Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized controlled trial.
Adult
Aged
Amiloride
/ administration & dosage
Antihypertensive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Blood Pressure
/ drug effects
Brazil
Chlorthalidone
/ administration & dosage
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ complications
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hypertension
/ complications
Losartan
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Severity of Illness Index
Treatment Outcome
Amiloride
Chlorthalidone
Diabetes
Drug treatment
Hypertension
Losartan
Journal
Acta diabetologica
ISSN: 1432-5233
Titre abrégé: Acta Diabetol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9200299
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
03
08
2020
accepted:
23
09
2020
pubmed:
14
10
2020
medline:
16
3
2021
entrez:
13
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill with losartan, during initial management of JNC 7 Stage I hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In an a priori subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, volunteers aged 30-70 years, with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus, were randomized to 12.5/2.5 mg of chlorthalidone/amiloride (N = 47) or 50 mg of losartan (N = 50), and followed for 18 months in 21 clinical centers. If BP remained uncontrolled after three months, study medication dose was doubled, and if uncontrolled after six months, amlodipine (5 and 10 mg) and propranolol (40 and 80 mg BID) were added as open label drugs in a progressive fashion. Systolic BP decreased to a greater extent in participants allocated to diuretics compared to losartan (P < 0.001). After 18 months of follow-up, systolic BP was 128.4 ± 10.3 mmHg in the diuretic group versus 133.5 ± 8.0 in the losartan group (P < 0.01). In the diuretic group, 36 out of 43 participants (83.7%) had a JNC 7 normal BP, compared to 31/47 (66%) in the losartan group (P = 0.089). Serum cholesterol was higher in the diuretic arm at the end of the trial. Other biochemical parameters and reports of adverse events did not differ by treatment. Treatment of hypertension based on a combination of chlorthalidone and amiloride is more effective for BP lowering compared to losartan in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Clinical trials registration number: NCT00971165.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33047257
doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01611-8
pii: 10.1007/s00592-020-01611-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Amiloride
7DZO8EB0Z3
Losartan
JMS50MPO89
Chlorthalidone
Q0MQD1073Q
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00971165']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
215-220Subventions
Organisme : Agency for Funding of Studies and Projects (FINEP)
ID : 01080606/01
Organisme : Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
ID : GPPG: 08-621
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Williams B, Mancia G, Spieng W et al (2018) ESC scientific document group. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 39:3021–3104. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
pubmed: 30165516
Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2017) Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on outcome incidence in hypertension: 10 - Should blood pressure management differ in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes mellitus? Overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 35:922–944. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001276
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001276
pubmed: 28141660
Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison-Himmelfarb C et al (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension 71:e13–e115. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065
doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065
pubmed: 29133356
Fuchs FD, DiNicolantonio JJ (2015) Angiotensin receptor blockers for prevention of cardiovascular disease: where does the evidence stand? Open Heart 2:e000236. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000236
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000236
pubmed: 25893104
pmcid: 4395832
Bangalore S, Kumar S, Wetterslev J, Messerli FH (2011) Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 147 020 patients from randomised trials. BMJ 342:d2234. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2234
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2234
pubmed: 21521728
pmcid: 3082637
van Vark LC, Bertrand M, Akkerhuis KM, Brugts JJ, Fox K, Mourad JJ et al (2012) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors involving 158 998 patients. Eur Heart J 33:2088–2097. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs075
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs075
pubmed: 22511654
pmcid: 3418510
Cheng J, Zhang W, Zhang X, Han F, Li X, He X et al (2014) Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular deaths, and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 174:773–785. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.348
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.348
pubmed: 24687000
Fuchs FD, Scala LC, Vilela-Martin JF, Bandeira-de-Mello R, Mosele F, Whelton PK et al (2016) Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension: results from the PREVER-Treatment randomized trial. J Hypertens 34:798–806. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000837
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000837
pubmed: 26938814
Fuchs FD, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB, Gus M, Nóbrega AC, Poli-de-Figueiredo CE et al (2011) A comparison between diuretics and angiotensin-receptor blocker agents in patients with stage I hypertension (PREVER-Treatment trial): study protocol for a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Trials 12:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-53
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-53
pubmed: 21349192
pmcid: 3056809
Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ (2009) Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ 338:b1665. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1665
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1665
pubmed: 19454737
pmcid: 2684577
Bottino LG, Fuchs FD (2020) The role of angiotensin receptor blockers in CVD risk management. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 8:181–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2020.1750369
doi: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1750369
Fuchs FD, Whelton PK (2020) High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease. Hypertension 75:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14240
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14240
pubmed: 31865786
Fuchs FD (ed) (2018) Essentials of Hypertension. Springer, Cham
Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, Gomis R, Andersen S, Arner P (2001) The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345:870–878. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011489
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011489
pubmed: 11565519
Brenner BM, Cooper ME, Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH et al (2001) Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Eng J Med 345(12):861–869. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011161
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011161