Impact of early postoperative oral nutritional supplement utilization on clinical outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Colorectal surgery
Health outcomes
ICU
Infection
Malnutrition
Nutrition
Oral nutrition supplement
Pneumonia
Postoperative
Surgery
Journal
Perioperative medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 2047-0525
Titre abrégé: Perioper Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101609072
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
02
04
2020
accepted:
22
09
2020
entrez:
8
10
2020
pubmed:
9
10
2020
medline:
9
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Small randomized trials of early postoperative oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) suggest various health benefits following colorectal surgery (CRS). However, real-world evidence of the impact of early ONS on clinical outcomes in CRS is lacking. Using a nationwide administrative-financial database (Premier Healthcare Database), we examined the association between early ONS use and postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective open or laparoscopic CRS between 2008 and 2014. Early ONS was defined as the presence of charges for ONS before postoperative day (POD) 3. The primary outcome was composite infectious complications. Key secondary efficacy (intensive care unit (ICU) admission and gastrointestinal complications) and falsification (blood transfusion and myocardial infarction) outcomes were also examined. Propensity score matching was used to assemble patient groups that were comparable at baseline, and differences in outcomes were examined. Overall, patients receiving early ONS were older with greater comorbidities and more likely to be Medicare beneficiaries with malnutrition. In a well-matched sample of early ONS recipients ( Although early postoperative ONS after CRS was more likely to be utilized in elderly patients with greater comorbidities, the use of early ONS was associated with reduced infectious complications, pneumonia, ICU admission, and gastrointestinal complications. This propensity score-matched study using real-world data suggests that clinical outcomes are improved with early ONS use, a simple and inexpensive intervention in CRS patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Small randomized trials of early postoperative oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) suggest various health benefits following colorectal surgery (CRS). However, real-world evidence of the impact of early ONS on clinical outcomes in CRS is lacking.
METHODS
METHODS
Using a nationwide administrative-financial database (Premier Healthcare Database), we examined the association between early ONS use and postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective open or laparoscopic CRS between 2008 and 2014. Early ONS was defined as the presence of charges for ONS before postoperative day (POD) 3. The primary outcome was composite infectious complications. Key secondary efficacy (intensive care unit (ICU) admission and gastrointestinal complications) and falsification (blood transfusion and myocardial infarction) outcomes were also examined. Propensity score matching was used to assemble patient groups that were comparable at baseline, and differences in outcomes were examined.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, patients receiving early ONS were older with greater comorbidities and more likely to be Medicare beneficiaries with malnutrition. In a well-matched sample of early ONS recipients (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although early postoperative ONS after CRS was more likely to be utilized in elderly patients with greater comorbidities, the use of early ONS was associated with reduced infectious complications, pneumonia, ICU admission, and gastrointestinal complications. This propensity score-matched study using real-world data suggests that clinical outcomes are improved with early ONS use, a simple and inexpensive intervention in CRS patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33029348
doi: 10.1186/s13741-020-00160-6
pii: 160
pmc: PMC7534158
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
29Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsSS, BAC, and RH are employees and stockholders of Abbott. PEW has received grant funding related to this work from NIH, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Abbott, Baxter, Fresenius, Nutricia, and Takeda. PEW serves as a consultant to Abbott, Fresenius, Baxter, Cardinal Health Nutricia, and Takeda for research related to this work; received unrestricted gift donation for surgical and critical care nutrition research from Musclesound and Cosmed; and received honoraria or travel expenses for CME lectures on improving nutrition care in surgery and critical care from Abbott, Baxter, and Nutricia. DGAW receives support from NIH T32 Anesthesiology Department Research Training Grant.
Références
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Jun;15(6):696-709
pubmed: 16684165
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(21):e3704
pubmed: 27227930
World J Surg. 2008 Jul;32(7):1495-500
pubmed: 18305994
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):737-41, 741-3
pubmed: 20421041
Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;51(2):790-811
pubmed: 26293167
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Mar;212(3):385-99, 399.e1
pubmed: 21247782
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):1001-8
pubmed: 21985079
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):1-10
pubmed: 29049000
Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Apr;92(2):273-83, viii
pubmed: 22414413
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S778-85
pubmed: 26286199
Cent Eur J Immunol. 2014;39(4):532-7
pubmed: 26155175
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):15-21
pubmed: 26427941
Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):682-690
pubmed: 29200059
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):1078-87
pubmed: 25260681
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1741-7
pubmed: 26913728
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Aug;23(4):393-401
pubmed: 20337847
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jul;106(1):44-51
pubmed: 28468890
JAMA. 2013 Jan 16;309(3):241-2
pubmed: 23321761
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):626-33
pubmed: 19433995
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 22;7:CD004080
pubmed: 31329285
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1883-1895
pubmed: 29369092
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 26;367(4):292-5
pubmed: 22830460
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):224-44
pubmed: 16698152
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057-69
pubmed: 24123228
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):374-9
pubmed: 25769057
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298
pubmed: 28097305
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Ann Surg. 2009 Oct;250(4):507-13
pubmed: 19734778
Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;36(3):623-650
pubmed: 28385477
Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):79-85
pubmed: 27517331
Ann Surg. 2004 May;239(5):599-605; discussion 605-7
pubmed: 15082963
Gut. 1997 Mar;40(3):393-9
pubmed: 9135531
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Aug;22(4):279-84
pubmed: 27327244
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Dec;58(12):1164-73
pubmed: 26544814