Recommendations for use of antigenic tests in the diagnosis of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in the second pandemic wave: attitude in different clinical settings.
Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Antigens, Viral
/ blood
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing
/ standards
COVID-19 Serological Testing
/ methods
Child
Child, Preschool
Consensus
Contact Tracing
Emergencies
Female
Humans
Incidence
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Nasopharynx
/ virology
Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spain
/ epidemiology
Specimen Handling
/ methods
Young Adult
COVID-19
PCR
SARS-CoV2
antigenic test
diagnosis
emergency departments
microbiology
nursing home and long-term facilities
pediatrics
primary care
Journal
Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia
ISSN: 1988-9518
Titre abrégé: Rev Esp Quimioter
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 9108821
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
10
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
19
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The high transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 before and shortly after the onset of symptoms suggests that only diagnosing and isolating symptomatic patients may not be sufficient to interrupt the spread of infection; therefore, public health measures such as personal distancing are also necessary. Additionally, it will be important to detect the newly infected individuals who remain asymptomatic, which may account for 50% or more of the cases. Molecular techniques are the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the massive use of these techniques has generated some problems. On the one hand, the scarcity of resources (analyzers, fungibles and reagents), and on the other the delay in the notification of results. These two facts translate into a lag in the application of isolation measures among cases and contacts, which favors the spread of the infection. Antigen detection tests are also direct diagnostic methods, with the advantage of obtaining the result in a few minutes and at the very "pointof-care". Furthermore, the simplicity and low cost of these tests allow them to be repeated on successive days in certain clinical settings. The sensitivity of antigen tests is generally lower than that of nucleic acid tests, although their specificity is comparable. Antigenic tests have been shown to be more valid in the days around the onset of symptoms, when the viral load in the nasopharynx is higher. Having a rapid and real-time viral detection assay such as the antigen test has been shown to be more useful to control the spread of the infection than more sensitive tests, but with greater cost and response time, such as in case of molecular tests. The main health institutions such as the WHO, the CDC and the Ministry of Health of the Government of Spain propose the use of antigenic tests in a wide variety of strategies to respond to the pandemic. This document aims to support physicians involved in the care of patients with suspected SC2 infection, in the context of a growing incidence in Spain since September 2020, which already represents the second pandemic wave of COVID-19.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33070578
doi: 10.37201/req/120.2020
pmc: PMC7712344
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Viral
0
Types de publication
Consensus Development Conference
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
466-484Informations de copyright
©The Author 2020. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 23;383(4):334-346
pubmed: 32598831
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 23;382(17):1663-1665
pubmed: 32187458
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:397-402
pubmed: 32800855
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8:CD013705
pubmed: 32845525
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;27(6):469-474
pubmed: 32396670
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):e276-e288
pubmed: 32818434
Pediatrics. 2020 Aug;146(2):
pubmed: 32457213
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675
pubmed: 32296168
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 05;172(9):577-582
pubmed: 32150748
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;39(6):1059-1061
pubmed: 32342252
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
J Infect. 2020 Jun;80(6):e14-e18
pubmed: 32171866
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):
pubmed: 33219112
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Jul;179(7):1029-1046
pubmed: 32424745
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 26;24:100433
pubmed: 32766542
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 8;:
pubmed: 32267485
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9):
pubmed: 32571894
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
J Med Virol. 2020 Nov;92(11):2263-2265
pubmed: 32492212
Emergencias. 2020 Ago;32(4):233-241
pubmed: 32692000
Rev Clin Esp. 2020 Nov;220(8):480-494
pubmed: 33994573
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):885-886
pubmed: 32530584
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(14):422-426
pubmed: 32271728
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):e101
pubmed: 32897661
Int J Public Health. 2020 Jun;65(5):533-546
pubmed: 32451563
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Aug;39(8):e199-e200
pubmed: 32516281
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6):
pubmed: 32179660
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Oct;5(10):1299-1305
pubmed: 32651556
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1846-1848
pubmed: 32215581
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469
pubmed: 32235945
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Aug;105(8):808-809
pubmed: 32444450
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2252-2254
pubmed: 32435816
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 26;15(6):e0235460
pubmed: 32589687
Cell. 2020 Nov 12;183(4):982-995.e14
pubmed: 32991843
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 14;55(5):
pubmed: 32217650
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237960
pubmed: 32822413
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:328-333
pubmed: 32497809