Safety and Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Combination Therapy for Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Propensity-Matched Study.
COVID-19
Hydroxychloroquine
SARS-CoV-2
Torsades de pointes
Journal
Cardiology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8261
Titre abrégé: Cardiol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101634495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
02
09
2020
pubmed:
16
10
2020
medline:
16
10
2020
entrez:
15
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to determine the effectiveness and safety of hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin (HCQ-AZM) therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. This was a retrospective cohort study of 613 patients hospitalized (integrated health system involving three hospitals) for RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection between March 1, 2020 and April 25, 2020. Intervention was treatment with HCQ-AZM in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest, non-lethal arrhythmias, and length of hospital stay. Secondary measures included in-hospital corrected QT (QTc) interval parameters and serum biomarkers levels. Propensity-matched groups were composed of 173 patients given HCQ-AZM and 173 matched patients who did not receive treatment. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-2.89; p = 0.2), PEA arrest (OR 1.68, CI 0.68-4.15; p = 0.27), or incidence of non-lethal arrhythmias (10.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.28). Length of hospital stay (10.5 ± 7.4 vs. 5.8 ± 6.1; p < 0.001), peak CRP levels (252 ± 136 vs. 166 ± 124; p < 0.0001), and degree of QTc interval prolongation was higher for the HCQ-AZM group (28 ± 32 vs. 9 ± 32; p < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference in incidence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (2.8% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.52). HCQ-AZM was stopped in 10 patients because of QT interval prolongation and 1 patient because of drug-related polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. In this propensity-matched study, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality, life-threatening arrhythmias, or incidence of PEA arrest between the HCQ-AZM and untreated control groups. QTc intervals were longer in patients receiving HCQ-AZM, but only one patient developed drug-related ventricular tachycardia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33058086
doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00201-7
pii: 10.1007/s40119-020-00201-7
pmc: PMC7556606
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
523-534Références
Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61
pubmed: 20925139
Circulation. 2020 Jun 16;141(24):e906-e907
pubmed: 32267732
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 May;55(5):105938
pubmed: 32171740
Clin Exp Immunol. 1995 Oct;102(1):144-51
pubmed: 7554381
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2020 May - Jun;20(3):117-120
pubmed: 32278018
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jul;13(7):1410-7
pubmed: 26921760
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Apr;55(4):105932
pubmed: 32145363
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1824-1836
pubmed: 32282022
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug 1;158(3):280-7
pubmed: 12882951
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):808-809
pubmed: 32488217
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949
pubmed: 32205204
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):732-739
pubmed: 32150618
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1456-1462
pubmed: 32244059
BMC Med. 2018 Nov 7;16(1):200
pubmed: 30400791
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;16(3):155-166
pubmed: 32034323
Pharmacotherapy. 1997 May-Jun;17(3):626-30
pubmed: 9165570
Cell Discov. 2020 Mar 18;6:16
pubmed: 32194981
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 24;3(4):e208857
pubmed: 32330277
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):888-889
pubmed: 32211771