The role of selective imidazoline receptor agonists in modern hypertension management: an international real-world survey (STRAIGHT).
Antihypertensive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Blood Pressure
/ drug effects
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Hypertension
/ drug therapy
Imidazoline Receptors
/ agonists
Lebanon
Male
Physicians
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Russia
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Arab Emirates
Selective imidazoline receptor agonists
antihypertensive medication
hypertension management
metabolic effects
obesity
real-life
sympathetic nervous system
Journal
Current medical research and opinion
ISSN: 1473-4877
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Res Opin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0351014
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
10
2020
medline:
23
6
2021
entrez:
13
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multiple pharmacologic strategies are currently available to lower blood pressure (BP). Renin-angiotensin system (RAS)-inhibitors, calcium channel blockers and diuretics are widely recommended as first line therapies. Sympathetic activation is an important contributor to BP elevation but remains unopposed or is even increased by some of these drug classes. Selective imidazoline receptor agonists (SIRAs) reduce increased central sympathetic outflow and are considered as add-on therapy in most guidelines. We conducted an international survey to evaluate contemporary hypertension management strategies in countries with high prescription rates of SIRAs to better understand the rationale and practical indications for their use in a real-world setting. Physicians from seven countries (India, Jordan, Lebanon, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates) were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire and comment on clinical case scenarios to provide information on their current practice regarding antihypertension strategies, underlying rationale for their choices, and adherence to relevant guidelines. 281 physicians completed the questionnaire including mainly cardiologists (35%) and general practitioners (32%). 96% reported using European (60%) or local (56%) guidelines in their daily practices. The majority of responding physicians (83%) had knowledge of SIRAs and 70% prescribed SIRAs regularly typically as a third line antihypertensive strategy (63%). The preferred combination partners for SIRAs were RAS-inhibitors (72%). Contemporary hypertension management varies between countries and therapeutic approaches in a real-world setting are not always in line with recommendations from available guidelines. In the countries selected for this survey prescription of SIRAs was common and appeared to be guided predominantly by considerations relating to the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism of sympathetic inhibition.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Multiple pharmacologic strategies are currently available to lower blood pressure (BP). Renin-angiotensin system (RAS)-inhibitors, calcium channel blockers and diuretics are widely recommended as first line therapies. Sympathetic activation is an important contributor to BP elevation but remains unopposed or is even increased by some of these drug classes. Selective imidazoline receptor agonists (SIRAs) reduce increased central sympathetic outflow and are considered as add-on therapy in most guidelines. We conducted an international survey to evaluate contemporary hypertension management strategies in countries with high prescription rates of SIRAs to better understand the rationale and practical indications for their use in a real-world setting.
METHODS
Physicians from seven countries (India, Jordan, Lebanon, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates) were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire and comment on clinical case scenarios to provide information on their current practice regarding antihypertension strategies, underlying rationale for their choices, and adherence to relevant guidelines.
RESULTS
281 physicians completed the questionnaire including mainly cardiologists (35%) and general practitioners (32%). 96% reported using European (60%) or local (56%) guidelines in their daily practices. The majority of responding physicians (83%) had knowledge of SIRAs and 70% prescribed SIRAs regularly typically as a third line antihypertensive strategy (63%). The preferred combination partners for SIRAs were RAS-inhibitors (72%).
CONCLUSIONS
Contemporary hypertension management varies between countries and therapeutic approaches in a real-world setting are not always in line with recommendations from available guidelines. In the countries selected for this survey prescription of SIRAs was common and appeared to be guided predominantly by considerations relating to the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism of sympathetic inhibition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33047993
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1835852
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Imidazoline Receptors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM