Dual-Task Performance: Theoretical Analysis and an Event-Coding Account.
Action
Cognitive Control
Executive functions
Journal
Journal of cognition
ISSN: 2514-4820
Titre abrégé: J Cogn
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101732790
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Sep 2020
29 Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez:
12
10
2020
pubmed:
13
10
2020
medline:
13
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Theorizing on dual- and multi-tasking has not made much progress since the early insight of Telford (1931) and Welford (1952) that response selection may represent a bottleneck in human information processing. A closer look reveals that the questions being asked in dual-task research are not particularly interesting or realistic, and the answers being given lack mechanistic detail. In fact, present theorizing can be considered mere empirical generalization, which has led to merely labeling processing bottlenecks rather than describing how they operate and how they actually produce the bottleneck. As a template for how to overcome this theoretical gap, the Theory of Event Coding (TEC) is applied to dual-task performance. It is shown that TEC, which has not been developed to account for, and has not yet been applied to dual-task performance and its deficits, can nevertheless easily account for the key findings guiding resource and stage theories, while making the underlying mechanisms explicit and transparent. It is thus suggested to consider multitasking costs a mere byproduct of the typical functioning of the cognitive system that needs no dedicated niche theorizing. Rather, what is needed is more mechanistic detail and a more integrative account that can deal with findings related to both resource theory and stage theory.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33043239
doi: 10.5334/joc.114
pmc: PMC7528664
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
29Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author has no competing interests to declare.
Références
Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44
pubmed: 7972591
Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70
pubmed: 2186425
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):228-35
pubmed: 16507063
Exp Psychol. 2018 Nov;65(6):323-331
pubmed: 30638165
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul 29;:
pubmed: 31359621
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Dec;21(12):940-949
pubmed: 29150000
Cogn Psychol. 2009 May;58(3):273-310
pubmed: 19281972
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):212-38
pubmed: 12120784
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):3-18
pubmed: 12669744
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):1072-90
pubmed: 10884010
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(2):128-33
pubmed: 19261588
Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):303-7
pubmed: 22336726
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2139-2154
pubmed: 31168699
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):343-353
pubmed: 14979809
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Sep;21(5):1339-48
pubmed: 8744967
Biol Psychol. 1997 Mar 21;45(1-3):5-18
pubmed: 9083642
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937
pubmed: 12239891
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500
pubmed: 15491903
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):393-434
pubmed: 11381835
Psychol Res. 2013 May;77(3):249-59
pubmed: 22526717
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):3-21
pubmed: 11248938
Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):512-26
pubmed: 19337749
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):43-58
pubmed: 28088534
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):821-827
pubmed: 27519674
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jul;36(2):138-202
pubmed: 9721199
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):933-42
pubmed: 17395573
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 24;7:1287
pubmed: 27605922
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):358-77
pubmed: 6242412
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Oct;24(5):1368-84
pubmed: 9988597
J Cogn Enhanc. 2017;1(2):115-121
pubmed: 32226918
Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):3-65
pubmed: 9009880
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1967;27:5-22
pubmed: 4863177
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Feb;92(2):325-36
pubmed: 17279852