Determinants of referral of women with urinary incontinence to specialist services: a national cohort study using primary care data from the UK.
Female urinary incontinence
General practice
Primary care
Referral
Journal
BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 10 2020
16 10 2020
Historique:
received:
11
03
2020
accepted:
08
10
2020
entrez:
17
10
2020
pubmed:
18
10
2020
medline:
25
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Female urinary incontinence is underdiagnosed and undertreated in primary care. There is little evidence on factors that determine whether women with urinary incontinence are referred to specialist services. This study aimed to investigate characteristics associated with referrals from primary to specialist secondary care for urinary incontinence. We carried out a cohort study, using primary care data from over 600 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in the United Kingdom. We used multi-level logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) that reflect the impact of patient and GP practice-level characteristics on referrals to specialist services in secondary care within 30 days of a urinary incontinence diagnosis. All women aged ≥18 years newly diagnosed with urinary incontinence between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2013 were included. One-year referral was estimated with death as competing event. Of the 104,466 included women (median age: 58 years), 28,476 (27.3%) were referred within 30 days. Referral rates decreased with age (aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.31-0.37, comparing women aged ≥80 with those aged 40-49 years) and was lower among women who were severely obese (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90), smokers (aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98), women from a minority-ethnic backgrounds (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89 comparing Asian with white women), women with pelvic organ prolapse (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87), and women in Scotland (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.78, comparing women in Scotland and England). One-year referral rate was 34.0% and the pattern of associations with patient characteristics was almost the same as for 30-day referrals. About one in four women with urinary incontinence were referred to specialist secondary care services within one month after a UI diagnosis and one in three within one year. Referral rates decreased with age which confirms concerns that older women with UI are less likely to receive care according to existing clinical guidelines. Referral rates were also lower in women from minority-ethnic backgrounds. These finding may reflect clinicians' beliefs about the appropriateness of referral, differences in women's preferences for treatment, or other factors leading to inequities in referral for urinary incontinence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Female urinary incontinence is underdiagnosed and undertreated in primary care. There is little evidence on factors that determine whether women with urinary incontinence are referred to specialist services. This study aimed to investigate characteristics associated with referrals from primary to specialist secondary care for urinary incontinence.
METHODS
We carried out a cohort study, using primary care data from over 600 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in the United Kingdom. We used multi-level logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) that reflect the impact of patient and GP practice-level characteristics on referrals to specialist services in secondary care within 30 days of a urinary incontinence diagnosis. All women aged ≥18 years newly diagnosed with urinary incontinence between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2013 were included. One-year referral was estimated with death as competing event.
RESULTS
Of the 104,466 included women (median age: 58 years), 28,476 (27.3%) were referred within 30 days. Referral rates decreased with age (aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.31-0.37, comparing women aged ≥80 with those aged 40-49 years) and was lower among women who were severely obese (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90), smokers (aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98), women from a minority-ethnic backgrounds (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89 comparing Asian with white women), women with pelvic organ prolapse (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87), and women in Scotland (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.78, comparing women in Scotland and England). One-year referral rate was 34.0% and the pattern of associations with patient characteristics was almost the same as for 30-day referrals.
CONCLUSIONS
About one in four women with urinary incontinence were referred to specialist secondary care services within one month after a UI diagnosis and one in three within one year. Referral rates decreased with age which confirms concerns that older women with UI are less likely to receive care according to existing clinical guidelines. Referral rates were also lower in women from minority-ethnic backgrounds. These finding may reflect clinicians' beliefs about the appropriateness of referral, differences in women's preferences for treatment, or other factors leading to inequities in referral for urinary incontinence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33066730
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01282-y
pii: 10.1186/s12875-020-01282-y
pmc: PMC7568393
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
211Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 14/70/162
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : 14/70/162
Pays : International
Références
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36
pubmed: 26050254
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1592-1604
pubmed: 29067433
BJOG. 2011 Dec;118(13):1592-600
pubmed: 21895954
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Aug;23(8):1087-93
pubmed: 22527544
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2389-430
pubmed: 17031868
BMJ. 1988 Nov 5;297(6657):1187-9
pubmed: 3144344
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Dec;8(19 Suppl):S598-607
pubmed: 12516954
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 13;3(9):e003389
pubmed: 24038008
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99825
pubmed: 24941260
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;3(2):89-99
pubmed: 25083228
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6
pubmed: 9083302
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Apr;31(4):470-4
pubmed: 22378605
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):601-4
pubmed: 16407004
Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):18-21
pubmed: 7665034
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7:CD006375
pubmed: 28756647
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):141-8
pubmed: 24463674
Maturitas. 2005 Nov 30;52 Suppl 2:S3-12
pubmed: 16297578
Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):88-95
pubmed: 21831517
Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(4):288-94
pubmed: 19191259
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26
pubmed: 19937315
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Jul;6(11 Suppl):S574-9
pubmed: 11183900
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):501-509
pubmed: 28471525
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jan;69(1):4-14
pubmed: 20078607
CMAJ. 2012 Aug 7;184(11):1265-9
pubmed: 22371511
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 30;3(7):
pubmed: 23901026