Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Vaccination Regimes for Avian Influenza H9N2 in Broiler Chicken.

avian influenza broiler early infection heterologous vaccine homologous vaccine

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 29 08 2020
revised: 08 10 2020
accepted: 09 10 2020
entrez: 17 10 2020
pubmed: 18 10 2020
medline: 18 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Low pathogenic avian influenza virus is one of the major threats that has been affecting the poultry industry in the Middle East region for decades. Attempts to eradicate this disease have failed. Currently, there are commercial vaccines that are either imported or produced locally from recently circulating isolates of H9N2 in Egypt and Middle Eastern countries. This present work focused on comparing the effectiveness of two vaccines belonging to these categories in Egypt. Two commercial broiler flocks (Cobb-500 Broiler) with maternally derived immunity (MDA) against H9N2 virus were employed and placed under normal commercial field conditions or laboratory conditions. Immunity was evaluated on the basis of detectable humoral antibodies against influenza H9N2 virus, and challenge was conducted at 28 days of life using a recent wild H9N2 virus. The results showed that vaccination on the 7th day of life provided significantly higher immune response in both vaccine types, with significantly lower virus shedding compared to vaccination at day 1 of life, regardless of field or laboratory conditions. In addition, the vaccine produced from a recent local H9N2 isolate (MEFLUVAC-H9-16) provided a significantly higher humoral immune response under both field and laboratory conditions, as measured by serology and virus shedding (number of shedders and amount of shedding virus), being significantly lower following challenge on the 28th day of life, contrary to the imported H9 vaccine. In conclusion, use of H9N2 vaccine at 7 days of life provided a significantly higher protection than vaccination at day 1 of life in birds with MDA, suggesting vaccination regimes between 5-8-days of life for broiler chicks with MDA. Moreover, use of a vaccine prepared from a recently circulating H9N2 virus showed significantly higher protection and was more suitable for birds in the Middle East.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33066560
pii: ani10101875
doi: 10.3390/ani10101875
pmc: PMC7602138
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
ID : Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2020/96)

Références

Avian Pathol. 2018 Oct;47(5):467-478
pubmed: 29897786
Avian Pathol. 2017 Oct;46(5):488-496
pubmed: 28417679
Cent Eur J Immunol. 2016;41(3):236-242
pubmed: 27833439
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1559-82
pubmed: 17406449
Methods Mol Biol. 2008;436:1-6
pubmed: 18370034
Avian Dis. 2010 Dec;54(4):1197-209
pubmed: 21313840
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Dec;145(16):3320-3333
pubmed: 29168447
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011 Apr;58(2):145-51
pubmed: 21205254
Vet Res Forum. 2020 Spring;11(2):113-120
pubmed: 32782739
Avian Dis. 2008 Mar;52(1):106-10
pubmed: 18459305
Avian Dis. 2016 May;60(1 Suppl):226-31
pubmed: 27309059
Avian Pathol. 2004 Aug;33(4):393-404
pubmed: 15370036
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Oct 09;6:341
pubmed: 31649942
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 May;7(3):240-3
pubmed: 22747716
Avian Dis. 2016 May;60(1 Suppl):256-61
pubmed: 27309065
Arch Virol. 2012 Jun;157(6):1167-72
pubmed: 22426861
Vet Microbiol. 2012 Apr 23;156(1-2):193-9
pubmed: 22019289
Poult Sci. 2020 Mar;99(3):1275-1286
pubmed: 32111305
Vet Sci. 2018 May 09;5(2):
pubmed: 29747397
Vet Microbiol. 2018 Jun;219:8-16
pubmed: 29778208
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Dec 1;117(3-4):610-4
pubmed: 25457514
Immunol Invest. 2016;45(2):116-29
pubmed: 26849159
Vet World. 2019 May;12(5):677-683
pubmed: 31327903

Auteurs

Shaimaa Talat (S)

Department of Birds and Rabbits Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sadat City University, Menoufiya 32958, Egypt.

Reham R Abouelmaatti (RR)

Department of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, Sharkia Veterinary Directorate, General Organization of Veterinary Services (GOVS), Ministry of Agriculture, Sharkia 44511, Egypt.

Rafa Almeer (R)

Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Mohamed M Abdel-Daim (MM)

Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt.

Wael K Elfeil (WK)

Avian and Rabbit Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt.

Classifications MeSH