Estimating appendicular muscle mass in older adults with consideration on paralysis.
anthropometric measurements
disability
estimating formula
sarcopenia
skeletal muscle mass
Journal
Geriatrics & gerontology international
ISSN: 1447-0594
Titre abrégé: Geriatr Gerontol Int
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101135738
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
23
07
2020
revised:
05
09
2020
accepted:
24
09
2020
pubmed:
11
10
2020
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
10
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to develop appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) estimating formulas that also consider the presence of paralysis for older adults and people with disabilities. This retrospective study analyzed 315 consecutive patients, post-stroke, aged ≥65 years, in a rehabilitation hospital. Six different ASM estimating formulas were developed using a five-fold cross-validation method and compared with the measured ASM obtained from bioelectrical impedance analysis. These formulas included age, gender, height, weight, arm circumference, triceps skinfold, calf circumference and presence of paralysis. Using Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), we examined the correlation between the formulas and the measured ASM. The accuracy of the ASM estimating formula for detecting decreased muscle mass was evaluated using the F-value and Matthew's correlation coefficient. Patients' mean ± SD age was 79.0 ± 8.1 years, and 51.4% of them were men. The mean ± SD bioelectrical impedance analysis-measured ASM was 13.7 ± 4.3 kg. Furthermore, 241 (76.5%) patients had decreased measured ASM. The mean adjusted R We successfully developed ASM estimating formulas using anthropometric measurements considering the presence of paralysis. Thus, these formulas are beneficial for diagnosing sarcopenia in older adults, without requiring any special equipment. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 1145-1150.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1145-1150Subventions
Organisme : the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI
ID : JP20H01144
Organisme : the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI
ID : 18K11142
Informations de copyright
© 2020 Japan Geriatrics Society.
Références
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019; 48: 16-31.
Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Orav JE, Kanis JA et al. Comparative performance of current definitions of sarcopenia against the prospective incidence of falls among community-dwelling seniors age 65 and older. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26: 2793-2802.
Schaap LA, van Schoor NM, Lips P, Visser M. Associations of sarcopenia definitions, and their components, with the incidence of recurrent falling and fractures: the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. J Gerontol 2018; 73: 1199-1204.
Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Morley JE. SARC-F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016; 7: 28-36.
Beaudart C, Biver E, Reginster JY et al. Validation of the SarQoL(R), a specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017; 8: 238-244.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet 2019; 393: 2636-2646.
Cawthon PM, Lui LY, Taylor BC et al. Clinical definitions of sarcopenia and risk of hospitalization in community-dwelling older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017; 72: 1383-1389.
Sousa AS, Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Ferreira S, Amaral TF. Financial impact of sarcopenia on hospitalization costs. Eur J Clin Nutr 2016; 70: 1046-1051.
Cao L, Morley JE. Sarcopenia is recognized as an independent condition by an international classification of disease, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) code. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17: 675-677.
Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P et al. Asian working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21: 300-307.
Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia M et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019; 10: 207-217.
Wen X, Wang M, Jiang CM, Zhang YM. Anthropometric equation for estimation of appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Chinese adults. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2011; 20: 551-556.
Visvanathan R, Yu S, Field J et al. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations. J Frailty Aging 2012; 1: 147-151.
Santos LP, Gonzalez MC, Orlandi SP et al. New prediction equations to estimate appendicular skeletal muscle mass using calf circumference: results from NHANES 1999-2006. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2019; 43: 998-1007.
Chien KY, Chen CN, Chen SC, Wang HH, Zhou WS, Chen LH. A community-based approach to lean body mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction using body circumferences in community-dwelling elderly in Taiwan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2020; 29: 94-100.
Heymsfield SB, Stanley A, Pietrobelli A, Heo M. Simple skeletal muscle mass estimation formulas: what we can learn from them. Front Endocrinol 2020; 11: 31.
Pereira PM, da Silva GA, Santos GM, Petroski EL, Geraldes AA. Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate appendicular muscle mass in elderly women. Nutr J 2013; 12: 92.
Villani AM, Crotty M, Cameron ID et al. Appendicular skeletal muscle in hospitalised hip-fracture patients: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction equations against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 857-862.
Katano S, Yano T, Ohori K et al. Novel prediction equation for appendicular skeletal muscle mass estimation in patients with heart failure: potential application in daily clinical practice. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020: 2047487320904236.
Yu S, Appleton S, Chapman I et al. An anthropometric prediction equation for appendicular skeletal muscle mass in combination with a measure of muscle function to screen for sarcopenia in primary and aged care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16: 25-30.
Scherbakov N, Sandek A, Doehner W. Stroke-related sarcopenia: specific characteristics. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16: 272-276.
Matsushita T, Nishioka S, Taguchi S, Yamanouchi A. Sarcopenia as a predictor of activities of daily living capability in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 1124-1128.
Armour BS, Courtney-Long EA, Fox MH, Fredine H, Cahill A. Prevalence and causes of paralysis-United States, 2013. Am J Public Health 2016; 106: 1855-1857.
Medical Research Council. Aids to examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum no. 45, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London. 1976.
Rodríguez JD, Pérez A, Lozano JA. Sensitivity analysis of kappa-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2010; 32: 569-575.
Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep 1966; 19: 3-11.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155-163.
Chicco D, Jurman G. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics 2020; 21: 6.
Ishida Y, Maeda K, Nonogaki T et al. Impact of edema on length of calf circumference in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 993-998.