRR consists of six items on beliefs about: satisfaction at work, users' satisfaction, organization at work, respect of users' and staff human rights, adequacy of resources. A seventh item assesses the perceived needs of personnel. Correlation between the items was evaluated by analysing the principal components with Varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization (which included all components with an Eigen value> 1). A single factor covered over 50% of the variance, all the items of the questionnaire were closely related and compose a single factor. Tunisia presented some differences regarding the item about the human rights of staff. Satisfaction with the respect for the rights of users is strongly correlated with the other factors that are part of the concept of the organizational well-being of health care providers. The WWRR provides a means of measuring this important and often neglected dimension.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Well-Being at Work and Respect for human Rights Questionnaire (WWRR) was conceived based on the hypothesis that the perception of respect for users' rights is an essential element of well-being in the workplace in healthcare. The objective of the study is to examine the principal components of the WWRR.
METHODS
METHODS
A random sample representative of a set of professionals working in three different healthcare networks in Tunisia, North-Macedonia, and Italy was enrolled (n=426). Each professional completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic data and the WWRR. The WWRR consists of six items on beliefs about: satisfaction at work, users' satisfaction, organization at work, respect of users' and staff human rights, adequacy of resources. A seventh item assesses the perceived needs of personnel. Correlation between the items was evaluated by analysing the principal components with Varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization (which included all components with an Eigen value> 1).
RESULTS
RESULTS
A single factor covered over 50% of the variance, all the items of the questionnaire were closely related and compose a single factor. Tunisia presented some differences regarding the item about the human rights of staff.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Satisfaction with the respect for the rights of users is strongly correlated with the other factors that are part of the concept of the organizational well-being of health care providers. The WWRR provides a means of measuring this important and often neglected dimension.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33029189
doi: 10.2174/1745017902016010115
pii: CPEMH-16-115
pmc: PMC7536725
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
115-124Informations de copyright
© 2020 Husky et al.
Références
Psychiatr Prax. 2013 Nov;40(8):425-9
pubmed: 23733224
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 06;13:333
pubmed: 24313930
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2015 Feb 27;11:4-11
pubmed: 25767557
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):50-61
pubmed: 28127931