Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Combined With Training Volume for Estimating Training Responses in Runners.
inertial sensors
monitoring
running
training load
training response
Journal
Journal of athletic training
ISSN: 1938-162X
Titre abrégé: J Athl Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2020
01 Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
10
2020
medline:
30
4
2021
entrez:
16
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Historically, methods of monitoring training loads in runners have used simple and convenient metrics, including the duration or distance run. Changes in these values are assessed on a week-to-week basis to induce training adaptations and manage injury risk. To date, whether different measures of external loads, including biomechanical measures, provide better information regarding week-to-week changes in external loads experienced by a runner is unclear. In addition, the importance of combining internal-load measures, such as session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), with different external-load measures to monitor week-to-week changes in training load in runners is unknown. To compare week-to-week changes in the training loads of recreational runners using different quantification methods. Case series. Community based. Recreational runners in Vancouver, British Columbia. Week-to-week changes in running time, steps, and cumulative shock, in addition to the product of each of these variables and the corresponding sRPE scores for each run. Sixty-eight participants were included in the final analysis. Differences were present in week-to-week changes for running time compared with timeRPE (d = 0.24), stepsRPE (d = 0.24), and shockRPE (d = 0.31). The differences between week-to-week changes in running time and cumulative shock were also significant at the overall group level (d = 0.10). We found that the use of an internal training-load measure (sRPE) in combination with external load (training duration) provided a more individualized estimate of week-to-week changes in overall training stress. A better estimation of training stress has significant implications for monitoring training adaptations, resulting performance, and possibly injury risk reduction. We therefore recommend the regular use of sRPE and training duration to monitor training load in runners. The use of cumulative shock as a measure of external load in some runners may also be more valid than duration alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33064812
pii: 446287
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-573-19
pmc: PMC7740055
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1285-1291Informations de copyright
© by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.