Prediction of Neurocognitive Outcome after Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Serum Neuron-Specific Enolase and S100 biomarkers.
ECLIA - electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer
ERBI - Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index
GCS - Glasgow Coma Scale
GOSE - Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended
HADS - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
MMSE - Mini-Mental State Examination
NSE
NSE - Neuron-Specific Enolase
Neurocognitive Outcome
PSI - Processing Speed Index
RMSEA - Root Mean Square Error of Approximation
S100
SEM - Structural Equation Modeling
TBI - Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
WAIS - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
Journal
Journal of medicine and life
ISSN: 1844-3117
Titre abrégé: J Med Life
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101477617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
19
10
2020
pubmed:
20
10
2020
medline:
18
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Seric biomarkers have been tested in a large number of studies on traumatic brain injuries (TBI) patients in order to predict severity, especially related to the short-term outcome. However, TBI patients have a high risk of developing long-term complications such as physical disability, cognitive impairment, psychiatric pathology, epilepsy, and others. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between protein biomarkers S100 and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurocognitive status at 10- and 90-days post-injury. Both biomarkers were tested in the first 4h and after 72h post-injury in 62 patients with moderate-severe TBI. The patients were evaluated by a series of neurocognitive tests: Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI), Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Processing Speed Index (PSI), and Stroop Test, at 10 and 90 days post-injury and supplementary by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 90 days. For evaluating the whole neurocognitive status instead of every scale separately, we used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), while for anxiety and depressive symptoms, we used multiple regression analyses. SEM showed that NSE values at 4 hours were significant predictors of the cognitive status at 10 (p=0.034) and 90 days (p= 0.023). Also, there were found significant correlations between NSE at 4h and the anxiety level. This study demonstrated a significant correlation between NSE at 4h and short and medium-term neuropsychological outcomes, which recommends using this biomarker for selecting patients with a higher risk of cognitive dysfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33072201
doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0147
pii: JMedLife-13-306
pmc: PMC7550145
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
S100 Proteins
0
Phosphopyruvate Hydratase
EC 4.2.1.11
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
306-313Informations de copyright
©Carol Davila University Press.
Références
Brain Inj. 2006 Sep;20(10):1007-17
pubmed: 17060133
Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):207-19
pubmed: 26447582
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e56805
pubmed: 23483891
eNeuro. 2016 Dec 21;3(6):
pubmed: 28032118
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Mar;17(2):354-63
pubmed: 21320377
Brain Inj. 2017;31(10):1270-1278
pubmed: 28686063
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Dec;11(12):1103-12
pubmed: 23153408
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jan 1;36(1):100-110
pubmed: 30084741
Neuropsychology. 2010 May;24(3):336-344
pubmed: 20438211
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;70(1):95-100
pubmed: 11118255
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Dec;84(12):1803-7
pubmed: 14669187
Iran J Neurol. 2017 Apr 4;16(2):83-89
pubmed: 28761630
Neurol Sci. 2018 Apr;39(4):753-755
pubmed: 29214386
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S152-73
pubmed: 24581903
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Brain Inj. 2016;30(13-14):1665-1671
pubmed: 27740857
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
CMAJ Open. 2016 Jul 22;4(3):E371-E382
pubmed: 27975043
Neurol Sci. 2020 May;41(5):1171-1181
pubmed: 31897941
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 May;28(4):567-80
pubmed: 16624784
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):E18-E27
pubmed: 28520675
J Mol Neurosci. 2020 Aug;70(8):1267-1273
pubmed: 32350763
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Mar;21(6):1346-1354
pubmed: 28387891
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Apr 24;13:1359-1365
pubmed: 32425568
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Jun 8;:
pubmed: 28595478
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2010;106:247-50
pubmed: 19812958
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Aug;17(3):303-7
pubmed: 14704894
J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77
pubmed: 11832252
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Feb;33(2):327-334
pubmed: 30168362
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Apr 15;32(8):571-80
pubmed: 25222349
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(1):26-31; discussion 31-2
pubmed: 9059708
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):273-84
pubmed: 13680435
Front Neurol. 2017 Jul 03;8:300
pubmed: 28717351
Neuroimmunomodulation. 2014;21(1):8-12
pubmed: 24080899
Neuropsychology. 2018 May;32(4):410-416
pubmed: 29389151
Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jan;34(1):120-139
pubmed: 31020899
Sci Rep. 2020 May 7;10(1):7718
pubmed: 32382007
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1026-33
pubmed: 22366842
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Aug;22(4):465-71
pubmed: 10923056
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(1):1-14
pubmed: 24303952
Scand J Psychol. 2020 Oct;61(5):663-670
pubmed: 32596856