The 21-gene recurrence score in node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a cautionary tale from an NCDB analysis.


Journal

Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 08 08 2020
accepted: 06 10 2020
pubmed: 19 10 2020
medline: 24 6 2021
entrez: 18 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The 21-gene recurrence score assay (RS) has not been prospectively validated to predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-), node-positive breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, de-escalation based on RS has been demonstrated and partially advocated by retrospective data. The purpose of this study was to identify subgroups of node-positive patients with low to intermediate RS who still benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The National Cancer Database was used to identify 28,591 women with stage I-III, T1-T3, N1, HR+, HER2- breast cancer and a RS ≤ 25 between 2010 and 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables correlating with chemotherapy use and 5-year survival. Subgroup analysis was performed to discern patients in whom the use of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with better survival. A 35% decline in chemotherapy use was observed from 2010 to 2016. Patients with younger age, higher RS, larger tumors and more positive lymph nodes, and those treated by mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection and radiation, were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Chemotherapy use was associated with an improved 5-year survival (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.07). Upon subgroup analysis, this association was lost in patients > 70 years and those with a RS ≤ 11, while patients ≤ 70 with a RS of 12-25 treated with chemotherapy had an absolute 5-year survival advantage of 3.0% (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.42-2.57). Clinicians should be cautious when considering omission of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≤ 70 years, with HR+, HER2-, N1 tumors and a RS 12-25, at least until the results of the anticipated RxPONDER trial become available.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33070279
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05971-1
pii: 10.1007/s10549-020-05971-1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Hormones 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

667-676

Références

Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI et al (2014) US incidence of Breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju055
doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju055 pubmed: 24777111
CCCT—NCTN Steering Committees—Breast Cancer—National Cancer Institute (2014) https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccct/steering-committees/nctn/breast-cancer (accessed 12 Apr 2020)
Kalinsky K, O’Regan RM (2019) Lymph node involvement: positive about the role of the recurrence score in estrogen-driven breast cancer? Cancer 125:177–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31814
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31814 pubmed: 30387877
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:2817–2826. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041588
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588 pubmed: 15591335
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF et al (2018) Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804710
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804710 pubmed: 29860917 pmcid: 6172658
Giuliano AE, Edge SB, Hortobagyi GN (2018) Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25:1783–1785. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6486-6
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6486-6 pubmed: 29671136
Amin MB, American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual, Eight edition/editor-in-chief, Mahul B. Amin, MD, FCAP ; editors, Stephen B. Edge, MD, FACS [and 16 others]; Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR-Technical editor; Laura R. Meyer, CAPM-Managing editor. American Joint Committee on Cancer, Springer, Chicago IL
NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Breast Cancer. Version 3.2020
Tamoxifen citrate, letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane with or without chemotherapy in treating patients with invasive RxPONDER breast cancer—full text view—ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01272037 (accessed 11 Apr 2020)
Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S et al (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6 pubmed: 20005174
Gluz O, Nitz UA, Christgen M et al (2016) West German Study group phase III plan B trial: first prospective outcome data for the 21-gene recurrence score assay and concordance of prognostic markers by central and local pathology assessment. J Clin Oncol 34:2341–2349. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5383
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5383 pubmed: 26926676
Nitz U, Gluz O, Christgen M et al (2017) Reducing chemotherapy use in clinically high-risk, genomically low-risk pN0 and pN1 early breast cancer patients: five-year data from the prospective, randomised phase 3 West German Study Group (WSG) PlanB trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165:573–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4358-6
doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4358-6 pubmed: 28664507 pmcid: 6336763
Stemmer SM, Klang SH, Ben-Baruch N et al (2013) The impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay on clinical decision-making in node-positive (up to 3 positive nodes) estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2603-1
doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2603-1 pubmed: 23801158 pmcid: 3706725
Stemmer SM, Steiner M, Rizel S et al (2017) Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2− node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry. NPJ Breast Cancer 3:32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7
doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7 pubmed: 28900632 pmcid: 5591314
Petkov VI, Miller DP, Howlader N et al (2016) Breast-cancer-specific mortality in patients treated based on the 21-gene assay: a SEER population-based study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2:16017. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjbcancer.2016.17
doi: 10.1038/npjbcancer.2016.17 pubmed: 28721379 pmcid: 5515329
Roberts MC, Miller DP, Shak S, Petkov VI (2017) Breast cancer-specific survival in patients with lymph node-positive hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score results in the SEER database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4162-3
doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4162-3 pubmed: 28243896
Zhang Q-H, Zhang W-W, Wang J et al (2019) Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on chemotherapy decision making and outcomes for breast cancer patients with four or more positive lymph nodes. Ann Transl Med 7:446–446. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.08.82
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.82 pubmed: 31700882 pmcid: 6803245
Ibraheem AF, Press DJ, Olopade OI, Huo D (2019) Community clinical practice patterns and mortality in patients with intermediate oncotype DX recurrence scores: who benefits from chemotherapy?: Intermediate 21-Gene Recurrence Score. Cancer 125:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31818
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31818 pubmed: 30387876
Peethambaram PP, Hoskin TL, Day CN et al (2017) Use of 21-gene recurrence score assay to individualize adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations in ER+/HER2− node positive breast cancer—a National Cancer Database study. NPJ Breast Cancer 3:41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0044-4
doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0044-4 pubmed: 29067357 pmcid: 5648884
Jasem J, Fisher CM, Amini A et al (2017) The 21-gene Recurrence score assay for node-positive, early-stage breast cancer and impact of RxPONDER trial on chemotherapy decision-making: have clinicians already decided? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15:494–503. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0049
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0049
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8
doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 pubmed: 1607900
Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, et al (2016) 70-Gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:717–729. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602253
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602253 pubmed: 27557300
Matikas A, Foukakis T, Swain S, Bergh J (2019) Avoiding over- and undertreatment in patients with resected node-positive breast cancer with the use of gene expression signatures: are we there yet? Ann Oncol 30:1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz126
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz126 pubmed: 31131397 pmcid: 6695578
Mittendorf EA, King TA (2019) Routine Use Of Oncotype DX recurrence score testing in node-positive hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: the time has come. Ann Surg Oncol 26:1173–1175. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07240-y
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07240-y pubmed: 30798446
Wang M, Wu K, Zhang P et al (2019) The prognostic significance of the oncotype DX recurrence score in T1–2N1M0 estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer based on the prognostic stage in the updated AJCC 8th edition. Ann Surg Oncol 26:1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-7068-3
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7068-3 pubmed: 30456680
Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C et al (2010) prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28:1829–1834. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4798
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4798 pubmed: 20212256
Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Rosenberg SM et al (2020) Prognostic impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay among young women with node-negative and node-positive ER-Positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 38:725–733. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01959
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01959 pubmed: 31809240

Auteurs

Roi Weiser (R)

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX, 77555-0737, USA. roweiser@utmb.edu.

Waqar Haque (W)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

Efstathia Polychronopoulou (E)

Office of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Sandra S Hatch (SS)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Yong-Fang Kuo (YF)

Office of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

William J Gradishar (WJ)

Department of Medicine & Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

V Suzanne Klimberg (VS)

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX, 77555-0737, USA. vsklimbe@utmb.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH