Three-dimensional data capture and analysis of intact eye lenses evidences emmetropia-associated changes in epithelial cell organization.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 10 2020
Historique:
received: 27 05 2020
accepted: 17 09 2020
entrez: 10 10 2020
pubmed: 11 10 2020
medline: 13 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Organ and tissue development are highly coordinated processes; lens growth and functional integration into the eye (emmetropia) is a robust example. An epithelial monolayer covers the anterior hemisphere of the lens, and its organization is the key to lens formation and its optical properties throughout all life stages. To better understand how the epithelium supports lens function, we have developed a novel whole tissue imaging system using conventional confocal light microscopy and a specialized analysis software to produce three-dimensional maps for the epithelium of intact mouse lenses. The open source software package geometrically determines the anterior pole position, the equatorial diameter, and three-dimensional coordinates for each detected cell in the epithelium. The user-friendly cell maps, which retain global lens geometry, allow us to document age-dependent changes in the C57/BL6J mouse lens cell distribution characteristics. We evidence changes in epithelial cell density and distribution in C57/BL6J mice during the establishment of emmetropia between postnatal weeks 4-6. These epithelial changes accompany a previously unknown spheroid to lentoid shape transition of the lens as detected by our analyses. When combined with key findings from previous mouse genetic and cell biological studies, we suggest a cytoskeleton-based mechanism likely underpins these observations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33037268
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73625-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-73625-9
pmc: PMC7547080
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

16898

Références

Hagen, L. A., Gilson, S. J., Akram, M. N. & Baraas, R. C. Emmetropia is maintained despite continued eye growth from 16 to 18 years of age. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60, 4178–4186 (2019).
pubmed: 31596926 doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27289 pmcid: 31596926
Sivak, J. G. The role of the lens in refractive development of the eye: Animal models of ametropia. Exp. Eye Res. 87, 3–8 (2008).
pubmed: 18405895 doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.03.001 pmcid: 18405895
Iribarren, R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 47, 86–106 (2015).
pubmed: 25683786 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.02.002 pmcid: 25683786
Bawa, G., Tkatchenko, T. V., Avrutsky, I. & Tkatchenko, A. V. Variational analysis of the mouse and rat eye optical parameters. Biomed. Opt. Express 4, 2585–2595 (2013).
pubmed: 24312744 pmcid: 3829552 doi: 10.1364/BOE.4.002585
Troilo, D. et al. Imi—report on experimental models of emmetropization and myopia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60, M31–M88 (2019).
doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25967
Hanke, F. D., Hanke, W., Scholtyssek, C. & Dehnhardt, G. Basic mechanisms in pinniped vision. Exp. Brain Res. 199, 299 (2009).
pubmed: 19396435 doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1793-6 pmcid: 19396435
Tkatchenko, T. V., Shen, Y. & Tkatchenko, A. V. Analysis of postnatal eye development in the mouse with high-resolution small animal magnetic resonance imaging. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 21–27 (2010).
doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2767
Augusteyn, R. C. Growth of the eye lens: I—weight accumulation in multiple species. Mol. Vis. 20, 410–426 (2014).
pubmed: 24715758 pmcid: 3976689
Augusteyn, R. C. Growth of the eye lens: II. Allometric studies. Mol. Vis. 20, 427–440 (2014).
pubmed: 24715759 pmcid: 3976690
Mohamed, A. & Augusteyn, R. C. Human lens weights with increasing age. Mol. Vis. 24, 867–xxx (2018).
pubmed: 30820139 pmcid: 6382474
Wu, J. J. et al. A dimensionless ordered pull-through model of the mammalian lens epithelium evidences scaling across species and explains the age-dependent changes in cell density in the human lens. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20 (2015).
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0391
Koretz, J. F., Cook, C. A. & Kuszak, J. R. The zones of discontinuity in the human lens: Development and distribution with age. Vis. Res. 34, 2955–2962 (1994).
pubmed: 7975329 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90267-4
Zhou, Y. & Shiels, A. Epha2 and Efna5 participate in lens cell pattern-formation. Differentiation 102, 1–9 (2018).
pubmed: 29800803 pmcid: 6287607 doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2018.05.002
Bassnett, S. & Šikić, H. The lens growth process. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 60, 181–200 (2017).
pubmed: 28411123 pmcid: 5605917 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.04.001
Slingsby, C. & Wistow, G. J. Functions of crystallins in and out of lens: Roles in elongated and post-mitotic cells. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 115, 52–67 (2014).
pubmed: 24582830 pmcid: 4104235 doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.02.006
Khago, D., Bierma, J. C., Roskamp, K. W., Kozlyuk, N. & Martin, R. W. Protein refractive index increment is determined by conformation as well as composition. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30, 435101 (2018).
pubmed: 30280702 pmcid: 6387658 doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aae000
Kuszak, J. R., Zoltoski, R. K. & Sivertson, C. Fibre cell organization in crystalline lenses. Exp. Eye Res. 78, 673–687 (2004).
pubmed: 15106947 doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2003.09.016 pmcid: 15106947
Šikić, H., Shi, Y., Lubura, S. & Bassnett, S. A stochastic model of eye lens growth. J. Theor. Biol. 376, 15–31 (2015).
pubmed: 25816743 pmcid: 4461006 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.03.021
Upadhya, D., Ogata, M. & Reneker, L. W. MAPK1 is required for establishing the pattern of cell proliferation and for cell survival during lens development. Development 140, 1573–1582 (2013).
pubmed: 23482492 pmcid: 3596996 doi: 10.1242/dev.081042
Garg, A. et al. Etv transcription factors functionally diverge from their upstream FGF signaling in lens development. Elife 9, e51915 (2020).
pubmed: 32043969 pmcid: 7069720 doi: 10.7554/eLife.51915
Pardue, M. T., Stone, R. A. & Iuvone, P. M. Investigating mechanisms of myopia in mice. Exp. Eye Res. 114, 96–105 (2013).
pubmed: 23305908 pmcid: 3898884 doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.12.014
Tkatchenko, T. V. et al. Photopic visual input is necessary for emmetropization in mice. Exp. Eye Res. 115, 87–95 (2013).
pubmed: 23838522 doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.06.025
Puk, O., Dalke, C., Favor, J., de Angelis, M. H. & Graw, J. Variations of eye size parameters among different strains of mice. Mamm. Genome 17, 851–857 (2006).
pubmed: 16897341 doi: 10.1007/s00335-006-0019-5
Dalke, C. et al. Lifetime study in mice after acute low-dose ionizing radiation: A multifactorial study with special focus on cataract risk. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 57, 99–113 (2018).
pubmed: 29327260 pmcid: 5902533 doi: 10.1007/s00411-017-0728-z
Von Sallmann, L. Experimental studies on early lens changes after roentgen irradiation: III. Effect of X-radiation on mitotic activity and nuclear fragmentation of lens epithelium in normal and cysteine-treated rabbits. AMA. Arch. Ophthalmol. 47, 305–320 (1952).
doi: 10.1001/archopht.1952.01700030313005
Rafferty, N. S. & Rafferty, K. A. Jr. Cell population kinetics of the mouse lens epithelium. J. Cell. Physiol. 107, 309–315 (1981).
pubmed: 7251687 doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041070302
Treton, J. A. & Courtois, Y. Evolution of the distribution, proliferation and ultraviolet repair capacity of rat lens epithelial cells as a function of maturation and aging. Mech. Ageing Dev. 15, 251–267 (1981).
pubmed: 7253715 doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(81)90134-2
Zukin, L. M. et al. Aldose reductase inhibition enhances lens regeneration in mice. Chem. Biol. Interact. 307, 58–62 (2019).
pubmed: 31026421 pmcid: 6570569 doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.04.021
Grimes, P. A., Koeberlein, B., Favor, J., Neuhduser-klaus, A. & Stambolian, D. Abnormal eye development associated with Cat4. 1863–1869 (1986).
Tkatchenko, T. V., Shah, R. L., Nagasaki, T. & Tkatchenko, A. V. Analysis of genetic networks regulating refractive eye development in collaborative cross progenitor strain mice reveals new genes and pathways underlying human myopia. BMC Med. Genom. 12, 1–24 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0560-1
Zhou, X. et al. The development of the refractive status and ocular growth in C57BL/6 mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49, 5208–5214 (2008).
doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1545
Zhang, Q. et al. Clinical description and genome wide linkage study of Y-sutural cataract and myopia in a Chinese family. Mol. Vis. 10, 890–900 (2004).
pubmed: 15570218 pmcid: 15570218
Simirskii, V. N., Lee, R. S., Wawrousek, E. F. & Duncan, M. K. Inbred FVB/N mice are mutant at the cp49/Bfsp2 locus and lack beaded filament proteins in the lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 4931–4934 (2006).
pubmed: 17065509 doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0423 pmcid: 17065509
Perng, M.-D., Zhang, Q. & Quinlan, R. A. Insights into the beaded filament of the eye lens. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 2180–2188 (2007).
pubmed: 17490642 pmcid: 5073188 doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.04.005
Liou, W. & Rafferty, N. S. Actin filament patterns in mouse lens epithelium: A study of the effects of aging, injury, and genetics. Cell Motil. 9, 17–29 (1988).
doi: 10.1002/cm.970090104
FitzGerald, P., Sun, N., Shibata, B. & Hess, J. F. Expression of the type VI intermediate filament proteins CP49 and filensin in the mouse lens epithelium. Mol. Vis. 22, 970–989 (2016).
pubmed: 27559293 pmcid: 4975932
Fudge, D. S. et al. Intermediate filaments regulate tissue size and stiffness in the murine lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 3860–3867 (2011).
pubmed: 21345981 pmcid: 3109061 doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6231
Bassnett, S., Shi, Y. & Vrensen, G. F. J. M. Biological glass: Structural determinants of eye lens transparency. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 366, 1250–64 (2011).
pubmed: 21402584 pmcid: 3061108 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0302
Land, M. F. The evolution of lenses. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 32, 449–460 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00941.x
West, J. A., Sivak, J. G. & Doughty, M. J. Microscopical evaluation of the crystalline lens of the squid (Loligo opalescens) during embryonic development. Exp. Eye Res. 60, 19–35 (1995).
pubmed: 7720802 doi: 10.1016/S0014-4835(05)80080-6 pmcid: 7720802
Gagnon, Y. L., Sutton, T. T. & Johnsen, S. Visual acuity in pelagic fishes and mollusks. Vis. Res. 92, 1–9 (2013).
pubmed: 23998988 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.08.007 pmcid: 23998988
Kröger, R. H. H. Optical plasticity in fish lenses. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 34, 78–88 (2013).
pubmed: 23262260 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.12.001 pmcid: 23262260
Irving, E. L., Sivak, J. G. & Callender, M. G. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalm. Physiol. Opt. 12, 448–456 (1992).
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00315.x
Sivak, J. G. & Dovrat, A. Aging and the optical quality of the rat crystalline lens. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24, 1162–1166 (1983).
Sivak, J. G., Herbert, K. L., Peterson, K. L. & Kuszak, J. R. The interrelationship of lens anatomy and optical quality I. Non-primate lenses. Exp. Eye Res. 59, 505–520 (1994).
pubmed: 9492753 doi: 10.1006/exer.1994.1137 pmcid: 9492753
Wallman, J., Turkel, J. & Trachtman, J. Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science (80-) 201, 1249–1251 (1978).
doi: 10.1126/science.694514
Schaeffel, F. & Feldkaemper, M. Animal models in myopia research. Clin. Exp. Optom. 98, 507–517 (2015).
pubmed: 26769177 doi: 10.1111/cxo.12312 pmcid: 26769177
Wiesel, T. N. & Raviola, E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature 266, 66–68 (1977).
pubmed: 402582 doi: 10.1038/266066a0 pmcid: 402582
Chen, Y. et al. The ciliary muscle and zonules of zinn modulate lens intracellular hydrostatic pressure through transient receptor potential vanilloid channels. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60, 4416–4424 (2019).
pubmed: 31639828 pmcid: 6808041 doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27794
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
pubmed: 22743772 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
pubmed: 5554542 pmcid: 5554542 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089

Auteurs

Alexia A Kalligeraki (AA)

Department of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Archie Isted (A)

Department of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Miguel Jarrin (M)

Department of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Alice Uwineza (A)

Department of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Robert Pal (R)

Department of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Christopher D Saunter (CD)

Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

John M Girkin (JM)

Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Boguslaw Obara (B)

Department of Computer Science, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. boguslaw.obara@durham.ac.uk.

Roy A Quinlan (RA)

Department of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. r.a.quinlan@durham.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH