Measurement tools used to assess unfinished nursing care: A systematic review of psychometric properties.
care rationing
implicit rationing
missed nursing care
psychometric properties
rationed care
systematic review
task undone
unfinished care
validation studies
Journal
Journal of advanced nursing
ISSN: 1365-2648
Titre abrégé: J Adv Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609811
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
19
04
2020
revised:
17
08
2020
accepted:
07
09
2020
pubmed:
20
10
2020
medline:
20
5
2021
entrez:
19
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Different tools have been developed and validated to measure unfinished nursing care. However, no systematic review of the psychometric properties has been performed describing the quality of the methods used to estimate their validity. (a) To identify tools measuring unfinished nursing care that have undergone validation processes; (b) to evaluate critically the quality of the methods used in ascertaining their psychometric properties; and (c) to compare the estimated psychometric properties of these tools. A systematic review of the psychometric properties also evaluating their methodological quality was performed by following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews. The databases Medline, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Google and Google Scholar were searched up to 30 June 2018. Data extraction was performed following the predetermined eligibility criteria. Eight properties and their methodological quality were assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments criteria. A total of 20 studies reported validation data regarding three family of tools: the Missed Care Survey (MISSCARE), the Basal Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care (BERNCA) and the Task Undone scale (TU-7). The most estimated psychometric properties across studies were internal consistency, followed by structural validity, content validity, and cross-cultural validity. The less evaluated psychometric properties were reliability, hypothesis testing and convergent and criterion validity. The psychometric properties of the investigated tools showed a more than acceptable quality, as did the methodologies used to estimate these properties. The MISSCARE survey is the most widely used tool validated across countries to date. Evaluating the concurrent reliability of the tools available is strongly recommended to assess their effectiveness in measuring the same phenomenon. 背景: 已开发并验证了多种工具,可用来测量未完成的护理工作。但是,尚未进行心理测量特性的系统评估来说明有效性评估方法的质量。 目的: (a)为确定已通过验证的未完成护理的测量工具;(b)着重评估用于确定其心理测量特性的方法质量;和(c)比较这些工具的估计心理测量特性。 设计: 按照关于选择健康测量仪器(COSMIN)指南进行系统评估的共识标准,进行心理测量特性的系统评估,其还可用来评估方法学质量。 数据来源: 查询Medline、护理和联合卫生文献累积索引、 PubMed、谷歌和谷歌学术数据库中截至2018年6月30日的数据。 评估方法: 采用预先确定的合格标准进行数据提取,利用共识标准,评估八大特性及其方法学质量,并选择适当的健康测量仪器标准。 结果: 共有20项研究报告了涉及下列三大工具类别的验证数据:护理缺失研究(MISSCARE)、护理服务受限程度(BERNC)以及未完任务量表(TU-7)。各项研究中涉及最多的估计心理测量特性为内部一致性,随后是结构效度、内容效度和跨文化效度。较少评估的心理测量特性为可靠性、假设检验和聚合以及标准效度。 结论: 研究工具的心理测量特性超出可接受质量,同时用于估计这些特性的方法论也超出可接受质量水平。 影响: MISSCARE调查应用最广泛,已经过多国验证。强烈建议评估可用工具的同期可靠性,进而评估其在测量相同现象方面的有效性。.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Different tools have been developed and validated to measure unfinished nursing care. However, no systematic review of the psychometric properties has been performed describing the quality of the methods used to estimate their validity.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
(a) To identify tools measuring unfinished nursing care that have undergone validation processes; (b) to evaluate critically the quality of the methods used in ascertaining their psychometric properties; and (c) to compare the estimated psychometric properties of these tools.
DESIGN
METHODS
A systematic review of the psychometric properties also evaluating their methodological quality was performed by following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews.
DATA SOURCES
METHODS
The databases Medline, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Google and Google Scholar were searched up to 30 June 2018.
REVIEW METHODS
METHODS
Data extraction was performed following the predetermined eligibility criteria. Eight properties and their methodological quality were assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments criteria.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 20 studies reported validation data regarding three family of tools: the Missed Care Survey (MISSCARE), the Basal Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care (BERNCA) and the Task Undone scale (TU-7). The most estimated psychometric properties across studies were internal consistency, followed by structural validity, content validity, and cross-cultural validity. The less evaluated psychometric properties were reliability, hypothesis testing and convergent and criterion validity.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The psychometric properties of the investigated tools showed a more than acceptable quality, as did the methodologies used to estimate these properties.
IMPACT
CONCLUSIONS
The MISSCARE survey is the most widely used tool validated across countries to date. Evaluating the concurrent reliability of the tools available is strongly recommended to assess their effectiveness in measuring the same phenomenon.
背景: 已开发并验证了多种工具,可用来测量未完成的护理工作。但是,尚未进行心理测量特性的系统评估来说明有效性评估方法的质量。 目的: (a)为确定已通过验证的未完成护理的测量工具;(b)着重评估用于确定其心理测量特性的方法质量;和(c)比较这些工具的估计心理测量特性。 设计: 按照关于选择健康测量仪器(COSMIN)指南进行系统评估的共识标准,进行心理测量特性的系统评估,其还可用来评估方法学质量。 数据来源: 查询Medline、护理和联合卫生文献累积索引、 PubMed、谷歌和谷歌学术数据库中截至2018年6月30日的数据。 评估方法: 采用预先确定的合格标准进行数据提取,利用共识标准,评估八大特性及其方法学质量,并选择适当的健康测量仪器标准。 结果: 共有20项研究报告了涉及下列三大工具类别的验证数据:护理缺失研究(MISSCARE)、护理服务受限程度(BERNC)以及未完任务量表(TU-7)。各项研究中涉及最多的估计心理测量特性为内部一致性,随后是结构效度、内容效度和跨文化效度。较少评估的心理测量特性为可靠性、假设检验和聚合以及标准效度。 结论: 研究工具的心理测量特性超出可接受质量,同时用于估计这些特性的方法论也超出可接受质量水平。 影响: MISSCARE调查应用最广泛,已经过多国验证。强烈建议评估可用工具的同期可靠性,进而评估其在测量相同现象方面的有效性。.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(chi)
背景: 已开发并验证了多种工具,可用来测量未完成的护理工作。但是,尚未进行心理测量特性的系统评估来说明有效性评估方法的质量。 目的: (a)为确定已通过验证的未完成护理的测量工具;(b)着重评估用于确定其心理测量特性的方法质量;和(c)比较这些工具的估计心理测量特性。 设计: 按照关于选择健康测量仪器(COSMIN)指南进行系统评估的共识标准,进行心理测量特性的系统评估,其还可用来评估方法学质量。 数据来源: 查询Medline、护理和联合卫生文献累积索引、 PubMed、谷歌和谷歌学术数据库中截至2018年6月30日的数据。 评估方法: 采用预先确定的合格标准进行数据提取,利用共识标准,评估八大特性及其方法学质量,并选择适当的健康测量仪器标准。 结果: 共有20项研究报告了涉及下列三大工具类别的验证数据:护理缺失研究(MISSCARE)、护理服务受限程度(BERNC)以及未完任务量表(TU-7)。各项研究中涉及最多的估计心理测量特性为内部一致性,随后是结构效度、内容效度和跨文化效度。较少评估的心理测量特性为可靠性、假设检验和聚合以及标准效度。 结论: 研究工具的心理测量特性超出可接受质量,同时用于估计这些特性的方法论也超出可接受质量水平。 影响: MISSCARE调查应用最广泛,已经过多国验证。强烈建议评估可用工具的同期可靠性,进而评估其在测量相同现象方面的有效性。.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
565-582Subventions
Organisme : RANCARE consortium COST Action
ID : CA15208
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Al-Kandari, F., & Thomas, D. (2009). Factors contributing to nursing task incompletion as perceived by nurses working in Kuwait general hospital. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 3430-3440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02795.x
Ausserhofer, D., Zander, B., Busse, R., Schubert, M., De Geest, S., Rafferty, A. M., & Schwendimann, R. (2014). Prevalence, patterns and predictors of care left undone in European hospitals: Results from the multi-country cross-sectional RN4CAST study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002318
Bagnasco, A., Dasso, N., Rossi, S., Timmins, F., Aleo, G., Catania, G., Zanini, M., & Sasso, L. (2019). Missed care in children's nursing-An emergent concern. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75, 921-923. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13965
Ball, J. E., Bruyneel, L., Aiken, L. H., Sermeus, W., Sloane, D. M., Rafferty, A. M., Lindqvist, R., Tishelman, C., & Griffiths, P.; RN4Cast Consortium. (2017). Post-operative mortality, missed care and nurse staffing in nine countries: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 78, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.004
Ball, J. E., Murrels, T., Rafferty, A. M., Morrow, E., & Griffiths, P. (2014). ‘Care left undone’ during nursing shifts: Associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001767
Bragadottir, H., Kalisch, B. J., Smaradottir, S. B., & Jonsdottir, H. H. (2015). Translation and psychometric testing of the Icelandic version of the MISSCARE Survey. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 29, 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12150
Bruyneel, L., Li, B., Ausserhofer, D., Lesaffre, E., Dumitrescu, I., Smith, H. L., Sloane, D. M., Aiken, L. H., & Sermeus, W. (2015). Organization of hospital nursing, provision of nursing care and patient experiences with care in Europe. Medical Care Research and Review, 72, 643-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558715589188
Buerhaus, P. I., Auerbach, D. I., & Staiger, D. O. (2016). Recent changes in the number of nurses graduating from undergraduate and graduate programs. Nursing Economic$, 34, 46-48.
Castner, J. (2012). A multi-level model of missed nursing care in the context of hospital merger. Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses.
Castner, J., & Dean-Baar, S. (2014). Measuring nursing error: Psychometrics of MISSCARE and practice and professional issues items. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 22, 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.22.3.421
Castner, J., Yow-Wu, B., & Dean-Baar, S. (2015). Multi-level model of missed nursing care in the context of hospital merger. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37, 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945914535670
Cooper, A. L., & Brown, J. (2017). Maximising nurses' and midwives' response rates to surveys. Nurse Researcher, 18, 31-35. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2017.e1494
De Vellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26, 2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Dhaini, S. R., Zunga, F., Ausserhofer, D., Simon, M., Kunz, R., De Geest, S., & Schwendimann, R. (2017). Are nursing home care workers' health and presenteeism associated with implicit rationing of care? A cross-sectional multi-site study. Geriatric Nursing, 38, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.07.003
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260, 1743-1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.12.1743
Drach-Zahavy, A., & Srulovici, E. (2019). The personality profile of the accountable nurse and missed nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75, 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13849
Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2018). Missed nursing care: Research on interventions? Applied Nursing Research, 40, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2018.02.003
Hamilton, P., Willis, E., Jones, T., McKelvie, R., Blackman, I., Toffoli, L., & Harvey, C. (2017). Evaluating the performance of a single item, global, estimate of Missed Nursing care. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 25, 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.1.121
Horner, L. K. (2016). Co-constructing research: A critical literature review. AHRC. Retrieved from https://connected-communities.org/index.php/project_resources/coconstructing-research-a-criticalliterature-review
Jones, T. L. (2014). Validation of the perceived implicit rationing of nursing care (PIRNCA) instrument. Nursing Forum, 49, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12076
Jones, T. L. (2015). A descriptive analysis of implicit rationing of nursing care: Frequency and patterns in Texas. Nursing Economic$, 33, 144-154.
Jones, T. L., Gemeinhardt, G., Thompson, J. A., & Hamilton, P. (2015). Measuring Unfinished Nursing Care: What to consider when choosing and scoring surveys. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 31, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000143
Kalisch, B. J. (2006). Missed nursing care: A qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 21, 306-313. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-200610000-00006
Kalisch, B. J., Landstrom, G. L., & Hinshaw, A. S. (2009). Missed nursing care: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 1509-1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05027.x
Kalisch, B. J., Lee, K. H., Zein, J. E., & Doumit, M. (2013). Missed Nursing Care, level of staffing and job satisfaction Lebanon versus the United States. Journal of Nursing Administration, 43, 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31828eebaa
Kalisch, B. J., Terzioglu, F., & Duygulu, S. (2012). The MISSCARE Survey-Turkish: Psychometric properties and findings. Nursing Economic$, 30, 29-37.
Kalisch, B. J., Tschannen, D., Lee, H., & Friese, C. R. (2011). Hospital variation in missed nursing care. American Journal of Medical Quality, 26, 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860610395929
Kalisch, B. J., & Williams, R. A. (2009). Development and psychometric testing of a tool to measure missed nursing care. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181a23cf5
Kalisch, B. J., Xie, B., & Dabney, B. W. (2014). Patient-reported missed nursing care correlated with adverse events. American Journal of Medical Quality, 29, 415-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860613501715
Kouta, C., & Kaite, C. P. (2011). Gender discrimination and nursing: A literature review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27, 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.10.006
Lake, E. T., Germack, H. D., & Viscardi, M. K. (2015). Missed nursing care is linked to patient satisfaction: A cross-sectional study of US hospitals. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25, 535-543. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-00396
Lucero, R., Lake, E., & Aiken, L. (2009). Variations in nursing care quality across hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 2299-2310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05090.x
Lucero, R. J., Lake, E. T., & Aiken, L. (2010). Nursing care quality and adverse events in US hospitals. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 2185-2195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03250.x
Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19, 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Palese, A., Bassi, E., Tommasini, C., Vesca, R., Di Falco, A., De Lucia, P., & Blackman, I. (2018). Missed nursing care and Italian nursing practice: Preliminary findings of a consensus conference. Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca, 37, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1702/2996.29986
Papastavrou, E., Andreou, P., Tsangari, H., Schubert, M., & De Geest, S. (2014). Rationing of Nursing Care within professional environmental constraints: A correlational study. Clinical Nursing Research, 23, 314-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773812469543
Papastavrou, E., Charalambous, A., Vryonides, S., Eleftheriou, C., & Merkouris, A. (2016). To what extent are patients' needs met on oncology units? The phenomenon of care rationing. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 21, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2016.01.002
Phelan, A., & McCarty, S. (2016). Missed care: Community nursing in Ireland. University College Dublin and the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organization.
Pourrabia, P., Bahadori, M., Hosseini, S. M., & Ravangard, R. (2018). The effects of implementing an accreditation process on health care quality using structural equation modelling. Health Care Management, 37, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000229
Prinsen, C. A., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., De Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Rochefort, C. (2008). Structure et fonctionnement des services québécois de néonatologie et leurs relations avec la qualité des soins et des indicateurs de santé au travail chez les infirmières. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Montreal.
Rochefort, C. M., & Clarke, S. P. (2010). Nurses’ work environments, care rationing, job outcomes, and quality of care on neonatal units. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 2213-2224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05376.x
Schubert, M., Ausserhofer, D., Desmedt, M., Schwendimann, R., Lesaffre, E., Li, B., & De Geest, S. (2013). Levels and correlates of implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals. A cross sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.016
Schubert, M., Glass, T. R., Clarke, S. P., Aiken, L. H., Schaffert-Witvliet, B., Sloane, D. M., & De Geest, S. (2008). Rationing of nursing care and its relationship to patient outcomes: The Swiss extension of the International Hospital Outcomes Study. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 20, 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzn017
Schubert, M., Glass, T. R., Clarke, S. P., Schaffert-Witvliet, B., & De Geest, S. (2007). Validation of the Basel extent of rationing of nursing care instrument. Nurse Research, 56, 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000299853.52429.62
Seys, D., Bruyneel, L., Decramer, M., Lodewijckx, C., Panella, M., Sermeus, W., Boto, P., & Vanhaecht, K. (2017). An international study of adherence to guidelines for patients hospitalised with a COPD Exacerbation. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 14, 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2016.1257599
Siqueira, L. D. C., Caliri, M. H. L., Haas, V. J., Kalisch, B. J., & Dantas, R. A. S. (2017). Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL Survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 25, e2975. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975
Siqueira, L. D. C., Caliri, M. H. L., Kalisch, B. J., & Dantas, R. A. S. (2013). Cultural adaptation and internal consistency analysis of the MISSCARE survey for use in Brazil. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 21, 610-617. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692013000200019
Sist, L., Contini, C., Bandini, A., Bandini, S., Massa, L., Zanini, R., & Ferraresi, A. (2017). MISSCARE Survey - Italian Version: Findings from an Italian validation study. Igiene E Sanità Pubblica, 73, 29-45.
Sochalski, J. (2004). Is more better? The relationship between nurse staffing and the quality of nursing care in hospitals. Medical Care, 42, 1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000109127.76128.aa
Squires, A., Aiken, L. H., van den Heede, K., Sermeus, W., Bruyneel, L., Lindqvist, R., Schoonhoven, L., Stromseng, I., Busse, R., Brzostek, T., Ensio, A., Moreno-Casbas, M., Rafferty, A. M., Schubert, M., Zikos, D., & Matthews, A. (2013). A systematic survey instrument translation process for multi-country, comparative health workforce studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.015
Taylor, K. O. (1946). Methods of measuring the quality of nursing care. Modern Hospital, 66, 52-55.
Uchmanowicz, I., Kirwan, M., Riklikiene, O., Wolfshaut-Wolak, R., Gotlib, J., & Schubert, M. (2019). Validation of Polish version of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care revised questionnaire. PLoS One, 14, e0212918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212918
van Zelm, R., Coeckelberghs, E., Sermeus, W., Buck, D. E., van Overstraeten, A., Weimann, A., Seys, D., & Vanhaecht, K. (2017). Variation in care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: Protocol adherence in 12 European hospitals. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 32, 1471-1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2863-z
Watson, R., Van der Ark, L. A., Lin, L. C., Fieo, R., Deary, I. J., & Meijer, R. R. (2012). Item response theory: How Mokken scaling can be used in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 2736-2746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03893.x
White, E. (2017). A comparison of nursing education and workforce planning initiatives in the United States and England. Policy, Politics and Nursing Practice, 18, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154418759666
Zeleníková, R., Gurková, E., & Jarošová, D. (2019). Missed nursing care measured by MISSCARE survey-The first pilot study in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 10, 958-966. https://doi.org/10.15452/CEJNM.2019.10.0002
Zhu, X. W., You, L. M., Zheng, J., Liu, K., Fang, J. B., Hou, S. X., Lu, M. M., Lv, A. L., Ma, W. G., Wang, H. H., Wu, Z. J., & Zhang, L. F. (2012). Nurse staffing levels make a difference on patient outcomes: A multisite study in Chinese hospitals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44, 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01454.x
Zúñiga, F., Schubert, M., Hamers, J. P. H., Simon, M., Schwendimann, R., Engberg, S., & Ausserhofer, D. (2016). Evidence on the validity and reliability of the German, French and Italian nursing home version of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care instrument. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72, 1948-1963. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12975