Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.


Journal

JAMA internal medicine
ISSN: 2168-6114
Titre abrégé: JAMA Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589534

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 12 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 20 10 2020
medline: 15 4 2021
entrez: 19 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Enrollment in Medicaid managed care plans has increased rapidly, particularly in national commercial insurance plans. Whether the type of managed care plan is associated with the use of health services for Medicaid beneficiaries is unknown. To compare the use of outpatient and acute care between Medicaid enrollees randomly assigned to a national commercial managed care plan or a local Medicaid-focused managed care plan. This natural experiment of a cohort of Medicaid enrollees randomly assigned to 2 managed care plans in a Northeastern US state was conducted from June 30, 2009, to June 30, 2013. Statistical analysis was performed from September 1, 2019, to August 30, 2020. Assignment to a Medicaid-focused insurance plan or a commercial managed care plan. Outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and total inpatient and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations. A total of 8010 patients were included in the analysis: 4737 were assigned to a Medicaid-focused plan (2795 female [59.0%]; mean [SD] age, 17.8 [3.2] years) and 3273 to a commercial managed care plan (1915 female [58.5%]; mean [SD] age, 17.9 [3.3] years). Those randomly assigned to the Medicaid-focused plan had a mean (SD) of 6.67 (9.18) annual outpatient visits per person, and those assigned to the commercial plan had a mean (SD) of 8.36 (11.77) annual outpatient visits per person (adjusted absolute difference, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.31-2.13]; 22% relative difference). The increased use of outpatient visits in the commercial plan was associated with an increase in specialty care visits (mean [SD], 2.34 [6.31] visits in Medicaid-focused plan vs 3.75 [9.32] visits in commerical plan; adjusted absolute difference, 1.43 visits [95% CI, 1.25-1.56 visits]; 61% relative difference). Mean (SD) annual emergency department visits were 0.49 (1.39) per person in the Medicaid-focused plan and 0.51 (1.40) in the commercial plan (adjusted absolute difference, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.05]). Mean (SD) annual inpatient admissions were 0.067 (0.45) per person in the Medicaid-focused plan and 0.069 (0.53) in the commercial plan (adjusted absolute difference, 0.003 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.02]). Plan assignment was not significantly associated with ambulatory care-sensitive admissions. Results were consistent in instrumental variables analyses that accounted for disenrollment and switching. Compared with Medicaid managed care enrollees assigned to a Medicaid-focused plan, those assigned to a commercial plan had more outpatient visits, particularly for specialty care, but had similar rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations. These findings suggest that the type of managed care plan may be associated with health services use and spending among Medicaid beneficiaries and that random assignment may help states understand how well different plans perform for enrollees.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33074283
pii: 2771819
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408
pmc: PMC7573794
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1672-1679

Références

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1919-1924
pubmed: 31228048
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):77-84
pubmed: 31905073
Health Econ. 2011 Apr;20(4):446-60
pubmed: 21394815
JAMA. 2007 Oct 10;298(14):1674-81
pubmed: 17925519
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Feb;78(1):36-47
pubmed: 30947600
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Jun;11:1-16
pubmed: 21675383
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):728
pubmed: 30241523
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1981-1989
pubmed: 27631748
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Oct;65(5):638-48
pubmed: 18434296
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3770-3789
pubmed: 29952062
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1147-55
pubmed: 26153309
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2524-2531
pubmed: 28655014
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 2):363-83
pubmed: 18199191
JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1769-75
pubmed: 10568652
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1137-43
pubmed: 12835199

Auteurs

Shailender Swaminathan (S)

Leveraging Evidence for Access and Development, Krea University, Sricity, India.
Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Chima D Ndumele (CD)

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.

Sarah H Gordon (SH)

Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Yoojin Lee (Y)

Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Amal N Trivedi (AN)

Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center of Innovation in Long-term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH