Blood purification therapy with a hemodiafilter featuring enhanced adsorptive properties for cytokine removal in patients presenting COVID-19: a pilot study.
Acute renal injury
IL-6
Multiorgan dysfunction
SOFA score
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 10 2020
12 10 2020
Historique:
received:
12
06
2020
accepted:
04
10
2020
entrez:
13
10
2020
pubmed:
14
10
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Systemic inflammation in COVID-19 often leads to multiple organ failure, including acute kidney injury (AKI). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in combination with sequential extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBP) might support renal function, attenuate systemic inflammation, and prevent or mitigate multiple organ dysfunctions in COVID-19. Describe overtime variations of clinical and biochemical features of critically ill patients with COVID-19 treated with EBP with a hemodiafilter characterized by enhanced cytokine adsorption properties. An observational prospective study assessing the outcome of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU (February to April 2020) treated with EBP according to local practice. Main endpoints included overtime variation of IL-6 and multiorgan function-scores, mortality, and occurrence of technical complications or adverse events. The study evaluated 37 patients. Median baseline IL-6 was 1230 pg/ml (IQR 895) and decreased overtime (p < 0.001 Kruskal-Wallis test) during the first 72 h of the treatment, with the most significant decrease in the first 24 h (p = 0.001). The reduction in serum IL-6 concentrations correlated with the improvement in organ function, as measured in the decrease of SOFA score (rho = 0.48, p = 0.0003). Median baseline SOFA was 13 (IQR 6) and decreased significantly overtime (p < 0.001 at Kruskal-Wallis test) during the first 72 h of the treatment, with the most significant decrease in the first 48 h (median 8 IQR 5, p = 0.001). Compared to the expected mortality rates, as calculated by APACHE IV, the mean observed rates were 8.3% lower after treatment. The best improvement in mortality rate was observed in patients receiving EBP early on during the ICU stay. Premature clotting (running < 24 h) occurred in patients (18.9% of total) which featured higher effluent dose (median 33.6 ml/kg/h, IQR 9) and higher filtration fraction (median 31%, IQR 7.4). No electrolyte disorders, catheter displacement, circuit disconnection, unexpected bleeding, air, or thromboembolisms due to venous cannulation of EBP were recorded during the treatment. In one case, infection of vascular access occurred during RRT, requiring replacement. EBP with heparin-coated hemodiafilter featuring cytokine adsorption properties administered to patients with COVID-19 showed to be feasible and with no adverse events. During the treatment, patients experienced serum IL-6 level reduction, attenuation of systemic inflammation, multiorgan dysfunction improvement, and reduction in expected ICU mortality rate.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Systemic inflammation in COVID-19 often leads to multiple organ failure, including acute kidney injury (AKI). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in combination with sequential extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBP) might support renal function, attenuate systemic inflammation, and prevent or mitigate multiple organ dysfunctions in COVID-19.
AIM
Describe overtime variations of clinical and biochemical features of critically ill patients with COVID-19 treated with EBP with a hemodiafilter characterized by enhanced cytokine adsorption properties.
METHODS
An observational prospective study assessing the outcome of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU (February to April 2020) treated with EBP according to local practice. Main endpoints included overtime variation of IL-6 and multiorgan function-scores, mortality, and occurrence of technical complications or adverse events.
RESULTS
The study evaluated 37 patients. Median baseline IL-6 was 1230 pg/ml (IQR 895) and decreased overtime (p < 0.001 Kruskal-Wallis test) during the first 72 h of the treatment, with the most significant decrease in the first 24 h (p = 0.001). The reduction in serum IL-6 concentrations correlated with the improvement in organ function, as measured in the decrease of SOFA score (rho = 0.48, p = 0.0003). Median baseline SOFA was 13 (IQR 6) and decreased significantly overtime (p < 0.001 at Kruskal-Wallis test) during the first 72 h of the treatment, with the most significant decrease in the first 48 h (median 8 IQR 5, p = 0.001). Compared to the expected mortality rates, as calculated by APACHE IV, the mean observed rates were 8.3% lower after treatment. The best improvement in mortality rate was observed in patients receiving EBP early on during the ICU stay. Premature clotting (running < 24 h) occurred in patients (18.9% of total) which featured higher effluent dose (median 33.6 ml/kg/h, IQR 9) and higher filtration fraction (median 31%, IQR 7.4). No electrolyte disorders, catheter displacement, circuit disconnection, unexpected bleeding, air, or thromboembolisms due to venous cannulation of EBP were recorded during the treatment. In one case, infection of vascular access occurred during RRT, requiring replacement.
CONCLUSIONS
EBP with heparin-coated hemodiafilter featuring cytokine adsorption properties administered to patients with COVID-19 showed to be feasible and with no adverse events. During the treatment, patients experienced serum IL-6 level reduction, attenuation of systemic inflammation, multiorgan dysfunction improvement, and reduction in expected ICU mortality rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33046113
doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03322-6
pii: 10.1186/s13054-020-03322-6
pmc: PMC7549343
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cytokines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
605Références
Blood Purif. 2019 Apr 11;47 Suppl 3:1-8
pubmed: 30974438
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):49
pubmed: 28474317
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220444
pubmed: 31369593
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Sep 2;13(9):1972-1988
pubmed: 28841363
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016 Jun;75(6):678-93
pubmed: 27170460
Semin Immunopathol. 2017 Jul;39(5):529-539
pubmed: 28466096
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Jun;16(6):308-310
pubmed: 32273593
Blood. 2008 Nov 15;112(10):3959-64
pubmed: 18784373
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jun 13;9(1):69
pubmed: 31197492
Kidney Int. 2020 Jul;98(1):209-218
pubmed: 32416116
J Transl Med. 2020 Apr 14;18(1):164
pubmed: 32290839
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 May 14;9(1):56
pubmed: 31089920
Blood Purif. 2019;47 Suppl 3:1-14
pubmed: 30974444
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059
pubmed: 32320003
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1157-1165
pubmed: 32345702
Acute Crit Care. 2018 Nov;33(4):216-221
pubmed: 31723888
Blood Purif. 2019;47 Suppl 3:1-6
pubmed: 30982026
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jul;8(7):738-742
pubmed: 32416769
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
Artif Organs. 2003 Mar;27(3):202-13
pubmed: 12662203
Blood Purif. 2020 May 26;:1-11
pubmed: 32454500
Blood Purif. 2019;47 Suppl 3:1-5
pubmed: 30982024
Blood Purif. 2020;49(3):255-258
pubmed: 32172242
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481
pubmed: 32105632
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2147-2156
pubmed: 32402156
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug 15;194(4):402-14
pubmed: 27337068