Protecting the Ocular Surface at the Time of Cataract Surgery: Intracameral Mydriatic and Anaesthetic Combination Versus A Standard Topical Protocol.

Cataract surgery Confocal microscopy Intracameral mydriasis Ocular surface

Journal

Ophthalmology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8245
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101634502

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 04 09 2020
accepted: 30 09 2020
pubmed: 15 10 2020
medline: 15 10 2020
entrez: 14 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An intracameral mydriatic and anaesthetic combination has been approved for injection into the anterior chamber in order to provide rapid and stable mydriasis and sustained intraocular anaesthesia during cataract surgery. In this prospective study, conducted at the Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Italy, we compared phacoemulsification using the standard mydriatic-anaesthetic eye-drop protocol with that using the standard protocol in terms of corneal changes, ocular surface parameters and visual quality. Sixty patients (60 eyes) were included in the study, with 30 eyes receiving Mydrane®, a novel injectable intracameral solution, during phacoemulsification (Mydrane protocol, MP) and 30 eyes receiving the standard mydriatic-anaesthetic eye drops (standard protocol, SP). The following parameters were assessed using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM): central corneal thickness (CCT); flare and cells in the aqueous humor (Flare); keratocyte activation (KA), Langerhans' cell density (LCD), nerve fibre density (NFD) and endothelial cell density (ECD). The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, tear breakup time (TBUT) and Schirmer's test I (STI) were also evaluated. The Optical Scattering Index (OSI) and its standard deviation (OSI-SD) were assessed using the Optical Quality Analysing System (Visiometrics SL, Terrassa, Spain). In the MP group, CCT, Flare, KA and LCD values returned to baseline values within 15 postoperative days. The mean ECD and NFD decreased significantly in both groups from baseline at all follow-up assessments, with no statistically significant difference between groups. TBUT returned to the preoperative level at postoperative day 15 in the MP group. OSDI scores and STI were significantly worse in both groups at all follow-up assessments compared to baseline. At postoperative day 15 OSI and OSI-SD values were significantly better in the MP group than in the SP group. The use of Mydrane during cataract surgery showed a good safety profile and few toxic side effects, ensuring better optical quality and tear film stability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33052582
doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00311-4
pii: 10.1007/s40123-020-00311-4
pmc: PMC7708550
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1055-1067

Références

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Feb;84(1):100-4
pubmed: 16445447
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;56(2):113-8
pubmed: 22298313
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78657
pubmed: 24265705
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 3;11(10):e0152460
pubmed: 27695117
Cornea. 2007 Oct;26(9 Suppl 1):S16-20
pubmed: 17881910
Am J Ophthalmol. 1978 Mar;85(3):383-6
pubmed: 655217
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jul;41(7):1503-19
pubmed: 26287888
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Nov;39(11):1133-1139
pubmed: 31471864
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jul;45(7):910-914
pubmed: 31262481
Cornea. 2008 Sep;27 Suppl 1:S13-8
pubmed: 18813069
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;32(2):180-4
pubmed: 15068436
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 19;27(1):1-9
pubmed: 27445067
Cornea. 2018 May;37(5):587-590
pubmed: 29303887
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Aug;93(8):917-24
pubmed: 27055062
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;100(7):976-985
pubmed: 26531052
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Dec;29(12):2366-71
pubmed: 14709298
Cornea. 2011 Apr;30(4):424-8
pubmed: 20885307
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;92(5):482-5
pubmed: 23981528
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Apr 06;53(4):1792-802
pubmed: 22410563
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1413-20
pubmed: 25048505
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Feb;78(2):91-4
pubmed: 8123632
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;41(12):2635-43
pubmed: 26796444
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 3;:
pubmed: 32245849
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jul;35(7):1244-50
pubmed: 19545816
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 May;43(5):673-679
pubmed: 28602331
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jul;134(1):115-7
pubmed: 12095817
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;27(1):24-30
pubmed: 26569526
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):511-538
pubmed: 28736341
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Apr;41(2):219-223
pubmed: 29066264
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 24;53(8):4926-31
pubmed: 22695962
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Aug;37(8):1481-7
pubmed: 21782090
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010 Jul;29(4):312-34
pubmed: 20302969
Pharm Res. 1990 May;7(5):476-83
pubmed: 2367315

Auteurs

Rita Mencucci (R)

Eye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. rita.mencucci@unifi.it.

Eleonora Favuzza (E)

Eye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Giulia Scali (G)

Eye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Roberto Vignapiano (R)

Eye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Michela Cennamo (M)

Eye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Classifications MeSH