Effects on Acupuncturist Blinding: Different Diameters of Double-blind Acupuncture Needles.
Journal
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
ISSN: 1078-6791
Titre abrégé: Altern Ther Health Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502013
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
11
10
2020
medline:
13
10
2021
entrez:
10
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It's difficult to conduct experiments using a double-blind design in controlled clinical trials of acupuncture. To resolve this problem with blinding, we designed double-blind needles (DBNs) with stuffing to mimic the resistance felt during insertion of a regular acupuncture needle. Results of the past studies using 0.16 mm diameter DBNs found that the resistance felt by the acupuncturists during insertion successfully blinded them. The study intended to compare the effects on an acupuncturist's blinding when the practitioner used penetrating DBNs with 0.14, 0.16, 0.18, and 0.20 mm diameters. We conducted a double-blind randomized trial. The study took place at the Japan School of Acupuncture, Moxibustion. and Physiotherapy in Tokyo, Japan. The participant was one licensed acupuncturist who performed 320 needle insertions during acupuncture for 20 healthy students, who were familiar with acupuncture and who attended the Japan School of Acupuncture, Moxibustion, and Physiotherapy. The acupuncturist was informed she would administer a penetrating or non-penetrating needle; however, only penetrating needles were used. She inserted the four sizes of needles in both of each student's dorsal forearms using an alternating twirling technique. This procedure was repeated once more on another day, with at least one day between sessions. After the acupuncturist removed each needle, we asked her to guess: (1) the type of needle inserted, (2) her level of confidence in the guess, and (3) the clues that contributed to her guess. A chi-squared test was used to determine whether the ratio of correctly or incorrectly identified needles met an expected probability of 0.5 for each needle diameter. Of the 320 needle insertions, the acupuncturist correctly identified 54% of 0.14 mm, 45% of 0.16 mm, 46% of 0.18 mm, and 50% of 0.20 mm needle insertions. The correct and incorrect ratios of identified needles were fitted with a probability of 0.5, with no significant differences in the acupuncturist's confidence (P = .16). In 99% of the tests, the cue that contributed to the acupuncturist's guess was the feeling of the needle insertion. These findings indicate that the differences in the diameters of DBNs from 0.14 to 0.20 mm didn't significantly affect the acupuncturist's blinding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33038081
pii: AT6433
pmc: PMC8058780
mid: NIHMS1691430
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
62-66Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD091210
Pays : United States
Références
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jun;109(3):545-50
pubmed: 20140448
Med Acupunct. 2013 Aug;25(4):269-274
pubmed: 24761176
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Oct 10;7:31
pubmed: 17925042
J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Apr;19(4):308-12
pubmed: 23098695
J Integr Med. 2015 Jul;13(4):212-4
pubmed: 26165365
Acupunct Med. 2010 Jun;28(2):78-82
pubmed: 20458124
Med Eng Phys. 2007 May;29(4):413-31
pubmed: 16938481
Acupunct Med. 2002 Dec;20(4):175-80
pubmed: 12512791
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Jan 19;18(1):19
pubmed: 29351748
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Oct;51(10):1707-16
pubmed: 15490818
Acupunct Med. 2008 Dec;26(4):224-30
pubmed: 19098693
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;54(6):541-9
pubmed: 11377113
J Integr Med. 2018 May;16(3):164-171
pubmed: 29753429
Acupunct Med. 2010 Sep;28(3):144-8
pubmed: 20530096
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:708251
pubmed: 23533515
Lancet. 1998 Sep 19;352(9132):992
pubmed: 9752848