Transpapillary tissue sampling of biliary strictures: balloon dilatation prior to forceps biopsy improves sensitivity and accuracy.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 10 2020
15 10 2020
Historique:
received:
16
08
2020
accepted:
29
09
2020
entrez:
16
10
2020
pubmed:
17
10
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The early and definitive diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenoses is essential for a timely and adequate therapy. However, tissue sampling with transpapillary brush cytology (BC) or forceps biopsy (FB) remains challenging. With this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different tissue sampling modalities (BC, FB without/after previous balloon dilatation). Standardized database research identified all patients, who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with BC and/or FB for indeterminate bile duct stenosis between January 2010 and April 2018 and with a definitive diagnosis. 218 patients were enrolled (149 cases with malignant and 69 with benign disease). FB had a significant higher sensitivity than BC (43% vs. 16%, p < 0.01). Prior balloon dilatation of the stenosis improved the sensitivity of FB from 41 to 71% (p = 0.03), the NPV from 36 to 81% (p < 0.01) and the accuracy from 55 to 87% (p < 0.01). The complication rates did not differ significantly between the modalities. In our center FB turned out to be the diagnostically more effective procedure. Balloon dilatation of the stenosis before FB had a significant diagnostic benefit and was not associated with a higher complication rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33060723
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74451-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-74451-9
pmc: PMC7566456
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17423Références
Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1813-1824.e1
pubmed: 26327129
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jan;53(1):89-92
pubmed: 11154498
Dig Endosc. 2014 Mar;26(2):276-81
pubmed: 23826684
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul;48(2):138-151
pubmed: 29876948
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1975-1984.e8
pubmed: 28274849
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4291-4297
pubmed: 28349279
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019 Apr;29(2):205-214
pubmed: 30846149
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):65-73
pubmed: 22078103
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1069-73
pubmed: 15180727
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;5(5):616-23
pubmed: 17478348
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Aug;58(2):176-82
pubmed: 12872082
J Dig Dis. 2016 Jan;17(1):44-51
pubmed: 26717051
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):71-7
pubmed: 16377319
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Feb;56(2):596-601
pubmed: 21221795
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jun;35(6):967-979
pubmed: 31802537
Pancreatology. 2020 Mar;20(2):149-157
pubmed: 31870802
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):870-6
pubmed: 12024143
Endoscopy. 2016 May;48(5):432-9
pubmed: 26808393
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):168-76
pubmed: 25440678
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):587-94
pubmed: 11677474
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 14;20(30):10495-503
pubmed: 25132767
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 21;23(35):6429-6436
pubmed: 29085192
Digestion. 2014;89(3):216-24
pubmed: 24860985
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):71-8
pubmed: 21067747
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1263-73
pubmed: 18477350
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan;102(1):107-14
pubmed: 17037993
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jul 16;6(7):312-7
pubmed: 25031790
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;4(9):711-720
pubmed: 31300360