Social dominance mediates behavioral adaptation to chronic stress in a sex-specific manner.
chronic mild stress
mouse
neuroscience
principal component analysis
sex differences
social behavior
social dominance
stress
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 10 2020
09 10 2020
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
accepted:
08
10
2020
pubmed:
10
10
2020
medline:
31
3
2021
entrez:
9
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sex differences and social context independently contribute to the development of stress-related disorders. However, less is known about how their interplay might influence behavior and physiology. Here we focused on social hierarchy status, a major component of the social environment in mice, and whether it influences behavioral adaptation to chronic stress in a sex-specific manner. We used a high-throughput automated behavioral monitoring system to assess social dominance in same-sex, group-living mice. We found that position in the social hierarchy at baseline was a significant predictor of multiple behavioral outcomes following exposure to chronic stress. Crucially, this association carried opposite consequences for the two sexes. This work demonstrates the importance of recognizing the interplay between sex and social factors and enhances our understating of how individual differences shape the stress response. Most people experience chronic stress at some point in their life, which may increase their chances of developing depression or anxiety. There is evidence that chronic stress may more negatively impact the well-being of women, placing them as higher risk of developing these mental health conditions. The biological factors that underlie these differences are not well understood, which leaves clinicians and scientists struggling to develop and provide effective treatments. The social environment has a powerful influence on how people experience and cope with stress. For example, a person’s social and socioeconomic status can change their perception of and reaction to everyday stress. Researchers have found differences in how men and women relate to their social standing. One way for scientists to learn more about the biological processes involved is to study the effect of social standing and chronic stress in male and female mice. Now, Karamihalev, Brivio et al. show that social status influences the behavior of stressed mice in a sex-specific way. In the experiments, an automated observation system documented the behavior of mice living in all female or male groups. Karamihalev, Brivio et al. determined where each animal fit into the social structure of their group. Then, they exposed some groups of mice to mild chronic stress and compared their behaviors to groups of mice housed in normal conditions. They found that both the sex and social status of each played a role in how they responded to stress. For example, subordinate males displayed more anxious behavior under stressful circumstances, while dominant females acted bolder and less anxious. More studies in mice are needed to understand the biological basis of these social- and sex-based differences in stress response. Learning more may help scientists understand why some individuals are more susceptible to the effects of stress and lead to the development of personalized prevention or treatment strategies for anxiety and depression.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Most people experience chronic stress at some point in their life, which may increase their chances of developing depression or anxiety. There is evidence that chronic stress may more negatively impact the well-being of women, placing them as higher risk of developing these mental health conditions. The biological factors that underlie these differences are not well understood, which leaves clinicians and scientists struggling to develop and provide effective treatments. The social environment has a powerful influence on how people experience and cope with stress. For example, a person’s social and socioeconomic status can change their perception of and reaction to everyday stress. Researchers have found differences in how men and women relate to their social standing. One way for scientists to learn more about the biological processes involved is to study the effect of social standing and chronic stress in male and female mice. Now, Karamihalev, Brivio et al. show that social status influences the behavior of stressed mice in a sex-specific way. In the experiments, an automated observation system documented the behavior of mice living in all female or male groups. Karamihalev, Brivio et al. determined where each animal fit into the social structure of their group. Then, they exposed some groups of mice to mild chronic stress and compared their behaviors to groups of mice housed in normal conditions. They found that both the sex and social status of each played a role in how they responded to stress. For example, subordinate males displayed more anxious behavior under stressful circumstances, while dominant females acted bolder and less anxious. More studies in mice are needed to understand the biological basis of these social- and sex-based differences in stress response. Learning more may help scientists understand why some individuals are more susceptible to the effects of stress and lead to the development of personalized prevention or treatment strategies for anxiety and depression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33034286
doi: 10.7554/eLife.58723
pii: 58723
pmc: PMC7679136
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : H2020 European Research Council
ID : 260463
Pays : International
Organisme : Israel Science Foundation
ID : 1565/15 and 1916/12
Pays : International
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 01KU1501A
Pays : International
Organisme : Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
ID : Open-access funding
Pays : International
Organisme : Israel Science Foundation
ID : 1565/15
Pays : International
Organisme : Israel Science Foundation
ID : 1916/12
Pays : International
Organisme : Israeli Ministry of Health
ID : 3-11389
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Karamihalev et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SK, EB, CF, RS, MS, AC No competing interests declared
Références
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2007 Apr;28(1):28-49
pubmed: 17379284
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Aug;35(3):303-19
pubmed: 24726661
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Nov;37(11):674-82
pubmed: 25160682
Horm Behav. 2018 Feb;98:22-32
pubmed: 29187314
Genes Brain Behav. 2019 Jan;18(1):e12525
pubmed: 30311398
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 15;86(6):421-432
pubmed: 31221426
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):535-542.e1
pubmed: 29934242
Behav Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;25(5-6):372-83
pubmed: 25025701
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 1;7(1):6991
pubmed: 28765614
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 20;9(1):13650
pubmed: 31541122
Science. 2005 Apr 29;308(5722):648-52
pubmed: 15860617
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Aug;35(3):253-4
pubmed: 24882637
FASEB J. 2019 Jun;33(6):6995-7008
pubmed: 30857420
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:300-319
pubmed: 30594043
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Aug;35(3):320-30
pubmed: 24887405
Womens Health Issues. 2017 May - Jun;27(3):302-307
pubmed: 28215982
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012 Jul;32(5):709-23
pubmed: 22488525
Neuron. 2017 Sep 27;96(1):56-71
pubmed: 28957676
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Jan;42(2):379-385
pubmed: 27240659
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 26;8(1):6593
pubmed: 29700322
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169764
pubmed: 28107456
J Neurosci Res. 2017 Jan 2;95(1-2):75-82
pubmed: 27870416
J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):160-7
pubmed: 21665286
Curr Biol. 2017 Jul 24;27(14):2202-2210.e4
pubmed: 28712571
Aging Cell. 2018 Aug;17(4):e12778
pubmed: 29806171
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Sep 29;2:700-707
pubmed: 29349181
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602
pubmed: 15939837
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:190-222
pubmed: 20201874
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;70(10):1100-6
pubmed: 23986338
Biol Lett. 2016 May;12(5):
pubmed: 27194290
Elife. 2013 Sep 03;2:e00759
pubmed: 24015357
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 May;40(6):1364-72
pubmed: 25469681
Genes Brain Behav. 2020 Mar;19(3):e12643
pubmed: 31989757
Bioessays. 2018 Jul;40(7):e1800012
pubmed: 29869396
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Dec;22(12):2023-2028
pubmed: 31686022
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):565-72
pubmed: 20620164
Physiol Behav. 1987;40(6):689-93
pubmed: 3671537
Sci Rep. 2019 May 13;9(1):7324
pubmed: 31086272
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 19;16(1):1098
pubmed: 27760538
J Affect Disord. 2005 Aug;87(2-3):141-50
pubmed: 15982748