Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib.


Journal

Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 10 2020
Historique:
received: 05 11 2019
accepted: 22 09 2020
entrez: 16 10 2020
pubmed: 17 10 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the degree to which Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was driven by patient-reported assessments of pain (Pain), physical function, and fatigue in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo, each with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). This post hoc analysis used data pooled from three randomized controlled trials in csDMARD-inadequate responder (csDMARD-IR) patients (ORAL Scan: NCT00847613; ORAL Standard: NCT00853385; ORAL Sync: NCT00856544). Using subgroup analysis from 2 × 2 tables, associations between PtGA and Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) at month 3 were evaluated using Pearson's Phi correlation coefficients. To support the main analysis, associations between select patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also evaluated in csDMARD-naïve (ORAL Start; NCT01039688) and biologic (b)DMARD-IR (ORAL Step; NCT00960440) patients. Across csDMARD-IR treatment groups, low disease activity (defined as PtGA ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in PtGA were associated with mild Pain (Visual Analog Scale score ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in Pain; lack of Pain improvement was associated with little/no improvement in PtGA. In contrast, large proportions of csDMARD-IR patients who reported PtGA improvements did not report HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ normative values (≤ 0.25 and ≥ 43.5, respectively) or changes in HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ minimum clinically important difference (≥ 0.22 and ≥ 4.0, respectively). Generally, PtGA and Pain outcomes were moderately-to-strongly correlated at month 3 in csDMARD-IR patients, with weaker correlations evident between PtGA and HAQ-DI/FACIT-F outcomes. Similar findings were generally evident in csDMARD-naïve and bDMARD-IR patients. This analysis supports the role of Pain as a key driver of PtGA in RA; physical function and fatigue play lesser roles in patients' perceptions of disease activity. These findings corroborate the importance of improved PROs and attainment of low symptom states for optimizing patient care. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009); NCT01039688 (registered: December 25, 2009); NCT00960440 (registered: August 17, 2009).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the degree to which Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was driven by patient-reported assessments of pain (Pain), physical function, and fatigue in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo, each with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs).
METHODS
This post hoc analysis used data pooled from three randomized controlled trials in csDMARD-inadequate responder (csDMARD-IR) patients (ORAL Scan: NCT00847613; ORAL Standard: NCT00853385; ORAL Sync: NCT00856544). Using subgroup analysis from 2 × 2 tables, associations between PtGA and Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) at month 3 were evaluated using Pearson's Phi correlation coefficients. To support the main analysis, associations between select patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also evaluated in csDMARD-naïve (ORAL Start; NCT01039688) and biologic (b)DMARD-IR (ORAL Step; NCT00960440) patients.
RESULTS
Across csDMARD-IR treatment groups, low disease activity (defined as PtGA ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in PtGA were associated with mild Pain (Visual Analog Scale score ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in Pain; lack of Pain improvement was associated with little/no improvement in PtGA. In contrast, large proportions of csDMARD-IR patients who reported PtGA improvements did not report HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ normative values (≤ 0.25 and ≥ 43.5, respectively) or changes in HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ minimum clinically important difference (≥ 0.22 and ≥ 4.0, respectively). Generally, PtGA and Pain outcomes were moderately-to-strongly correlated at month 3 in csDMARD-IR patients, with weaker correlations evident between PtGA and HAQ-DI/FACIT-F outcomes. Similar findings were generally evident in csDMARD-naïve and bDMARD-IR patients.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis supports the role of Pain as a key driver of PtGA in RA; physical function and fatigue play lesser roles in patients' perceptions of disease activity. These findings corroborate the importance of improved PROs and attainment of low symptom states for optimizing patient care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009); NCT01039688 (registered: December 25, 2009); NCT00960440 (registered: August 17, 2009).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33059710
doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02324-7
pii: 10.1186/s13075-020-02324-7
pmc: PMC7566034
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antirheumatic Agents 0
Piperidines 0
Pyrimidines 0
Pyrroles 0
tofacitinib 87LA6FU830

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00853385', 'NCT00960440', 'NCT00847613', 'NCT00856544', 'NCT01039688']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

243

Références

N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19
pubmed: 22873531
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Feb;64(2):206-14
pubmed: 22052672
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Jun;62(6):857-64
pubmed: 20535797
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Feb 7;2018:8564215
pubmed: 29623147
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 Sep-Oct;38(5):848-857
pubmed: 31858963
J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1720-7
pubmed: 21807792
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;69(4):592-598
pubmed: 27565000
Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-58
pubmed: 11690728
J Rheumatol. 1993 Mar;20(3):557-60
pubmed: 8478873
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Feb;62(2):181-9
pubmed: 20191516
J Rheumatol. 1994 Jan;21(1):17-27
pubmed: 7864914
J Rheumatol. 2007 May;34(5):1174-7
pubmed: 17477482
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 May-Jun;34(3):430-42
pubmed: 27156561
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Apr 15;51(2):215-21
pubmed: 15077262
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):935-42
pubmed: 21540201
Eur J Pain. 2002;6(2):161-76
pubmed: 11900476
RMD Open. 2018 Jun 28;4(1):e000695
pubmed: 30018802
J Rheumatol. 2005 May;32(5):811-9
pubmed: 15868614
Drugs. 2010;70(2):121-45
pubmed: 20108988
Cancer. 2002 Jan 15;94(2):528-38
pubmed: 11900238
J Rheumatol. 2005 Nov;32(11):2250-6
pubmed: 16265712
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Mar;50(3):953-60
pubmed: 15022339
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 19;370(25):2377-86
pubmed: 24941177
J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1699-701
pubmed: 21807788
RMD Open. 2017 Oct 25;3(2):e000551
pubmed: 29119008
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 04;17:307
pubmed: 26530039
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jan 28;18:34
pubmed: 26818974
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Apr 5;21(1):89
pubmed: 30953540
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Apr;67(4):475-83
pubmed: 25186034
JAKSTAT. 2013 Oct 1;2(4):e27638
pubmed: 24470980
J Rheumatol. 2005 Oct;32(10):2016-24
pubmed: 16206362
Drugs. 2017 Apr;77(5):521-546
pubmed: 28255960
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Sep;64(9):2814-23
pubmed: 22810704
J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21
pubmed: 18055266
J Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;42(11):2046-54
pubmed: 26233504
Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):451-60
pubmed: 23294500
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24
pubmed: 3358796
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):528-38
pubmed: 25523852
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Jun 08;13(3):R83
pubmed: 21651807
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Mar;80:106210
pubmed: 31972425
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013 Jan;15(1):300
pubmed: 23292816
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Jun;38(6):935-947
pubmed: 29564549
Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):729-40
pubmed: 8507213
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):253-61
pubmed: 24026258
J Rheumatol. 2014 May;41(5):837-52
pubmed: 24692527
RMD Open. 2016 Sep 28;2(2):e000308
pubmed: 27752357
J Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;30(4):880-3
pubmed: 12672221
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1313-1321
pubmed: 30442279
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 May 21;18(1):114
pubmed: 27209012
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):590-9
pubmed: 20461782
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7818
pubmed: 25670183
RMD Open. 2020 Feb;6(1):
pubmed: 32396519
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S14-36
pubmed: 22588741
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(3):R61
pubmed: 19413909
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Oct 28;18(1):251
pubmed: 27793211
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):559-70
pubmed: 23348607
J Rheumatol. 2008 Nov;35(11):2136-47
pubmed: 18793006
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Jun;55(6):1031-41
pubmed: 26929445
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1767-1773
pubmed: 27059693
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov;66(11):1485-90
pubmed: 17472993
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1142-9
pubmed: 21485024
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 May;73(5):902-5
pubmed: 23921994
RMD Open. 2019 Oct 1;5(2):e001040
pubmed: 31673419

Auteurs

Vibeke Strand (V)

Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Jeffrey Kaine (J)

Independent Healthcare Associates Inc, Cullowhee, NC, USA.

Rieke Alten (R)

Schlosspark-Klinik, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

Gene Wallenstein (G)

Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.

Annette Diehl (A)

Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Harry Shi (H)

Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Rebecca Germino (R)

Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.

Christopher W Murray (CW)

Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA. Christopher.W.Murray@pfizer.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH