A comprehensive view on mechanistic approaches for cancer risk assessment of non-genotoxic agrochemicals.
3Rs
Alternative approaches to animal testing
Carcinogenicity
Human health risk assessment
Mode of action
NAMs
New approach methodologies
Non-genotoxic carcinogens
Journal
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295
Titre abrégé: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214983
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
17
07
2020
revised:
14
09
2020
accepted:
04
10
2020
pubmed:
10
10
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
9
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Currently the only methods for non-genotoxic carcinogenic hazard assessment accepted by most regulatory authorities are lifetime carcinogenicity studies. However, these involve the use of large numbers of animals and the relevance of their predictive power and results has been scientifically challenged. With increased availability of innovative test methods and enhanced understanding of carcinogenic processes, it is believed that tumour formation can now be better predicted using mechanistic information. A workshop organised by the European Partnership on Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing brought together experts to discuss an alternative, mechanism-based approach for cancer risk assessment of agrochemicals. Data from a toolbox of test methods for detecting modes of action (MOAs) underlying non-genotoxic carcinogenicity are combined with information from subchronic toxicity studies in a weight-of-evidence approach to identify carcinogenic potential of a test substance. The workshop included interactive sessions to discuss the approach using case studies. These showed that fine-tuning is needed, to build confidence in the proposed approach, to ensure scientific correctness, and to address different regulatory needs. This novel approach was considered realistic, and its regulatory acceptance and implementation can be facilitated in the coming years through continued dialogue between all stakeholders and building confidence in alternative approaches.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33035627
pii: S0273-2300(20)30215-4
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104789
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Agrochemicals
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104789Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.