eHealth Literacy of German Physicians in the Pre-COVID-19 Era: Questionnaire Study.
eHealth
eHealth literacy
electronic health
health apps
mobile health
mobile health apps
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 10 2020
16 10 2020
Historique:
received:
11
05
2020
accepted:
20
09
2020
revised:
07
09
2020
entrez:
16
10
2020
pubmed:
17
10
2020
medline:
24
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digitalization is a disruptive technology that changes the way we deliver diagnostic procedures and treatments in medicine. Different stakeholders have varying interests in and expectations of the digitalization of modern medicine. Many recent digital advances in the medical field, such as the implementation of electronic health records, telemedical services, and mobile health apps, are increasingly used by medical professionals and patients. During the current pandemic outbreak of a novel coronavirus-caused respiratory disease (COVID-19), many modern information and communication technologies (ICT) have been used to overcome the physical barriers and limitations caused by government-issued curfews and workforce shortages. Therefore, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in the usage of modern ICT in medicine. At the same time, the eHealth literacy of physicians working with these technologies has probably not improved since our study. This paper describes a representative cohort of German physicians before the COVID-19 pandemic and their eHealth literacy and attitude towards modern ICT. A structured, self-developed questionnaire about user behavior and attitudes towards eHealth applications was administered to a representative cohort of 93 German physicians. Of the 93 German physicians who participated in the study, 97% (90/93) use a mobile phone. Medical apps are used by 42% (39/93). Half of the surveyed physicians (47/93, 50%) use their private mobile phones for official purposes on a daily basis. Telemedicine is part of the daily routine for more than one-third (31/93, 33%) of all participants. More than 80% (76/93, 82%) of the trial participants state that their knowledge regarding the legal aspects and data safety of medical apps and cloud computing is insufficient. Modern ICT is frequently used and mostly welcomed by German physicians. However, there is a tremendous lack of eHealth literacy and knowledge about the safe and secure implementation of these technologies in routine clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Digitalization is a disruptive technology that changes the way we deliver diagnostic procedures and treatments in medicine. Different stakeholders have varying interests in and expectations of the digitalization of modern medicine. Many recent digital advances in the medical field, such as the implementation of electronic health records, telemedical services, and mobile health apps, are increasingly used by medical professionals and patients. During the current pandemic outbreak of a novel coronavirus-caused respiratory disease (COVID-19), many modern information and communication technologies (ICT) have been used to overcome the physical barriers and limitations caused by government-issued curfews and workforce shortages. Therefore, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in the usage of modern ICT in medicine. At the same time, the eHealth literacy of physicians working with these technologies has probably not improved since our study.
OBJECTIVE
This paper describes a representative cohort of German physicians before the COVID-19 pandemic and their eHealth literacy and attitude towards modern ICT.
METHODS
A structured, self-developed questionnaire about user behavior and attitudes towards eHealth applications was administered to a representative cohort of 93 German physicians.
RESULTS
Of the 93 German physicians who participated in the study, 97% (90/93) use a mobile phone. Medical apps are used by 42% (39/93). Half of the surveyed physicians (47/93, 50%) use their private mobile phones for official purposes on a daily basis. Telemedicine is part of the daily routine for more than one-third (31/93, 33%) of all participants. More than 80% (76/93, 82%) of the trial participants state that their knowledge regarding the legal aspects and data safety of medical apps and cloud computing is insufficient.
CONCLUSIONS
Modern ICT is frequently used and mostly welcomed by German physicians. However, there is a tremendous lack of eHealth literacy and knowledge about the safe and secure implementation of these technologies in routine clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33064102
pii: v8i10e20099
doi: 10.2196/20099
pmc: PMC7600010
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20099Informations de copyright
©Johanna Kirchberg, Johannes Fritzmann, Jürgen Weitz, Ulrich Bork. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 16.10.2020.
Références
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Nov;26(1):
pubmed: 31744843
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):586-593
pubmed: 28636831
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Jun 21;2(4):230-243
pubmed: 29507784
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 17;6(1):e23
pubmed: 29343463
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):826
pubmed: 31718639
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):459-461
pubmed: 32284618
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 7;26(29):4182-4197
pubmed: 32848328
PM R. 2017 May;9(5S):S106-S115
pubmed: 28527495
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):154-61
pubmed: 27410924
N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 5;381(10):956-968
pubmed: 31483966
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1452-1462
pubmed: 30304648
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 14;22(8):e15630
pubmed: 32663142
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27
pubmed: 25760773
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 7;21(10):e13585
pubmed: 31593548
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2472-2474
pubmed: 31157961
Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1310-1316
pubmed: 32329958
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 16;18(5):e97
pubmed: 27185295
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 18;5(10):e147
pubmed: 29046271
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jun 15;12(2):e20
pubmed: 20551011
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):207
pubmed: 27530343
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 06;19(1):e13
pubmed: 28062391
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 3;3:14
pubmed: 32047860
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 27;20(6):e221
pubmed: 29950290
Z Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun;45(6):487-523
pubmed: 17607616
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679-1681
pubmed: 32160451
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Aug 20;2:79
pubmed: 31453374
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 30;15(12):e277
pubmed: 24449711
Hepatology. 2020 Aug;72(2):723-728
pubmed: 32275784
J Med Internet Res. 2001 Apr-Jun;3(2):E20
pubmed: 11720962
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1271-1273
pubmed: 29617592
Lancet. 2019 Dec 22;392(10165):2665-2667
pubmed: 30545779
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):668-676
pubmed: 31412182
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 17;10(4):e42
pubmed: 19017584
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:205-9
pubmed: 27577372