Oxygenation strategies prior to and during prehospital emergency anaesthesia in UK HEMS practice (PREOXY survey).
Airway management
Apnoeic oxygenation
Emergency medical services
Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia
Pre-oxygenation
Rapid sequence induction
Journal
Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine
ISSN: 1757-7241
Titre abrégé: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101477511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Oct 2020
12 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
12
08
2020
accepted:
07
10
2020
entrez:
13
10
2020
pubmed:
14
10
2020
medline:
3
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Maintaining effective oxygenation throughout the process of Pre-Hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) is critical. There are multiple strategies available to clinicians to oxygenate patients both prior to and during PHEA. The optimal pre-oxygenation technique remains unclear, and it is unknown what techniques are being used by United Kingdom Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). This study aimed to determine the current pre- and peri-PHEA oxygenation strategies used by UK HEMS services. An electronic questionnaire survey was delivered to all UK HEMS services between 05 July and 26 December 2019. Questions investigated service standard operating procedures (SOPs) and individual clinician practice regarding oxygenation strategies prior to airway instrumentation (pre-oxygenation) and oxygenation strategies during airway instrumentation (apnoeic oxygenation). Service SOPs were obtained to corroborate questionnaire replies. Replies were received from all UK HEMS services (n = 21) and 40 individual clinicians. All services specified oxygenation strategies within their PHEA/RSI SOP and most referred to pre-oxygenation as mandatory (81%), whilst apnoeic oxygenation was mandatory in eight (38%) SOPs. The most commonly identified pre-oxygenation strategies were bag-valve-mask without PEEP (95%), non-rebreathable face mask (81%), and nasal cannula at high flow (81%). Seven (33%) services used Mapleson C circuits, whilst there were eight services (38%) that did not carry bag-valve-masks with PEEP valve nor Mapleson C circuits. All clinicians frequently used pre-oxygenation, however there was variability in clinician use of apnoeic oxygenation by nasal cannula. Nearly all clinicians (95%) reported manually ventilating patients during the apnoeic phase, with over half (58%) stating this was their routine practice. Differences in clinician pre-hospital and in-hospital practice related to availability of humidified high flow nasal oxygenation and Mapleson C circuits. Pre-oxygenation is universal amongst UK HEMS services and is most frequently delivered by bag-valve-mask without PEEP or non-rebreathable face masks, whereas apnoeic oxygenation by nasal cannula is highly variable. Multiple services carry Mapleson C circuits, however many services are unable to deliver PEEP due to the equipment they carry. Clinicians are regularly manually ventilating patients during the apnoeic phase of PHEA. The identified variability in clinical practice may indicate uncertainty and further research is warranted to assess the impact of different strategies on clinical outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Maintaining effective oxygenation throughout the process of Pre-Hospital Emergency Anaesthesia (PHEA) is critical. There are multiple strategies available to clinicians to oxygenate patients both prior to and during PHEA. The optimal pre-oxygenation technique remains unclear, and it is unknown what techniques are being used by United Kingdom Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). This study aimed to determine the current pre- and peri-PHEA oxygenation strategies used by UK HEMS services.
METHODS
METHODS
An electronic questionnaire survey was delivered to all UK HEMS services between 05 July and 26 December 2019. Questions investigated service standard operating procedures (SOPs) and individual clinician practice regarding oxygenation strategies prior to airway instrumentation (pre-oxygenation) and oxygenation strategies during airway instrumentation (apnoeic oxygenation). Service SOPs were obtained to corroborate questionnaire replies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Replies were received from all UK HEMS services (n = 21) and 40 individual clinicians. All services specified oxygenation strategies within their PHEA/RSI SOP and most referred to pre-oxygenation as mandatory (81%), whilst apnoeic oxygenation was mandatory in eight (38%) SOPs. The most commonly identified pre-oxygenation strategies were bag-valve-mask without PEEP (95%), non-rebreathable face mask (81%), and nasal cannula at high flow (81%). Seven (33%) services used Mapleson C circuits, whilst there were eight services (38%) that did not carry bag-valve-masks with PEEP valve nor Mapleson C circuits. All clinicians frequently used pre-oxygenation, however there was variability in clinician use of apnoeic oxygenation by nasal cannula. Nearly all clinicians (95%) reported manually ventilating patients during the apnoeic phase, with over half (58%) stating this was their routine practice. Differences in clinician pre-hospital and in-hospital practice related to availability of humidified high flow nasal oxygenation and Mapleson C circuits.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Pre-oxygenation is universal amongst UK HEMS services and is most frequently delivered by bag-valve-mask without PEEP or non-rebreathable face masks, whereas apnoeic oxygenation by nasal cannula is highly variable. Multiple services carry Mapleson C circuits, however many services are unable to deliver PEEP due to the equipment they carry. Clinicians are regularly manually ventilating patients during the apnoeic phase of PHEA. The identified variability in clinical practice may indicate uncertainty and further research is warranted to assess the impact of different strategies on clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33046111
doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00794-x
pii: 10.1186/s13049-020-00794-x
pmc: PMC7552361
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
99Références
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 22;7(12):e018611
pubmed: 29275345
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Aug;113(2):220-5
pubmed: 25038154
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 20;26(1):89
pubmed: 30342543
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34
pubmed: 15471760
Anaesthesia. 2017 Mar;72(3):379-390
pubmed: 28045209
Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar;70(3):323-9
pubmed: 25388828
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352
pubmed: 29406182
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 21;27(1):6
pubmed: 30665441
Anesthesiology. 1995 Feb;82(2):367-76
pubmed: 7856895
Anaesthesia. 2015 Nov;70(11):1286-306
pubmed: 26449292
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Jan-Mar;12(1):46-51
pubmed: 18189177
Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2672-5
pubmed: 16276196
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1103-1109
pubmed: 29661387
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):827-48
pubmed: 26556848
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Aug 07;23:57
pubmed: 26250700
J Clin Anesth. 2010 May;22(3):164-8
pubmed: 20400000
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):657-62
pubmed: 25540067
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):371-6
pubmed: 25536868
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 4;26(1):46
pubmed: 29866144
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):273-80
pubmed: 26426458
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):377-401
pubmed: 20507222
Anesth Analg. 1970 Jul-Aug;49(4):633-6
pubmed: 5534675
Crit Care. 2017 Feb 14;21(1):31
pubmed: 28196506
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):898-901
pubmed: 29661406
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jan 21;24:5
pubmed: 26796114
J Trauma. 2009 Jan;66(1):32-9; discussion 39-40
pubmed: 19131803
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;59(3):165-75.e1
pubmed: 22050948
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):22
pubmed: 28693491
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117 Suppl 1:i69-i74
pubmed: 26917599
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):870-871
pubmed: 30779527
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):507-517
pubmed: 28099321
Br J Anaesth. 1987 Mar;59(3):315-8
pubmed: 3828180
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):349-55
pubmed: 25447559
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):811-821
pubmed: 30779528