Cumulative live birth rates following insemination with donor spermatozoa in single women, same-sex couples and heterosexual patients.
Adult
Birth Rate
Female
Heterosexuality
/ statistics & numerical data
Homosexuality, Female
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infertility, Male
/ epidemiology
Insemination
Male
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Single Person
/ statistics & numerical data
Tissue Donors
/ statistics & numerical data
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Clinical guidelines
Cumulative live birth
Donor spermatozoa
Intrauterine insemination
Same-sex couples
Single women
Journal
Reproductive biomedicine online
ISSN: 1472-6491
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biomed Online
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101122473
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
21
04
2020
revised:
11
08
2020
accepted:
11
08
2020
pubmed:
14
10
2020
medline:
12
11
2021
entrez:
13
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
What is the cumulative live birth rate (LBR) following donor intrauterine insemination (IUI-D) treatment in a large, retrospective, single-centre cohort of single women, same-sex couples and heterosexual patients? Outcomes from 8922 treatments performed in 3333 consecutive women (45% single, 43% from same-sex and 12% from heterosexual couples) were analysed in a 13-year retrospective study from a private, HFEA-regulated UK centre between January 2004 and December 2016. A total of 795 live births resulted in an overall delivery rate of 8.9% per cycle, including 24 (3%) twins. Age-specific crude and expected cumulative LBR calculated in four age groups (<35, 35-37, 38-39 and 40-42 years) were 29, 23, 21, 12% and 66, 49, 54, 28%, respectively. A plateau was reached after six cycles, beyond which there were few additional live births. There was no significant difference in cumulative LBR between single women and same-sex couples. In a multivariate analysis, female age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.93; P < 0.0001), previous live birth following IUI-D (aOR 2.15; 95% CI 1.69-2.73; P < 0.0001) and mild stimulation (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.09-1.48; P = 0.02) had a significant effect on outcome, but relationship status or cycle rank did not. These results indicate there is little benefit performing more than six cycles of IUI-D in all women up to 40 years old, including those from same-sex relationships, while only three attempts seem reasonable in those aged 40-42 years. These results do not reflect current clinical guidelines in the UK. The authors found that consecutive IUI cycles, especially with mild stimulation, were an efficient treatment in all indications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33046376
pii: S1472-6483(20)30443-0
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1007-1014Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.