Physiological and Behavioral Responses to Vocalization Playback in Mice.
anxiety
communication
corticosterone
low frequency
mouse
stress
ultrasonic
vocalization
Journal
Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5153
Titre abrégé: Front Behav Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
05
05
2020
accepted:
04
08
2020
entrez:
9
10
2020
pubmed:
10
10
2020
medline:
10
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In mice, the caller's production of social vocalizations has been extensively studied but the effect of these vocalizations on the listener is less understood, with playback studies to date utilizing one vocalization category or listeners of one sex. This study examines how several categories of mouse vocalizations affect listeners of both sexes to better understand the communicative functions of these vocal categories. We examined physiological and behavioral responses of male and female CBA/CaJ mice to playback of four social vocalization categories: ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), low-frequency harmonic calls, mid-frequency vocalizations, and noisy calls. Based on the conditions under which these calls are emitted, we hypothesized that playback of these vocal categories would have differential effects on the listeners. In females, playback of all four vocalization categories increased stress hormone levels (corticosterone), but only the non-USV categories increased corticosterone in males. The magnitude of corticosterone increase in non-USV trials was greater in females than in males. In open field tests, all four vocal categories decreased central ambulation in males and females, indicating an increase in anxiety-related behavior. Further, we found that the proportions of USVs emitted by subjects, but not their overall calling rates, were affected by playback of some vocal categories, suggesting that vocalization categories have different communication content. These results show that, even in the absence of behavioral and acoustic contextual features, each vocal category evokes physiological and behavioral responses in mice, with some differences in responses as a function of the listener's sex and playback signal. These findings suggest that at least some of the vocal categories have distinct communicative functions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33033474
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00155
pmc: PMC7490332
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
155Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC000937
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Niemczura, Grimsley, Kim, Alkhawaga, Poth, Carvalho and Wenstrup.
Références
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44550
pubmed: 22970247
Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):137-141
pubmed: 31996852
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Sep 4;182(2):223-30
pubmed: 17336405
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;115(4):1786-96
pubmed: 26792882
Physiol Behav. 1983 Jul;31(1):91-6
pubmed: 6685321
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 30;33(44):17538-48
pubmed: 24174686
J Vis Exp. 2015 Feb 06;(96):e52434
pubmed: 25742564
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Apr;33(4):508-15
pubmed: 18771687
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2008 Jan;47(1):8-10
pubmed: 18210991
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb 1;115(2):868-86
pubmed: 26538612
Biol Lett. 2009 Oct 23;5(5):589-92
pubmed: 19515648
Psychol Bull. 2002 Nov;128(6):961-77
pubmed: 12405139
Genes Brain Behav. 2016 Feb;15(2):243-59
pubmed: 26566793
Genes Brain Behav. 2011 Feb;10(1):35-43
pubmed: 20345893
Elife. 2015 May 28;4:
pubmed: 26020291
Stress. 2017 Sep;20(5):476-494
pubmed: 28859530
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4387
pubmed: 19209221
Horm Behav. 2000 Sep;38(2):102-10
pubmed: 10964524
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35538
pubmed: 22514749
Endocrinology. 1961 May;68:818-24
pubmed: 13756461
Behav Neural Biol. 1983 Sep;39(1):128-34
pubmed: 6661142
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2900-20
pubmed: 25695649
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 7;7(1):3017
pubmed: 28592832
Horm Behav. 1994 Dec;28(4):464-76
pubmed: 7729815
PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e386
pubmed: 16248680
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Apr 11;435(1):17-23
pubmed: 18328625
Horm Behav. 2017 Aug;94:53-60
pubmed: 28645693
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2007 Jan;46(1):28-34
pubmed: 17203913
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Mar 09;10:38
pubmed: 27014000
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Apr 01;9:76
pubmed: 25883559
Behav Brain Res. 2002 Aug 21;134(1-2):49-57
pubmed: 12191791
J Comp Psychol. 1985 Dec;99(4):420-36
pubmed: 4075780
Am J Physiol. 1963 Nov;205(5):807-15
pubmed: 4291060
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:30-8
pubmed: 24832050
Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Aug;91(8):381-5
pubmed: 15278217
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Mar;23(3):411-422
pubmed: 32066980
Brain Res. 2012 Feb 23;1439:7-14
pubmed: 22265702
Cell Tissue Res. 2013 Oct;354(1):81-97
pubmed: 23576070
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 09;6(3):e17460
pubmed: 21408007
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):357-67
pubmed: 19014259
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;11(4):605-23
pubmed: 20706857
Science. 2004 Jul 16;305(5682):404-7
pubmed: 15256672
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3412-22
pubmed: 14714820
Hear Res. 2013 Nov;305:19-30
pubmed: 23665125
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Sep 1;310:76-83
pubmed: 27142239
PLoS One. 2008 Apr 02;3(4):e1893
pubmed: 18382674
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 27;3(8):e3067
pubmed: 18728777
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40782
pubmed: 22815817
Genes Brain Behav. 2011 Feb;10(1):4-16
pubmed: 20497235