Process Evaluation of a Community-Based Microbial Larviciding Intervention for Malaria Control in Rural Tanzania.
Tanzania
implementation assessment
larval source management
malaria
microbial larvicide
process evaluation
vector control
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 10 2020
07 10 2020
Historique:
received:
28
08
2020
revised:
28
09
2020
accepted:
05
10
2020
entrez:
10
10
2020
pubmed:
11
10
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Microbial larviciding can be an effective component of integrated vector management malaria control schemes, although it is not commonly implemented. Moreover, quality control and evaluation of intervention activities are essential to evaluate the potential of community-based larviciding interventions. We conducted a process evaluation of a larval source management intervention in rural Tanzania where local staff were employed to apply microbial larvicide to mosquito breeding habitats with the aim of long-term reductions in malaria transmission. We developed a logic model to guide the process evaluation and then established quantitative indicators to measure intervention success. Quantitative analysis of intervention reach, exposure, and fidelity was performed to assess larvicide application, and interviews with larviciding staff were reviewed to provide context to quantitative results. Results indicate that the intervention was successful in terms of reach, as staff applied microbial larvicide at 80% of identified mosquito breeding habitats. However, the dosage of larvicide applied was sufficient to ensure larval elimination at only 26% of sites, which does not meet the standard set for intervention fidelity. We propose that insufficient training and protocol adaptation, environment and resource issues, and human error contributed to low larvicide application rates. This demonstrates how several small, context-specific details in sum can result in meaningful differences between intervention blueprint and execution. These findings may serve the design of other larval source management interventions by demonstrating the value of additional training, supervision, and measurement and evaluation of protocol adherence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33036350
pii: ijerph17197309
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197309
pmc: PMC7579308
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
ID : R01AI088009
Pays : International
Références
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):655-65
pubmed: 19784445
Malar J. 2007 Jun 07;6:76
pubmed: 17555570
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Nov;21(11):1468-1475
pubmed: 27500959
Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Dec;9(12):1274-89
pubmed: 15598259
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e5107
pubmed: 19333402
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):40-6
pubmed: 12571344
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 14;11(5):5137-54
pubmed: 24830448
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000;95 Suppl 1:201-6
pubmed: 11142715
J Vector Borne Dis. 2003 Mar-Jun;40(1-2):20-32
pubmed: 15119068
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Nov;11(11):1629-42
pubmed: 17054742
Malar J. 2008 Jan 25;7:20
pubmed: 18218148
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):1023
pubmed: 27686125
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 16;11(5):5317-32
pubmed: 24840349
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 30;8:113
pubmed: 24079992
Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 17;9:75
pubmed: 24935096