Developing a model of best practice for teams managing crisis in people with dementia: a consensus approach.
Best practice
Consensus
Crisis resolution team
Dementia
Fidelity
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 10 2020
13 10 2020
Historique:
received:
08
04
2020
accepted:
28
09
2020
entrez:
14
10
2020
pubmed:
15
10
2020
medline:
11
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Teams delivering crisis resolution services for people with dementia and their carers provide short-term interventions to prevent admission to acute care settings. There is great variation in these services across the UK. This article reports on a consensus process undertaken to devise a Best Practice Model and evaluation Tool for use with teams managing crisis in dementia. The Best Practice Model and Tool were developed over a three stage process: (i) Evidence gathering and generation of candidate standards (systematic review and scoping survey, interviews and focus groups); (ii) Prioritisation and selection of standards (consultation groups, a consensus conference and modified Delphi process); (iii) Refining and operationalising standards (consultation group and field-testing). One hundred sixty-five candidate standards arose from the evidence gathering stage; were refined and reduced to 90 through a consultation group exercise; and then reduced to 50 during the consensus conference and weighted using a modified Delphi process. Standards were then operationalised through a clinical consultation group and field-tested with 11 crisis teams and 5 non-crisis teams. Scores ranged from 48 to 92/100. The median score for the crisis teams was 74.5 (range 67-92), and the median score for non-crisis teams was 60 (range 48-72). With further psychometric testing, this Best Practice Model and Tool will be ideal for the planning, improvement and national benchmarking of teams managing dementia crises in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Teams delivering crisis resolution services for people with dementia and their carers provide short-term interventions to prevent admission to acute care settings. There is great variation in these services across the UK. This article reports on a consensus process undertaken to devise a Best Practice Model and evaluation Tool for use with teams managing crisis in dementia.
METHODS
The Best Practice Model and Tool were developed over a three stage process: (i) Evidence gathering and generation of candidate standards (systematic review and scoping survey, interviews and focus groups); (ii) Prioritisation and selection of standards (consultation groups, a consensus conference and modified Delphi process); (iii) Refining and operationalising standards (consultation group and field-testing).
RESULTS
One hundred sixty-five candidate standards arose from the evidence gathering stage; were refined and reduced to 90 through a consultation group exercise; and then reduced to 50 during the consensus conference and weighted using a modified Delphi process. Standards were then operationalised through a clinical consultation group and field-tested with 11 crisis teams and 5 non-crisis teams. Scores ranged from 48 to 92/100. The median score for the crisis teams was 74.5 (range 67-92), and the median score for non-crisis teams was 60 (range 48-72).
CONCLUSIONS
With further psychometric testing, this Best Practice Model and Tool will be ideal for the planning, improvement and national benchmarking of teams managing dementia crises in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33050901
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02899-0
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02899-0
pmc: PMC7552369
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
505Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0612-20004
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Programme Grants for Applied Research
ID : RP-PG-0612-20004
Références
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;26(12):1221-30
pubmed: 21351154
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):663-8
pubmed: 26796090
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Apr-Jun;17(2):4059
pubmed: 28564547
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Oct 03;12:1589-1603
pubmed: 29042760
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):427
pubmed: 27905909
J Ment Health. 2012 Jun;21(3):285-95
pubmed: 22250959
BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):134-8
pubmed: 18171718
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(2):187-201
pubmed: 31566846
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Jan;15(1):23-33
pubmed: 21271388
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 21;2:52
pubmed: 15383148
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Oct;58(10):1279-84
pubmed: 17914003
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Dec 15;230(2):709-11
pubmed: 26343832
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;24(5):449-52
pubmed: 27184072
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Aug 30;5(1):19
pubmed: 21878115
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Mar;90(1):89-100
pubmed: 30284094
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Feb;52(2):187-94
pubmed: 14728626
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970