Hope and therapeutic privilege: time for shared prognosis communication.

autonomy decision-making ethics professional - professional relationship

Journal

Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 19 02 2020
revised: 08 09 2020
accepted: 08 09 2020
entrez: 15 10 2020
pubmed: 16 10 2020
medline: 16 10 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Communicating an unfavourable prognosis while maintaining patient hope represents a critical challenge for healthcare professionals (HPs). Duty requires respect for the right to patient autonomy while at the same time not doing harm by causing hopelessness and demoralisation. In some cases, the need for therapeutic privilege is discussed. The primary objectives of this study were to explore HPs' perceptions of hope in the prognosis communication and investigate how they interpret and operationalise key ethical principles. Sixteen qualitative semistructured interviews with HPs from different positions and experience, including doctors and nurses in four different departments (intensive care, oncology, palliative care, rehabilitation), were conducted in the Ticino Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. HPs defined prognosis and patient hope as interdependent concepts related to future perspectives for subjective quality of life. Two main factors allow HPs to maximise the benefits and minimise the harm of their communication: respecting the patient's timing and sharing the patient's wishes. Time is required to reframe needs and expectations. Furthermore, communication needs to be shared by HPs, patients and their relatives to build common awareness and promote a person-centred approach to prognosis. In this process, interprofessional collaboration is key: doctors and nurses are complementary and can together guarantee that patients and relatives receive information in the most appropriate form when they need it. Organisational aspects and the HPs' emotional difficulties, particularly in coping with their own despair, are barriers to effective communication that need further investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33055136
pii: medethics-2020-106157
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106157
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Nicola Grignoli (N)

Sasso Corbaro Medical Humanities Foundation, Bellinzona, Switzerland nicola.grignoli@ti.ch.
Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Service, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
Clinical Ethics Commission, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Roberta Wullschleger (R)

Sasso Corbaro Medical Humanities Foundation, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Valentina Di Bernardo (V)

Sasso Corbaro Medical Humanities Foundation, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Clinical Ethics Commission, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Mirjam Amati (M)

Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research, Lucerne/Nottwil, Switzerland.
Information and Process Management/Supportive Area, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Claudia Zanini (C)

Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research, Lucerne/Nottwil, Switzerland.
Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

Roberto Malacrida (R)

Sasso Corbaro Medical Humanities Foundation, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Sara Rubinelli (S)

Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research, Lucerne/Nottwil, Switzerland.
Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH