Central nervous system metastases in breast cancer: the impact of age on patterns of development and outcome.
Age
Breast cancer
Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis
Triple negative
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
02
05
2020
accepted:
28
09
2020
pubmed:
11
10
2020
medline:
1
6
2021
entrez:
10
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to explore differences in the pattern and outcome of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in breast cancer by age at diagnosis. A retrospective database of a tertiary cancer center yielded 174 consecutive patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed with CNS metastases in 2006-2019. Data on histopathology, characteristics of CNS involvement, treatments, and survival (at three time points during the disease course) were compared between patients aged ≤ 45 and > 45 years. Pearson Chi-square or Fisher exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank test were used for statistical analyses. Study population was divided according to age at diagnosis of breast cancer. 65 patients were ≤ 45 years old and 109 patients > 45 years old. The younger group was characterized by longer median overall survival (117.1 months vs 88 months, p = 0.017) and longer interval between breast cancer diagnosis to development of CNS metastases (97.4 months vs 75.9 months, p = 0.026). Median survival after development of CNS disease was not significantly different (18.7 months vs 11.1 months, p = 0.341), although it was significantly longer in younger patients within the subgroup of patients with triple-negative disease (22.5 vs 7.9 months, p = 0.033). There were no between-group differences in number, location, and clinical presentation of CNS metastases or in systemic and CNS-directed treatment approaches. While the presentation of CNS involvement was similar between the different age groups, younger patients had significantly longer CNS-free interval and longer overall survival, and for the subgroups of triple-negative patients, younger age at breast cancer diagnosis was associated with longer survival after diagnosis of CNS disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33037977
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05959-x
pii: 10.1007/s10549-020-05959-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
423-432Références
Leyland-Jones B (2009) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and central nervous system metastases. J Clin Oncol 27:5278–5286. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8481
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8481
pubmed: 19770385
Jia J, Yu G, Jian Z, Leiping W, Biyun W, Jun C, Zhimin S, Zhonghua W (2018) Incidence, pattern and prognosis of brain metastases in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 18:446. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4371-0
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4371-0
Grasslin O, Abdulkarim BS, Coutant C, Huguet F, Gabos Z, Hsu L, Marpeau O, Uzan S, Pusztai L, Strom EA, Hortobagyi GN, Rouzier R, Ibrahim NK (2010) Nomogram to predict subsequent brain metastasis in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2032–2037. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6314
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6314
Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D et al (2012) Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 30:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0527
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0527
pubmed: 22203767
Kavouridis VK, Harary M, Hulsbergen AFC, Lo YT, Reardon DA, Aizer AA, Iorgulescu JB, Smith TR (2019) Survival and prognostic factors in surgically treated brain metastases. J Neurooncol 143:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03171-6
doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03171-6
pubmed: 30989623
Ramakrishna N, Temin S, Chandarlapaty S et al (2014) Recommendations on disease management for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer and brain metastases: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 32:2100–2108. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0955
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0955
pubmed: 24799487
pmcid: 6366342
Saip P, Cicin I, Eralp Y, Karagol H, Kucucuk S, Cosar Alas R, Yavuz E, Dincer M, Saglam E, Topuz E (2009) Identification of patients who may benefit from the prophylactic cranial radiotherapy among breast cancer patients with brain metastasis. J Neurooncol 93:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9769-0
doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9769-0
pubmed: 19099196
Tomasevic ZI, Rakocevic Z, Tomasevic ZM, Milovanovic Z, Inic M, Kolarevic D, Lukic V, Kovac Z (2012) Incidence of brain metastases in early stage HER2 3+ breast cancer patients: is there a role for brain CT in asymptomatic patients? J BUON 17:249–253
pubmed: 22740201
Pestalozzi B, Zahrieh D, Price K, International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) et al (2006) Identifying breast cancer patients at risk for central nervous system (CNS) metastases in trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Ann Oncol 17:935–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdl064
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl064
pubmed: 16603601
Lekanidi K, Evans AL, Shah J, Jaspan T, Baker L, Evans AJ (2013) Pattern of brain metastatic disease according to HER-2 and ER receptor status in breast cancer patients. Clin Radiol 68:1070–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.091
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.091
pubmed: 23827085
Maggard MA, O’Connell JB, Ke L, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Ko CY (2003) Do young breast cancer patients have worst outcome? J Surg Res 13:109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00179-3
doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00179-3
Lee HB, Han W (2014) Unique features of young age breast cancer and its management. J Breast Cancer 17:301–307. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.301
doi: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.301
pubmed: 25548576
pmcid: 4278047
Wang J, Wang J, Li Q et al (2017) Young breast cancer patients who develop distant metastasis after surgery have better survival outcomes compared to elderly counterparts. Oncotarget 8:44851–44859. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15268
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15268
pubmed: 28206957
pmcid: 5546525
Mustillo A, Ayoub J-PM, Yelle L, Florescu M (2018) Prognosis in young women under 40 with brain metastasis from breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 36(15 Suppl):1091
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.1091
Anders CK, Deal AM, Miller CR, Khorram C, Meng H, Burrows E, Livasy C, Fritchie K, Ewend MG, Perou CM, Carey LA (2010) The prognostic contribution of clinical breast cancer subtype, age and race among patients with breast cancer brain metastases. Cancer 117:1602–1611. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25746
doi: 10.1002/cncr.25746
pubmed: 21472708
pmcid: 4265570
Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, EORTC Radiotherapy, Breast Cancer Groups et al (2003) Can patient-, treatment-, and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients? Eur J Cancer 39:932–944
doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00123-0
Sheridan W, Scott T, Caroline S, Yvonne Z, Vanessa B, David V, Karen G, Stephen C (2014) Breast cancer in young women: have the prognostic implications of breast cancer subtypes changed over time? Breast Cancer Res Treat 147:617–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3125-1
doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3125-1
pubmed: 25209005
Rudat V, El-Sweilmeen H, Brune EI et al (2014) Identification of breast cancer patients with a high risk of developing brain metastases: a single-institutional retrospective analysis. BMC Cancer 14:289. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-289
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-289
pubmed: 24761771
pmcid: 4006960
Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045
pubmed: 17671126
Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California Cancer Registry. Cancer 109:1721–1728. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22618
doi: 10.1002/cncr.22618
pubmed: 17387718
McKenzie HS, Maishman T, Simmonds P, Durcan L et al (2020) Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients. Br J Cancer 122:1618–1629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z
pubmed: 32231292
Dolle JM, Daling JR, White E, Brinton LA, Doody DR, Porter PL, Malone KE (2009) Risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer in women under the age of 45 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1005
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1005
pubmed: 19336554
pmcid: 2754710
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655
doi: 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014