Quality Improvement Coaching for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Coverage: A Process Evaluation in 3 States, 2018-2019.
Journal
Preventing chronic disease
ISSN: 1545-1151
Titre abrégé: Prev Chronic Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101205018
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 10 2020
08 10 2020
Historique:
entrez:
9
10
2020
pubmed:
10
10
2020
medline:
27
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quality improvement (QI) coaching improves human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage, but effects of coaching have been small, and little is known about how and when QI coaching works. To assess implementation outcomes and explore factors that might explain variation in outcomes, we conducted a process evaluation of a QI coaching intervention for HPV vaccination. QI coaches received tools and training to support 4 core coaching competencies: 1) expertise in using clinic-level adolescent vaccination data to drive change, 2) knowledge of the evidence base to support change in HPV vaccination practice, 3) familiarity with improvement strategies and action planning, and 4) skill in building relationships. Our mixed methods evaluation involved collecting quantitative data through effort-tracking logs and gathering qualitative data through in-depth interviews with QI coaches (N = 11) who worked with 89 clinics in 3 US states. Data were collected on implementation outcomes and on contextual factors that might explain variations in those outcomes. Implementation outcomes included adoption by clinics, reach to providers and staff (ie, participation in the coaching visit), and implementation fidelity. States achieved either high adoption or high reach, but not both. For example, state A had high adoption with 94% of clinics accepting a coaching visit, but low reach with a median of 1 participant per clinic. In contrast, state C had lower adoption (29%, P < .01) than state A but higher reach (median of 4 participants per clinic, P < .01). Generally, states had high coaching protocol fidelity with the exception of advising on strategies and action planning. QI coaches described factors that might explain these variations, including strength of relationships with clinic staff and whether they recruited clinics directly or through large clinic networks. Our findings have implications for the design of future QI coaching initiatives, including how coaches recruit clinics to ensure full clinic engagement, refinements to coaching visits, and how QI coaches can effectively engage with clinic networks. Findings could inform future QI coaching interventions to strengthen their impact on public health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33034559
doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190410
pii: E120
pmc: PMC7553212
doi:
Substances chimiques
Papillomavirus Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E120Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA057726
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCIRD CDC HHS
ID : U01 IP001073
Pays : United States
Organisme : ACL HHS
ID : U01IP001073
Pays : United States
Références
Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):e346-53
pubmed: 25002671
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):63-74
pubmed: 22230833
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):23-31
pubmed: 29471460
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 06;10:141
pubmed: 26443999
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 29;107(6):djv086
pubmed: 25925419
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 23;68(33):718-723
pubmed: 31437143
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 18;9:21
pubmed: 24533515