Testicular volume in non-obstructive azoospermia with a history of bilateral cryptorchidism may predict successful sperm retrieval by testicular sperm extraction.

cryptorchidism microdissection testicular sperm extraction non‐obstructive azoospermia orchidopexy testicular volume

Journal

Reproductive medicine and biology
ISSN: 1445-5781
Titre abrégé: Reprod Med Biol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101213278

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 31 03 2020
revised: 14 06 2020
accepted: 27 06 2020
entrez: 19 10 2020
pubmed: 20 10 2020
medline: 20 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cryptorchidism is one of the most common causes of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) in adulthood. Even if early orchidopexy is performed to preserve fertility potential, some patients still suffer from azoospermia. Fertility potential is significantly lower in bilateral than unilateral cryptorchidism. The aims of this study were to identify clinical parameters that predict the likely success of sperm recovery by microscopic testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) and also the likely outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using sperm from NOA patients who submitted to bilateral orchidopexy. Fifty-two NOA patients with a history of bilateral cryptorchidism underwent micro-TESE. The following clinical parameters were evaluated as predictive factors for successful sperm recovery: age at micro-TESE; age at orchidopexy; period from orchidopexy to micro-TESE; luteinizing hormone (LH); follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH); testosterone; average testicular volume; and body mass index. In the successful sperm retrieval group, average testicular volume was significantly greater, while serum LH and FSH, and body mass index were significantly lower. In a multivariate analysis, average testicular volume was positively correlated with successful sperm recovery. Our results indicate that testicular volume in NOA patients with bilateral cryptorchidism is a predictor for successful sperm recovery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33071639
doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12338
pii: RMB212338
pmc: PMC7542013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

372-377

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest. Human rights statements and informed consent: This study was approved by the institutional review board of Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center. (Number: 1734) All patients signed an informed written consent form before entering the study, and they were informed that they could terminate their cooperation with us whenever they wanted without any consequences.

Références

Riforma Med. 1950 Sep 23-30;64(38-39):1051-3
pubmed: 14787177
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Nov;78(11):1006-9
pubmed: 18959702
J Urol. 1995 Apr;153(4):1255-8
pubmed: 7869523
Lancet. 2001 Oct 6;358(9288):1156-7
pubmed: 11597673
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 Oct;38(10):588-99
pubmed: 20870444
Br J Urol. 1991 Sep;68(3):285-91
pubmed: 1680519
Fertil Steril. 1993 Jun;59(6):1319-21
pubmed: 8098695
Horm Res. 2001;55(1):6-10
pubmed: 11423735
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1998;196:1-54
pubmed: 9561565
Arch Androl. 2004 Jan-Feb;50(1):19-22
pubmed: 14660166
J Pediatr Surg. 1967 Dec;2(6):513-7
pubmed: 4384021
J Urol. 2001 Jul;166(1):236-9
pubmed: 11435877
J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):659-62
pubmed: 12544338
J Pediatr Surg. 1974 Aug;9(4):445-50
pubmed: 4152535
Hum Reprod. 2004 Oct;19(10):2307-12
pubmed: 15310729
Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103(3):e18-25
pubmed: 25597249
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1:121-4
pubmed: 23503961
J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1287-90
pubmed: 14501743
Horm Res. 2001;55(1):28-32
pubmed: 11423739
J Urol. 1996 Mar;155(3):930-3
pubmed: 8583610
J Pediatr Surg. 1986 Aug;21(8):691-6
pubmed: 2875145
J Urol. 1994 Feb;151(2):381-3
pubmed: 7904310
BJU Int. 2004 May;93(7):1015-7
pubmed: 15142154
J Urol. 1998 Nov;160(5):1834-7
pubmed: 9783970
J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1697-701
pubmed: 11025752
Eur Urol. 1991;20(2):126-8
pubmed: 1684324
BJU Int. 2003 May;91(7):670-4
pubmed: 12699482
Hum Reprod. 2003 Dec;18(12):2534-9
pubmed: 14645168

Auteurs

Akiyoshi Osaka (A)

Department of Urology Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Toshiyuki Iwahata (T)

Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Yoshitomo Kobori (Y)

Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Yukihito Shimomura (Y)

Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Naoki Yoshikawa (N)

Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Shin Onota (S)

Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Atsushi Yamamoto (A)

Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Hisamitsu Ide (H)

Department of Urology Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Kouhei Sugimoto (K)

Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Hiroshi Okada (H)

Department of Urology Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.
Department of Reproduction Center Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

Classifications MeSH