Restaging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumours after BCG Immunotherapy Induction in Patients with T1 Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Might not Be Associated with Oncologic Benefit.
BCG
bladder cancer
reTURB
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Oct 2020
15 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
17
09
2020
revised:
09
10
2020
accepted:
10
10
2020
entrez:
20
10
2020
pubmed:
21
10
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumours (reTURB) 2-6 weeks after primary TURB. However, in clinical practice some patients undergo a second TURB procedure after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy (BCG)induction. To date, there are no studies comparing post-BCG reTURB with the classic pre-BCG approach. The aim of this study was to assess whether the performance of reTURB after BCG induction in T1HG bladder cancer is related to potential oncological benefits. Data from 645 patients with primary T1HG bladder cancer treated between 2001 and 2019 in 12 tertiary care centres were retrospectively reviewed. The study included patients who underwent reTURB before BCG induction (Pre-BCG group: 397 patients; 61.6%) and those who had reTURB performed after BCG induction (Post-BCG group: 248 patients, 38.4%). The decision to perform reTURB before or after BCG induction was according to the surgeon's discretion, as well as a consideration of local proceedings and protocols. Due to variation in patients' characteristics, both propensity-score-matched analysis (PSM) and inverse-probability weighting (IPW) were implemented. The five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 64.7% and 69.1% for the Pre- and Post-BCG groups, respectively, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 82.7% and 83.3% for the Pre- and Post-BCG groups, respectively (both: Our results suggest that there might be no difference in recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival rates, regardless of whether patients have reTURB performed before or after BCG induction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumours (reTURB) 2-6 weeks after primary TURB. However, in clinical practice some patients undergo a second TURB procedure after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy (BCG)induction. To date, there are no studies comparing post-BCG reTURB with the classic pre-BCG approach. The aim of this study was to assess whether the performance of reTURB after BCG induction in T1HG bladder cancer is related to potential oncological benefits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Data from 645 patients with primary T1HG bladder cancer treated between 2001 and 2019 in 12 tertiary care centres were retrospectively reviewed. The study included patients who underwent reTURB before BCG induction (Pre-BCG group: 397 patients; 61.6%) and those who had reTURB performed after BCG induction (Post-BCG group: 248 patients, 38.4%). The decision to perform reTURB before or after BCG induction was according to the surgeon's discretion, as well as a consideration of local proceedings and protocols. Due to variation in patients' characteristics, both propensity-score-matched analysis (PSM) and inverse-probability weighting (IPW) were implemented.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 64.7% and 69.1% for the Pre- and Post-BCG groups, respectively, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 82.7% and 83.3% for the Pre- and Post-BCG groups, respectively (both:
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that there might be no difference in recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival rates, regardless of whether patients have reTURB performed before or after BCG induction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33076249
pii: jcm9103306
doi: 10.3390/jcm9103306
pmc: PMC7602446
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):639-657
pubmed: 31443960
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Apr;12(4):225-35
pubmed: 25800393
Eur Urol. 2020 Nov;78(5):690-698
pubmed: 32446864
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):558-567
pubmed: 28753839
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):60-9
pubmed: 26210894
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Apr 12;96(14):1124-7
pubmed: 27095782
Urol Int. 2019;102(1):60-68
pubmed: 30269132
J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):74-6
pubmed: 10379743
Stat Med. 2009 Apr 30;28(9):1416-20; author reply 1420-3
pubmed: 19340845
Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 04;9:465
pubmed: 31214506
Eur Urol. 2018 Jun;73(6):925-933
pubmed: 29523366
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 May;8(5-6):E306-10
pubmed: 24940455
BJU Int. 2015 Nov;116(5):721-6
pubmed: 25715815
Eur Urol. 2002 May;41(5):523-31
pubmed: 12074794
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):44-52
pubmed: 26469362
J Endourol. 2020 Aug;34(8):795-804
pubmed: 32336149
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):54-9
pubmed: 23146082