Food-related attentional bias and its associations with appetitive motivation and body weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Appetite Attentional bias Body weight Craving Eating Executive function Hunger Incentive value Motivation

Journal

Appetite
ISSN: 1095-8304
Titre abrégé: Appetite
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2021
Historique:
received: 29 06 2020
revised: 09 09 2020
accepted: 01 10 2020
pubmed: 12 10 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 11 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Theoretical models suggest that food-related visual attentional bias (AB) may be related to appetitive motivational states and individual differences in body weight; however, findings in this area are equivocal. We conducted a systematic review and series of meta-analyses to determine if there is a positive association between food-related AB and: (1.) body mass index (BMI) (number of effect sizes (k) = 110), (2.) hunger (k = 98), (3.) subjective craving for food (k = 35), and (4.) food intake (k = 44). Food-related AB was robustly associated with craving (r = 0.134 (95% CI 0.061, 0.208); p < .001), food intake (r = 0.085 (95% CI 0.038, 0.132); p < .001), and hunger (r = 0.048 (95% CI 0.016, 0.079); p = .003), but these correlations were small. Food-related AB was unrelated to BMI (r = 0.008 (95% CI -0.020, 0.035); p = .583) and this result was not moderated by type of food stimuli, method of AB assessment, or the subcomponent of AB that was examined. Furthermore, in a between-groups analysis (k = 22) which directly compared participants with overweight/obesity to healthy-weight control groups, there was no evidence for an effect of weight status on food-related AB (Hedge's g = 0.104, (95% CI -0.050, 0.258); p = .186). Taken together, these findings suggest that food-related AB is sensitive to changes in the motivational value of food, but is unrelated to individual differences in body weight. Our findings question the traditional view of AB as a trait-like index of preoccupation with food and have implications for novel theoretical perspectives on the role of food AB in appetite control and obesity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33039507
pii: S0195-6663(20)31608-1
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104986
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104986

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Charlotte A Hardman (CA)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: charlotte.hardman@liverpool.ac.uk.

Andrew Jones (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.

Sam Burton (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.

Jay J Duckworth (JJ)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.

Lauren S McGale (LS)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK; School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, UK.

Bethan R Mead (BR)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.

Carl A Roberts (CA)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.

Matt Field (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK.

Jessica Werthmann (J)

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Germany; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH