Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of candidemia in critically ill patients in Germany: a single-center retrospective 10-year analysis.
Antifungal agents
Bloodstream infection
Candida species
Candidemia
Critically ill patients
Echinocandin
Fluconazole
Intensive care unit
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Oct 2020
16 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
24
06
2020
accepted:
03
10
2020
entrez:
16
10
2020
pubmed:
17
10
2020
medline:
17
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite advances in the management of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Candida spp., the mortality still remains high in critically ill patients. The worldwide epidemiology of yeast-related BSI is subject to changing species distribution and resistance patterns, challenging antifungal treatment strategies. The aim of this single-center study was to identify predictors of mortality after 28 and 180 days in a cohort of mixed surgical and medical critically ill patients with candidemia. Patients, who had been treated for laboratory-confirmed BSI caused by Candida spp. in one of 12 intensive care units (ICU) at a University hospital between 2008 and 2017, were retrospectively identified. We retrieved data including clinical characteristics, Candida species distribution, and antifungal management from electronic health records to identify risk factors for mortality at 28 and 180 days using a Cox regression model. A total of 391 patients had blood cultures positive for Candida spp. (incidence 4.8/1000 ICU admissions). The mortality rate after 28 days was 47% (n = 185) and increased to 60% (n = 234) after 180 days. Age (HR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01-1.03]), a history of liver cirrhosis (HR 1.54 [95% CI 1.07-2.20]), septic shock (HR 2.41 [95% CI 1.73-3.37]), the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score (HR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.17]), Candida score (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]), and the length of ICU stay at culture positivity (HR 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.01]) were significant risk factors for death at 180 days. Patients, who had abdominal surgery (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.91]) and patients, who received adequate (HR 0.36 [95% CI 0.24-0.52]) or non-adequate (HR 0.31 [95% CI 0.16-0.62]) antifungal treatment, had a reduced mortality risk compared to medical admission and no antifungal treatment, respectively. The mortality of critically ill patients with Candida BSI is high and is mainly determined by disease severity, multiorgan dysfunction, and antifungal management rather than species distribution and susceptibility. Our results underline the importance of timely treatment of candidemia. However, controversies remain on the optimal definition of adequate antifungal management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite advances in the management of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Candida spp., the mortality still remains high in critically ill patients. The worldwide epidemiology of yeast-related BSI is subject to changing species distribution and resistance patterns, challenging antifungal treatment strategies. The aim of this single-center study was to identify predictors of mortality after 28 and 180 days in a cohort of mixed surgical and medical critically ill patients with candidemia.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients, who had been treated for laboratory-confirmed BSI caused by Candida spp. in one of 12 intensive care units (ICU) at a University hospital between 2008 and 2017, were retrospectively identified. We retrieved data including clinical characteristics, Candida species distribution, and antifungal management from electronic health records to identify risk factors for mortality at 28 and 180 days using a Cox regression model.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 391 patients had blood cultures positive for Candida spp. (incidence 4.8/1000 ICU admissions). The mortality rate after 28 days was 47% (n = 185) and increased to 60% (n = 234) after 180 days. Age (HR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01-1.03]), a history of liver cirrhosis (HR 1.54 [95% CI 1.07-2.20]), septic shock (HR 2.41 [95% CI 1.73-3.37]), the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score (HR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.17]), Candida score (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]), and the length of ICU stay at culture positivity (HR 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.01]) were significant risk factors for death at 180 days. Patients, who had abdominal surgery (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.91]) and patients, who received adequate (HR 0.36 [95% CI 0.24-0.52]) or non-adequate (HR 0.31 [95% CI 0.16-0.62]) antifungal treatment, had a reduced mortality risk compared to medical admission and no antifungal treatment, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The mortality of critically ill patients with Candida BSI is high and is mainly determined by disease severity, multiorgan dysfunction, and antifungal management rather than species distribution and susceptibility. Our results underline the importance of timely treatment of candidemia. However, controversies remain on the optimal definition of adequate antifungal management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33064220
doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00755-8
pii: 10.1186/s13613-020-00755-8
pmc: PMC7567770
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
142Subventions
Organisme : Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
ID : WI187316
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 8;13(3):e0194210
pubmed: 29518133
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0185339
pubmed: 29045423
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2472-82
pubmed: 17568028
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Oct 19;5:35
pubmed: 27777756
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374
pubmed: 31775846
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Feb;55(2):532-8
pubmed: 21078946
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;37(12):2397-2404
pubmed: 30284179
Infection. 2016 Dec;44(6):747-755
pubmed: 27401690
J Infect. 2017 Jul;75(1):59-67
pubmed: 28366686
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jun 3;9(1):62
pubmed: 31161475
JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
pubmed: 8254858
Crit Care. 2019 Jun 14;23(1):219
pubmed: 31200780
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;74(4):323-31
pubmed: 23102556
Crit Care. 2019 May 2;23(1):150
pubmed: 31046836
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1668-1677
pubmed: 28936678
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1225-1238
pubmed: 28255613
Mycoses. 2017 Dec;60(12):770-780
pubmed: 28758337
Mycoses. 2012 Jan;55(1):73-9
pubmed: 21668521
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 4;379(14):1322-1331
pubmed: 30281988
Crit Care Med. 2009 May;37(5):1624-33
pubmed: 19325481
Mycoses. 2018 Feb;61(2):127-133
pubmed: 29024057
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jul 1;43(1):25-31
pubmed: 16758414
Am Surg. 2015 Oct;81(10):1067-73
pubmed: 26463310
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jun;40(6):839-45
pubmed: 24807083
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;13(2):199-204
pubmed: 29322386
Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):384-393
pubmed: 29189345
PLoS Pathog. 2017 May 18;13(5):e1006290
pubmed: 28542486
Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):665-70
pubmed: 21169817
Infection. 2016 Apr;44(2):205-13
pubmed: 26410297
Microbiol Immunol. 2009 Jan;53(1):41-4
pubmed: 19161556
World J Surg. 2009 Sep;33(9):1822-9
pubmed: 19551428
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):730-7
pubmed: 16505659
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Feb;41(2):285-95
pubmed: 25510301
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Jul;82(7):785-90
pubmed: 27003704
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 15;62(4):e1-50
pubmed: 26679628
Infection. 2013 Jun;41(3):645-53
pubmed: 23463186
Crit Care Med. 2018 May;46(5):705-712
pubmed: 29309369
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jun;45(6):789-805
pubmed: 30911804
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 16;6(7):ofz251
pubmed: 31334296
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0127534
pubmed: 26010361
J Hosp Infect. 2005 Oct;61(2):146-54
pubmed: 16009456
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020 Jun 22;53:e20190206
pubmed: 32578699
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Aug;54(8):3149-54
pubmed: 20498325
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):313-319
pubmed: 31915083
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Apr;68(4):927-35
pubmed: 23236102
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 28;:
pubmed: 32107534
Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):482-483
pubmed: 29474331