Challenges in microbiological identification of aerobic bacteria isolated from the skin of reptiles.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
07
2020
accepted:
19
09
2020
entrez:
19
10
2020
pubmed:
20
10
2020
medline:
28
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bacterial pathogens are often involved in dermatitis in reptiles. Exact identification of reptile-specific but otherwise uncommon bacterial species may be challenging. However, identification is crucial to evaluate the importance of the detected bacterial species. The aim of this study was to assess the number of aerobic bacterial isolates cultured from skin-derived samples of reptiles which were not reliably identified by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and to determine their identity. Routine bacterial diagnostics were performed on 235 skin samples, and 417 bacterial isolates were analysed by MALDI-TOF MS. The isolates were grouped into categories based on their first score: category I (≥ 2.00), category II (≥ 1.70 and < 2.00), and category III (< 1.70). Isolates from category III were further investigated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and the following criteria were applied: query cover 100%, e-value rounded to 0.0 and sequence identity (%) > 98.00% for genus identification, and > 99.00% for species identification. The majority of bacterial isolates were in category I (85.1%) or category II (8.4%). In category III (6.5%) results achieved at first by MALDI-TOF MS corresponded to the results of the molecular analysis in 8.0% of isolates at the species level and in 24.0% at the genus level. Bacterial isolates classified as category III were heterogenic in genus (e.g. Chryseobacterium, Devriesea, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Uruburuella), and some have only been described in reptiles so far. Most of the aerobic bacterial isolates cultured from reptile skin achieved high scores by MALDI-TOF MS. However, in the majority of category III isolates MALDI-TOF MS results were different from those of the molecular analysis. This strengthens the need to carefully examine low-scored results for plausibility and to be familiar with the occurrence and morphology of relevant reptile-specific bacterial species (e.g. Devriesea agamarum) as well as with the limits of the database used.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33075077
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240085
pii: PONE-D-20-20507
pmc: PMC7571677
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0240085Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Laboklin GmbH & Co KG is a veterinary laboratory offering diagnostic services including bacteriological examinations for various samples. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Extremophiles. 2009 May;13(3):541-55
pubmed: 19381755
J Biotechnol. 2019 Aug 20;302:101-111
pubmed: 31278958
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Apr;48(4):1169-75
pubmed: 20164271
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Apr;65(Pt 4):1251-1255
pubmed: 25634951
Res Vet Sci. 2015 Aug;101:42-9
pubmed: 26267088
Vet J. 2008 May;176(2):254-6
pubmed: 17451977
Syst Appl Microbiol. 1985;6:143-51
pubmed: 11542017
Vet Rec. 2015 Mar 14;176(11):285
pubmed: 25487809
Ecohealth. 2018 Mar;15(1):109-120
pubmed: 29134436
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1549-54
pubmed: 20220166
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Mar;65(Pt 3):975-982
pubmed: 25574036
Vet Microbiol. 2009 Mar 2;134(3-4):267-71
pubmed: 18834680
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):840-62, table of contents
pubmed: 15489351
J Med Microbiol. 2012 Oct;61(Pt 10):1409-1416
pubmed: 22745134
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Sep;44(9):3469-70
pubmed: 16954306
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 20;9(10):e110128
pubmed: 25330320
Vet Dermatol. 2011 Apr;22(2):150-61
pubmed: 20887405
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154329
pubmed: 27100182
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Oct;14(10):908-34
pubmed: 18828852
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47075
pubmed: 23071716
Mol Diagn. 2001 Dec;6(4):313-21
pubmed: 11774196
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Mar;55(Pt 2):643-647
pubmed: 15774637
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181860
pubmed: 28738078
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0117617
pubmed: 25658760
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Oct;50(10):3301-8
pubmed: 22855510
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38515
pubmed: 22685576
Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2013 Sep;16(3):523-77
pubmed: 24018026
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008 Sep;58(Pt 9):2206-9
pubmed: 18768630
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Dec;67(3):574-81
pubmed: 16859787
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Aug;49(8):2980-4
pubmed: 21632894
Vet J. 2008 Jan;175(1):53-68
pubmed: 17346998
Acta Vet Hung. 2014 Jun;62(2):180-93
pubmed: 24334084
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;31(6):1109-19
pubmed: 21948378
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;20(12):2178-9
pubmed: 25419837
J Med Microbiol. 2007 Apr;56(Pt 4):563-564
pubmed: 17374901